References
- Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297–319.
- Mas Tur V, MacGregor C, Jayaswal R, et al. A review of keratoconus: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 770–783.
- Smolek MK, Beekhuis WH. Collagen fibril orientation in the human corneal stroma and its implications in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 1289–1290.
- Ertan A, Muftuoglu O. Keratoconus clinical findings according to different age and gender groups. Cornea 2008; 27: 1109–1113.
- Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Sideroudi H, et al. Impact of keratoconus, cross-linking and cross-linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on self-reported quality of life. Cornea 2012; 31: 734–739.
- Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 620–627.
- Hashemi H, Shaygan N, Asgari S, et al. ClearKone-Synergeyes or rigid gas-permeable contact lens in keratoconic patients: a clinical decision. Eye Contact Lens 2014; 40: 95–98.
- Khan M L. Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput Hum Behav 2017; 66: 236–247.
- Aslam S. YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts: omnicore. 2019. Available from: https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/
- Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. List of most popular websites. [ cited 2020 Dec 11]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_popular_websites
- Bae SS, Baxter S. YouTube videos in the English language as a patient education resource for cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol 2018; 38: 1941–1945.
- Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 2018; 4: e3.
- Fat MJ, Doja A, Barrowman N. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patient resource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol 2011; 26: 804–809.
- Hayanga AJ, Kaiser HE. Medical information on YouTube. JAMA 2008; 299: 1424–1425. author reply 1425.
- Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012; 39: 899–903.
- Allen A, Nguyen B, Nagalla R. Social media and the IUD—a YouTube content analysis. Contraception 2012; 86: 316.
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, et al. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Inform J 2015; 21: 173–194.
- Google. Google trends help. 2014 [cited 2014 Apr 25]. Available from: https://support.google.com/trends/
- Almarghoub MA, Alghareeb MA, Alhammad AK, et al. Plastic Surgery on YouTube. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8: e2586.
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, et al. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013; 18(8): e82469.
- Dutta A, Beriwal N, Van Breugel LM, et al. YouTube as a source of medical and epidemiological information during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of content across six languages around the globe. Cureus 2020; 12: e8622.
- Kuçuk B, Sirakaya E. An analysis of youtube videos as educational resources for patients about refractive surgery. Cornea 2020; 39: 491–494.
- Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43: 1334–1339.
- DISCERN: quality criteria for consumer health information. 1998 [cited 2012 Oct 30]. Available from: www.discern.org.uk/
- Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, et al. Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 2014; 82: e31–e9.
- Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor–let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244–1245.
- Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, et al. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2070–2077.
- Hernández-García I, Giménez-Júlvez T. Characteristics of YouTube Videos in Spanish on How to Prevent COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 4671.
- Mangan MS, Cakir A, Ocak SY, et al. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus 2020; 28: 175–180.
- Nielsen K, Hjortdal J, Aagaard NE, et al. Incidence and prevalence of keratoconus in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85: 890–892.
- Papali’i-Curtin AT, Cox R, Ma T, et al. Keratoconus prevalence among high school students in New Zealand. Cornea 2019; 38: 1382–1389.
- Millodot M, Shneor E, Albou S, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: a cross-sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011; 18: 91–97.
- Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 175: 169–172.
- Jones-Jordan LA, Walline JJ, Sinnott LT, et al. Asymmetry in Keratoconus and vision-related quality of life. Cornea 2013; 32: 267–272.
- Ye Y. A path analysis on correlates of consumer trust in online health information: evidence from the health information national trends survey. J Health Commun 2010; 15: 200–215.
- Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, et al. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis 2016; 22: 196–201.
- Guthrie G, Davies R, Fleming C, et al. YouTube as a source of information about retinitis pigmentosa. Eye 2014; 28: 499.
- Korkmaz YN, Buyuk SK. YouTube as a patient-information source for cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2020; 57: 327–332.