264
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures used in corneal transplantation: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 783-792 | Received 10 Jun 2021, Accepted 20 Jan 2022, Published online: 06 Mar 2022

References

  • Waldock A, Cook SD. Corneal transplantation: how successful are we? Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 813–815.
  • Dunbar GE, Titus M, Stein JD, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after corneal transplantation. Cornea 2021; 8: 08.
  • Tan DT, Dart JK, Holland EJ, et al. Corneal transplantation. Lancet 2012; 379: 1749–1761.
  • Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 209–218.
  • Fontana L, Parente G, Tassinari G. Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 117–124.
  • Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, et al. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 1818–1830.
  • Nanavaty MA, and Shortt AJ. Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 6: CD008420.
  • Vreijsen E, Elsman EBM, and van Nispen RMA, et al. Effect of corneal transplantation on patient-reported outcomes and potential predictors: a systematic review. Cornea 2020; 39: 1463–1472.
  • Stein JD. Disparities between ophthalmologists and their patients in estimating quality of life. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 238–243.
  • Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, et al. The activities of daily vision scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 2892–2899.
  • Garamendi E, Pesudovs K, Stevens MJ, et al. The refractive status and vision profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling. Vision Res 2006; 46: 1375–1383.
  • Norquist JM, Fitzpatrick R, Dawson J, et al. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Med Care 2004; 42: I25–36.
  • Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, et al. The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 663–674.
  • Petrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, et al. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health 2015; 18: 25–34.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.
  • Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 1171–1179.
  • Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 1147–1157.
  • Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 1159–1170.
  • Prem Senthil M, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in retinal diseases: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 546–582.
  • Bonnet C, Vazirnia P, Deng SX, et al. Sutured custom foldable silicone artificial iris implantation combined with intraocular lens implantation and penetrating keratoplasty: safety and efficacy outcomes. Cornea 2020; 21: 21.
  • Mendes F, Schaumberg DA, Navon S, et al. Assessment of visual function after corneal transplantation: the quality of life and psychometric assessment after corneal transplantation (Q-PACT) study. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 785–793.
  • Castellanos-Gonzalez JA, Orozco-Vega R, Gonzalez Ojeda A, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life related to vision after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2021; 96: 69–73.
  • Brahma A, Ennis F, Harper R, et al. Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 60–66.
  • Musch DC, Farjo AA, Meyer RF, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life after corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 124: 1–8.
  • Amiri F, Ghiyasvandian S, Haghani H. Vision-related quality of life after corneal transplantation. J Curr Ophthalmol 2020; 32: 154–158.
  • Castellucci M, Novara C, Casuccio A, et al. Bilateral ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty vs. bilateral penetrating keratoplasty in Fuchs’ dystrophy: corneal higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity and quality of life. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57: 3.
  • Puri S, Robinson SB, Wang J, et al. Vision-related impact on quality of life in an elderly patient population after corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2014; 33: 119–124.
  • Trousdale ER, Hodge DO, Baratz KH, et al. Vision-related quality of life before and after keratoplasty for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2147–2152.
  • Cheng YY, van den Berg TJ, Schouten JS, et al. Quality of vision after femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152: 556–566.e551.
  • Boisjoly H, Gresset J, Fontaine N, et al. The VF-14 index of functional visual impairment in candidates for a corneal graft. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128: 38–44.
  • Matsou A, Pujari R, Sarwar H, et al. Microthin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Cornea 2020; 3: 3.
  • Yildiz E, Toklu M, Turan Vural E. Vision-related quality of life before and after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens 2018; 44: 144–148.
  • van den Biggelaar FJ, Cheng YY, Nuijts RM, et al. Economic evaluation of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in The Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 449–459.e442.
  • Drzyzga K, Krupka-Matuszczyk I, Drzyzga L, et al. Quality of life and mental state after sight restoration by corneal transplantation. Psychosomatics 2016; 57: 414–422.
  • Guechi O, Lhuillier L, Houmad N, et al. Visual outcomes following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Eur J Ophthalmol 2017; 27: 513–519.
  • van der Meulen IJ, van Riet TC, Lapid-Gortzak R, et al. Correlation of straylight and visual acuity in long-term follow-up of manual descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2012; 31: 380–386.
  • Ang MJ, Chamberlain W, Lin CC, et al. Effect of unilateral endothelial keratoplasty on vision-related quality-of-life outcomes in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial (DETECT): a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137: 747–754.
  • Nielsen E, Ivarsen A, Kristensen S, et al. Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy: a controlled prospective study on visual recovery after endothelial keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94: 780–787.
  • Wong KH, Kam KW, Chen LJ, et al. Corneal blindness and current major treatment concern-graft scarcity. Int J Ophthalmol 2017; 10: 1154–1162.
  • Saunders PP, Sibley LM, Richards JS, et al. Outcome of corneal transplantation: can a prioritisation system predict outcome? Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 57–61.
  • Niziol LM, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients who received a corneal graft for keratoconus between 1980 and 1986. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 155: 213–219.e213.
  • Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1050–1058.
  • Pesudovs K, Gothwal VK, Wright T, et al. Remediating serious flaws in the national eye institute visual function questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 718–732.
  • McAlinden C, Skiadaresi E, Moore J, et al. Subscale assessment of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 5685–5694.
  • Yildiz EH, Cohen EJ, Virdi AS, et al. Quality of life in keratoconus patients after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 416-422.e411-412.
  • Miri A, Al-Deiri B, Dua HS. Long-term outcomes of autolimbal and allolimbal transplants. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1207–1213.
  • Fasolo A, Capuzzo C, Fornea M, et al. Health status and patient satisfaction after corneal graft: results from the corneal transplant epidemiological study. J Ophthalmol 2012; 2012: 230641.
  • Dunker SL, Dickman MM, Wisse RPL, et al. Quality of vision and vision-related quality of life after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Opthalmolog 2021; 12: 12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.