Level of appropriate primary diabetic eyecare delivered and achievable in optometry practices in Australia

References

• Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2007; 14: 179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman J, Keel S, Xie J, et al. The National Eye Health Survey. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick EK, Pesudovs K, Rees G, et al. The impact of diabetic retinopathy: understanding the patient’s perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 774–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas (8th Edition); Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. NHMRC Canberra; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2635–2645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Clinical Studies. Evidence–Practice Gaps Report. Melbourne; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L, et al. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefe CI, Weissman NW, Allison JJ, et al. Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: concepts and methodology. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10: 443–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castejón-Cervero MA, Jiménez-Parras R, Fernandez-Arias I, et al. Evaluation of compliance with the EGS guidelines in Spain, using Achievable Benchmarks of Care (ABC®) methodology: the IMCA study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011; 21: 149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon SS, Chee YE, Haddadin RI, et al. Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 440–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasler K, Moraes G, Wagner S, et al. One- and two-year visual outcomes from the Moorfields age-related macular degeneration database: a retrospective cohort study and an open science resource. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e027441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet EJ, Bredenhoff E, Sermeus W, et al. Exploring the relation between process design and efficiency in high-volume cataract pathways from a lean thinking perspective. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23: 83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nihalani BR, VanderVeen DK. Benchmarks for outcome indicators in pediatric cataract surgery. Eye 2017; 31: 417–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gude WT, Brown B, van der Veer SN, et al. Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence. Implementation Sci 2019; 14: 39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 1954; 7: 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh K, Hall M, Mittal V, et al. Establishing benchmarks for the hospitalized care of children with asthma, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia. Pediatrics 2014; 134: 555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, et al. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCTMs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract 1999; 5: 269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, et al. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 2871–2879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah R, Edgar D, Evans BJW. Measuring clinical practice. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Rahardjo D, Stapleton F, et al. Can the appropriateness of eye care be measured through cross-sectional retrospective patient record review in eye care practices in Australia? The iCareTrack feasibility study. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e024298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L, et al. iCareTrack: measuring the appropriateness of eyecare delivery in Australia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020; 40: 433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper P, Boucher MC, Cruess A, et al. Canadian ophthalmological society evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 2012; 47: S1-30, S31-54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of diabetes. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ting DSW, Ng JQ, Morlet N, et al. Diabetic retinopathy management by Australian optometrists. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 230–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J, et al. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Australian adults with self-reported diabetes: the national eye health survey. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 977–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey M, Gyawali R, Stapleton F, et al. Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of eye care by optometrists: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41: 782–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali R, Toomey M, Stapleton F, et al. Multiple things going on at the same time: determinants of appropriate primary diabetic eyecare delivery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2022; 42: 71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci 2011; 6: 42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1227–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, and Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2012: Cd000259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gocuk SA, J-h Lee, Keller PR, et al. Clinical audit as an educative tool for optometrists: an intervention study in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41: 53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich JR, Wentzloff JN, Imami NR, et al. Establishing a regional glaucoma physician collaborative to improve quality of care. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 179: 145–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maatouk CM, Hentati F, Urbano CA, et al. Effects of quality improvement education in diabetic retinopathy on routine clinical practice patterns of optometrists. Optom Vis Sci 2020; 97: 936–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes RP, Ballard DJ. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care–a challenge for PROs under the health care quality improvement program. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1995; 3: 15–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houston TK, Wall T, Allison JJ, et al. Implementing achievable benchmarks in preventive health: a controlled trial in residency education. Acad Med 2006; 81: 608–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar