Characteristics of myopic and hyperopic eyes in patients with antimetropia

References

• Rabin J, Van Sluyters R, Malach R. Emmetropisation: a vision-dependent phenomenon. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 20: 561–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer DL, Hansen RM, Moore BD et al. Cycloplegic refractions in healthy children aged 1 through 48 months. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1625–1628. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.11.1625.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015; 47: 86–106. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harb EN, Wildsoet CF. Origins of refractive errors: environmental and genetic factors. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2019; 5: 47–72. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-015027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft DI. Emmetropisation and the aetiology of refractive errors. Eye (Lond) 2014; 28: 169–179. doi:10.1038/eye.2013.276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaurisankar ZS, van Rijn GA, Lima JEE et al. Correlations between ocular biometrics and refractive error: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2019; 97: 735–743. doi:10.1111/aos.14208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi MA, Nowroozi A, Gouravani M et al. Associations of refractive errors and retinal changes measured by optical coherence tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol 2022; 67: 591–607. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Read SA et al. Myopic anisometropia: ocular characteristics and aetiological considerations. Clin Exp Optom 2014; 97: 291–307. doi:10.1111/cxo.12171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft I, McCullough S, Saunders K. What can anisometropia tell us about eye growth? Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105: 1211–1215. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo NW, Shen CJ, Sheu SJ. The ocular biometric and corneal topographic characteristics of high-anisometropic adults in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2011; 74: 310–315. doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2011.05.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozema JJ, Atchison DA, Tassignon M-J. Comparing methods to estimate the human lens power. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7937–7942. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal R, Salman M, Tan KA et al. Choroidal vascularity index (CVI)–A novel optical coherence tomography parameter for monitoring patients with panuveitis? PLoS One 2016; 11: e0146344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littmann H. Determination of the real size of an object on the fundus of the living eye. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1982; 180: 286–289. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1055068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF. Improvements on Littmann’s method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994; 232: 361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH et al. All biometric components are important in anisometropia, not just axial length. Br J Ophthalmol 2013; 97: 1586–1591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong L, Saw SM, Chia KS et al. Anisometropia in Singapore school children. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 474–479. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cankurtaran V, Tekin K, Şimşek M et al. Interocular comparison of anterior and posterior segment findings and laterality in hyperopic anisometropia. Eye Contact Lens 2018; 44: 29–34. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney LG, Mainstone JC, Henderson BA. Corneal topography and myopia. A cross-sectional study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 311–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren R, Morgan IG, Nangia V et al. Crystalline lens power and refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 543–550. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhu X et al. Corneal and lenticular biometry in Chinese children with myopia. Clin Exp Optom 2022; 2022: 1–9. doi:10.1080/08164622.2022.2116269.
   Google Scholar
• van AG. On emmetropia and ametropia. Opt Acta (Lond) 1961; 142: 1–92. doi:10.1159/000304181.
   Google Scholar
• Yau GS, Lee JW, Woo TT et al. Central macular thickness in children with myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia: an optical coherence tomography study. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 847694. doi:10.1155/2015/847694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşkıran Çömez A, Şanal Ulu E, Ekim Y. Retina and optic disc characteristics in amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes of patients with myopic or hyperopic anisometropia. Turk J Ophthalmol 2017; 47: 28–33. doi:10.4274/tjo.54289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aydemir GA, Bayat AH, Aydemir E et al. Comparison of the retinal and choroidal structures in 3 refractive groups. Beyoglu Eye J 2021; 6: 90–95. doi:10.14744/bej.2021.47568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu PC, Chen YJ, Chen CH et al. Assessment of macular retinal thickness and volume in normal eyes and highly myopic eyes with third-generation optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 551–555. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Yan YN, Zhang Q et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in association with gamma zone width and disc-fovea distance. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100: 632–639. doi:10.1111/aos.15088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas RA, Wang YX, Yang H et al. Optic disc-fovea distance, axial length and parapapillary zones. The Beijing Eye Study 2011. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0138701. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita T, Sakamoto T, Terasaki H et al. Association of retinal thickness and optic disc-to-fovea angle to axial length of young healthy eyes. Clin Ophthalmol 2015; 9: 2235–2241. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S93197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang SH, Hong SW, Im SK et al. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 4075–4083. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öner V, Özgür G, Türkyilmaz K et al. Effect of axial length on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014; 24: 265–272. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z, Yilmaz OF. Influence of scan radius correction for ocular magnification and relationship between scan radius with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2001; 10: 163–169. doi:10.1097/00061198-200106000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SW, Ahn MD, Kang SH et al. Analysis of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber distribution in normal young adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 3515–3523. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ctori I, Gruppetta S, Huntjens B. The effects of ocular magnification on Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography scan length. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 733–738. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2915-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ et al. Choroidal thickness in myopic and nonmyopic children assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7578–7586. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhang G, Shen M et al. Assessment of choroidal vascularity and choriocapillaris blood perfusion in anisomyopic adults by SS-OCT/OCTA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021; 62: 8. doi:10.1167/iovs.62.1.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Niu L, Guo J et al. Quantitative evaluation of retinal and choroidal vascularity and retrobulbar blood flow in patients with myopic anisometropia by CDI and OCTA. Br J Ophthalmol 2022; doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevher S, Üçer MB, Şahin T. How does anisometropia affect the choroidal vascularity index? Indian J Ophthalmol 2022; 70: 2043–2049. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_3092_21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett BT, Bradley A, Candy TR. The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 36: 120–158. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Weih LM, Fu CL et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and associated refractive errors in an adult population in Victoria, Australia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2000; 7: 249–258. doi:10.1076/0928-6586(200012)741-YFT249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanlamai T, Goss DA. Prevalence of monocular amblyopia among anisometropes. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1979; 56: 704–715. doi:10.1097/00006324-197911000-00006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preslan MW, Novak A. Baltimore vision screening project. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 105–109. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30753-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Read SA. Progressive adult antimetropia. Clin Exp Optom 2014; 97: 375–378. doi:10.1111/cxo.12129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt E, Lyhne N, Lam CSY. Ocular anisometropia and laterality. Acta Ophthalmol 2004; 82: 175–178. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2004.00230.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar