Longstanding effects of continuous theta burst stimulation in adult amblyopes

References

• Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: a mini-review. Vision Res 2015; 114: 17–30. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer D, McKee SP. Classification and diversity of amblyopia. Vis Neurosci 2018; 35: E012. doi:10.1017/S0952523817000190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C. Amblyopia. Br Med J 2009; 2009: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi NR, Rodriguez MLFR. Amblyopia. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75: 361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM. Rethinking amblyopia 2020. Vision Res 2020; 176: 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2020.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuna AR, Pinto N, Brardo FM et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in adults with amblyopia. J Neuro-Ophthalmology 2020; 40: 185–192. doi:10.1097/WNO.0000000000000828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cui L, He Z et al. On the relationship between sensory eye dominance and stereopsis in the normal-sighted adult population: normative data. Front Hum Neurosci 2018; 12: 1–8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beylerian M, Hess RF, Matonti F et al. Interocular suppressive interactions in amblyopia depend on spatial frequency. Vision Res 2020; 168: 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Reynaud A, Yao Z et al. Amblyopic suppression: passive attenuation, enhanced dichoptic masking by the fellow eye or reduced dichoptic masking by the amblyopic eye? Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci 2018; 59: 4190. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-24206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong L, Reynaud A, Wang Z et al. Interocular suppression as revealed by dichoptic masking is orientation-dependent and imbalanced in amblyopia. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci 2020; 61: 28. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.14.28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker AT, Jalinous R. Non - invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 325: 1106–1107. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4.
   Google Scholar
• Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO et al. Possible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 1–14. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaucheur J-P, Aleman A, Baeken C et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131: 474–528. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson B, Mansouri B, Koski L et al. Brain plasticity in the adult: modulation of Function in Amblyopia with rTMS. Curr Biol 2008; 18: 1067–1071. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 145–156. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00321-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendam JM, Ramakers GMJ, Di Lazzaro V. Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul 2010; 3: 95–118. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavagnier S, Thompson B, Hess RF. Long lasting effects of daily theta burst rTMS sessions in the human amblyopic cortex. Brain Stimul 2013; 6: 860–867. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuna AR, Pinto N, Fernandes A et al. Theta burst stimulation in adults with symmetric and asymmetric visual acuity. Int Ophthalmol 42: 2785–2799. doi:10.1007/s10792-022-02269-7.Epub ahead of print 30 March 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuna AR, Carrega FNA, Nunes A. Interocular suppression. Proc Spie. 2017; 10453: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Lam CSY, Yu M et al. Quantifying Sensory eye dominance in the normal visual system: a new technique and insights into variation across traditional tests. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6875. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 120: 323–330.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi E, Lunghi C, Morrone MC. Neuroplasticity in adult human visual cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020; 112: 542–552. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale A. Gabaergic inhibition in visual cortical plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci 2010; 4: 1–6. doi:10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.15.00035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harauzov A, Spolidoro M, DiCristo G et al. Reducing intracortical inhibition in the adult visual cortex promotes ocular dominance plasticity. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 361–371. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2233-09.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton MA, Schuman EM. Dendritic protein synthesis, synaptic plasticity, and memory. Cell 2006; 127: 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffau H. Brain plasticity: from pathophysiological mechanisms to therapeutic applications. J Clin Neurosci 2006; 13: 885–897. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SW, Hill AT, Rogasch NC et al. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016; 63: 43–64. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franca M, Koch G, Mochizuki H et al. Effects of theta burst stimulation protocols on phosphene threshold. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 1808–1813. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulla R, Liegey-Dougall A. A systematic review of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex areas as a migraine preventive treatment. Cephalalgia Reports 2019; 2: 251581631988997. doi:10.1177/2515816319889971.
   Google Scholar
• Kar SK. Predictors of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: a review of recent updates. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2019; 17: 25–33. doi:10.9758/cpn.2019.17.1.25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar