Tear meniscus height agreement and reproducibility between two corneal topographers and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

References

• Wei A, Le Q, Hong J et al. Assessment of lower tear meniscus. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1420–1425. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15: 334–365. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15: 276–283. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim J, Wang MTM, Craig JP. Evaluating the diagnostic ability of two automated non-invasive tear film stability measurement techniques. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44: 101–362. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbaut A, Liang H, Denoyer A et al. Analyse du film lacrymal et évaluation de sa qualité optique : une revue de la littérature. J Fr Ophtalmol 2019; 42: 226–243. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2018.10.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang MTM, Craig JP. Natural history of dry eye disease: perspectives from inter-ethnic comparison studies. Ocul Surf 2019; 17: 424–433. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2019.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15: 539–574. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Plaza E, Molina-Martín A, Piñero DP. Agreement of tear break-up time and meniscus height between medmont e300 and visionix VX120+. Appl Sci 2022; 12: 45–89. doi:10.3390/app12094589.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Shen M, Wang J et al. Clinical significance of tear menisci in dry eye. Eye Contact Lens Sci Clin Pract 2012; 38: 183–187. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318252ce0c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AK, Tai SK, Chan JK et al. Lower tear meniscus height measurements using keratography and swept-source optical coherence tomography and effect of fluorescein instillation methods. Curr Eye Res 2019; 44: 1203–1208. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1629598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh S, Tung C, Kottaiyan R et al. Effect of airflow exposure on the tear meniscus. J Ophthalmol 2012; 2012: 1–6. doi:10.1155/2012/983182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagahara Y, Koh S, Maeda N et al. Prominent decrease of tear meniscus height with contact lens wear and efficacy of eye drop instillation. Eye Contact Lens Sci Clin Pract 2015; 41: 318–322. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Resúa C, Pena-Verdeal H, Remeseiro B et al. Correlation between tear osmolarity and tear meniscus. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1419–1429. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedernolte B, Trunk L, Wolffsohn JS et al. Evaluation of tear meniscus height using different clinical methods. Clin Exp Optom 2021; 104: 583–588. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1878854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura H, Tabuchi H, Nakakura S et al. Usability and reproducibility of tear meniscus values generated via swept-source optical coherence tomography and the slit lamp with a graticule method. Int Ophthalmol 2018; 38: 679–686. doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0517-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Comparison between graticule and image capture assessment of lower tear film meniscus height. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 169–173. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.05.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawai M, Yamada M, Kawashima M et al. Quantitative evaluation of tear meniscus height from fluorescein photographs. Cornea 2007; 26: 403–406. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318033c242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek J, Doh SH, Chung SK. Comparison of tear meniscus height measurements obtained with the keratograph and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in dry eye. Cornea 2015; 34: 1209–1213. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandlitz S, Purslow C, Murphy PJ et al. Comparison of a new portable digital meniscometer and optical coherence tomography in tear meniscus radius measurement. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92: 112–118. doi:10.1111/aos.12275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Zhu X, Liu Y et al. TMIS: a new image‐based software application for the measurement of tear meniscus height. Acta Ophthalmol 2019; 97: 973–980. doi:10.1111/aos.14107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoi N, Bron A, Tiffany J et al. Reflective meniscometry: a non-invasive method to measure tear meniscus curvature. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 92–97. doi:10.1136/bjo.83.1.92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binotti WW, Bayraktutar B, Ozmen MC et al. A review of imaging biomarkers of the ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens Sci Clin Pract 2020; 46: S84–105. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor E, Hagyó K, Resch M et al. Comparison of tearscope-plus versus slit lamp measurements of inferior tear meniscus height in normal individuals. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010; 20: 819–824. doi:10.1177/112067211002000502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canan H, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Ulas B et al. Interexaminer reproducibility of optical coherence tomography for measuring the tear film meniscus. Curr Eye Res 2014; 39: 1145–1150. doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.898311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama R, Usui T, Yamagami S. Diagnosis of dry eye by tear meniscus measurements using anterior segment swept source optical coherence tomography. Cornea [Internet] 2015; 34: S115–20. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinzawa M, Dogru M, Miyasaka K et al. Application of CASIA SS-1000 optical coherence tomography tear meniscus imaging in testing the efficacy of new strip meniscometry in dry eye diagnosis. Eye Contact Lens Sci Clin Pract 2018; 44: S44–9. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xu Z, Gong Q et al. The role of different tear volume detection methods in the evaluation and diagnosis of mild dry eye disease. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11: 15. doi:10.1167/tvst.11.3.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriola-Villalobos P, Fernández-Vigo JI, Díaz-Valle D et al. Assessment of lower tear meniscus measurements obtained with keratograph and agreement with Fourier-domain optical-coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99: 1120–1125. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer JF, Leitgeb R, Wojtkowski M. Twenty-five years of optical coherence tomography: the paradigm shift in sensitivity and speed provided by Fourier domain OCT [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 2017 Jun 15; 8: 3248–3280. doi:10.1364/BOE.8.003248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Cello L, Pellegrini M, Vagge A et al. Advances in the noninvasive diagnosis of dry eye disease. Appl Sci 2021; 11: 10384. doi:10.3390/app112110384.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Terraza AL, Jimenez-Collado D, Sanchez-Sanoja F et al. Reliability, repeatability, and accordance between three different corneal diagnostic imaging devices for evaluating the ocular surface. Front Med 2022; 9: 1–7. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.893688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian L, Qu J, Zhang X et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of noninvasive keratograph 5m measurements in patients with dry eye disease. J Ophthalmol 2016; 2016: 1–6. doi:10.1155/2016/8013621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G et al. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen M, Wang J, Tao A et al. Diurnal variation of upper and lower tear menisci. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 801–806. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Laiquzzaman M, Button NF. Video-assessment of tear meniscus height in elderly caucasians and its relationship to the exposed ocular surface. Curr Eye Res 2001; 22: 420–426. doi:10.1076/ceyr.22.6.420.5487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan DF, Mieler WF, Hariprasad SM. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a comparison of modern high-resolution retinal Imaging Systems. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 18–31. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Wei A, Xu J et al. Application of keratograph and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in measurements of tear meniscus height. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 13–43. doi:10.3390/jcm11051343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ Publ Gr 1996; 313: 106–106. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7049.106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–160. doi:10.1177/096228029900800204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar