Non-invasive brain stimulation and vision rehabilitation: a clinical perspective

References

• Merton PA, Morton HB. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature 1980; 285: 227. doi:10.1038/285227a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106–1107. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebner HR, Funke K, Aberra AS et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: what is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 140: 59–97. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F et al. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002; 125: 2238–2247. doi:10.1093/brain/awf238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Jaussi W, Liebetanz D et al. Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29: 1573–1578. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YZ, Chen RS, Rothwell JC et al. The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 1028–1032. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Steinhoff BJ et al. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol 1996; 40: 367–378. doi:10.1002/ana.410400306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Bestmann S, Constantinescu AO et al. Relationship between physiological measures of excitability and levels of glutamate and GABA in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 2011; 589: 5845–5855. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.216978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtiar V, Near J, Johansen-Berg H et al. Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Elife 2015; 4: e08789. doi:10.7554/eLife.08789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fertonani A, Pirulli C, Miniussi C. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 15416–15423. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Paulus W. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 317. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai R, Paulus W, Walsh V. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1551–1554. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Voroslakos M, Kronberg G et al. Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 5092. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07233-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello UM, Wang J, Park ASY et al. Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci 2023; 17: 1119200. doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1119200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bikson M, Badran BW et al. A visual and narrative timeline of US FDA milestones for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) devices. Brain Stimul 2022; 15: 73–75. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perin C, Vigano B, Piscitelli D et al. Non-invasive current stimulation in vision recovery: a review of the literature. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2020; 38: 239–250. doi:10.3233/RNN-190948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marg E, Rudiak D. Phosphenes induced by magnetic stimulation over the occipital brain: description and probable site of stimulation. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 301–311. doi:10.1097/00006324-199405000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner S, Demmer I, Ziemann U. Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole. Exp Brain Res 1998; 118: 19–26. doi:10.1007/s002210050251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corthout E, Uttl B, Walsh V et al. Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 2631–2634. doi:10.1097/00001756-199908200-00035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wassermann EM et al. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 1994; 117: 847–858. doi:10.1093/brain/117.4.847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E et al. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005; 45: 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Duarte I, Gebodh N, Schestatsky P et al. Chapter 2 - transcranial electrical stimulation: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). In: Cohen Kadosh R, editor. The stimulated brain. San Diego: Academic Press; 2014. p. 35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000; 527: 633–639. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai R, Chaieb L, Antal A et al. Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Curr Biol 2008; 18: 1839–1843. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Yau CE, Mai AS et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation and its effects on cognition and the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2022; 13: 20406223221140390. doi:10.1177/20406223221140390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terney D, Chaieb L, Moliadze V et al. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 14147–14155. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-08.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011; 17: 37–53. doi:10.1177/1073858410386614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafi MM, Westover MB, Fox MD et al. Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging. Eur J Neurosci 2012; 35: 805–825. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08035.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson B, Mansouri B, Koski L et al. Brain plasticity in the adult: modulation of function in amblyopia with rTMS. Curr Biol 2008; 18: 1067–1071. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavagnier S, Thompson B, Hess RF. Long lasting effects of daily theta burst rTMS sessions in the human amblyopic cortex. Brain Stimul 2013; 6: 860–867. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel DP, Byblow WD, Hess RF et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation transiently improves contrast sensitivity and normalizes visual cortex activation in individuals with amblyopia. J Neurol Rehabil 2013; 27: 760–769. doi:10.1177/1545968313491006
   Google Scholar
• Tuna AR, Pinto N, Brardo FM et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in adults with amblyopia. J Neuroophthalmol 2020; 40: 185–192. doi:10.1097/WNO.0000000000000828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plow EB, Obretenova SN, Halko MA et al. Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: a comparative case study. PM R 2011; 3: 825–835. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raveendran RN, Chow A, Tsang K et al. Reduction of collinear inhibition in observers with central vision loss using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: a case series. Brain Stimul 2021; 14: 207–208. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.12.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol 1970; 206: 419–436. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensch TK, Quinlan EM. Critical periods in amblyopia. Vis Neurosci 2018; 35: E014. doi:10.1017/S0952523817000219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka MX. Amblyopia outcomes through clinical trials and practice measurement: room for improvement: the LXXVII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 219: A1–A26. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker MP, Lowel S. Amblyopia: new molecular/pharmacological and environmental approaches. Vis Neurosci 2018; 35: E018. doi:10.1017/S0952523817000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart RM, Xiao W, McClenahan LJ et al. Electrical stimulation of visual cortex can immediately improve spatial vision. Current Biology 2016; 26: 1867–1872. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft A, Roehmel J, Olma MC et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry. Exp Brain Res 2010; 207: 283–290. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2453-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens JR, Kraft A, Irlbacher K et al. Long-lasting enhancement of visual perception with repetitive noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci 2017; 11: 238. doi:10.3389/fncel.2017.00238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglini L, Contemori G, Penzo S et al. tRNS effects on visual contrast detection. Neurosci Lett 2020; 717: 134696. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito GA, Senti T, Cazzoli D et al. Cathodal HD-tDCS on the right V5 improves motion perception in humans. Front Behav Neurosci 2015; 9: 257. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglini L, Noventa S, Casco C. Anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over V5 improves motion perception by signal enhancement and noise reduction. Brain Stimul 2017; 10: 773–779. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Li C, Liu N et al. Visual motion perception improvements following direct current stimulation over V5 are dependent on initial performance. Exp Brain Res 2020; 238: 2409–2416. doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05842-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong G, Wang Y, Chen X. Anodal occipital tDCS enhances spontaneous alpha activity. Neurosci Lett 2020; 721: 134796. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazono H, Ogata K, Takeda A et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation of α but not β frequency sharpens multiple visual functions. Brain Stimul 2020; 13: 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermott AB, Mayer ML, Westbrook GL et al. NMDA-receptor activation increases cytoplasmic calcium concentration in cultured spinal cord neurones. Nature 1986; 321: 519–522. doi:10.1038/321519a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo NH, Teng HK, Siao CJ et al. Activation of p75NTR by proBDNF facilitates hippocampal long-term depression. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1069–1077. doi:10.1038/nn1510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheeran B, Talelli P, Mori F et al. A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS. J Physiol 2008; 586: 5717–5725. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.159905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron 2010; 66: 198–204. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale A, Berardi N, Spolidoro M et al. GABAergic inhibition in visual cortical plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci 2010; 4: 10. doi:10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.15.00035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmarkar UR, Dan Y. Experience-dependent plasticity in adult visual cortex. Neuron 2006; 52: 577–585. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen CP, Dunkley BT, Muthukumaraswamy SD et al. Enhanced awareness followed reversible inhibition of human visual cortex: a combined TMS, MRS and MEG study. PLOS ONE 2014; 9: e100350. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafique SA, Steeves JKE. Assessing differential effects of single and accelerated low-frequency rTMS to the visual cortex on GABA and glutamate concentrations. Brain Behav 2020; 10: e01845. doi:10.1002/brb3.1845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoby KS, Rafique SA, Oeltzschner G et al. Continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation to the visual cortex do not alter GABA and glutamate concentrations measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Behav 2022; 12: e2478. doi:10.1002/brb3.2478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Heise KF, Chalavi S et al. The role of MRS-assessed GABA in human behavioral performance. Prog Neurobiol 2022; 212: 102247. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale A, Maya Vetencourt JF, Medini P et al. Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 679–681. doi:10.1038/nn1899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulsara A, Jacobs EW, Zhou T et al. Stochastic resonance in a single neuron model: theory and analog simulation. J Theor Biol 1991; 152: 531–555. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80396-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Groen O, Wenderoth N. Transcranial random noise stimulation of visual cortex: stochastic resonance enhances central mechanisms of perception. J Neurosci 2016; 36: 5289–5298. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4519-15.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Groen O, Tang MF, Wenderoth N et al. Stochastic resonance enhances the rate of evidence accumulation during combined brain stimulation and perceptual decision-making. PLOS Comput Biol 2018; 14: e1006301. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkor R, Silva AE, Teske C et al. Repetitive visual cortex transcranial random noise stimulation in adults with amblyopia. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 3029. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80843-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea LA, Spritzer MD, Barker JM et al. Gonadal hormone modulation of hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult. Hippocampus 2006; 16: 225–232. doi:10.1002/hipo.20154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen BS. How do sex and stress hormones affect nerve cells? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1994; 743: 1–16; discussion 17–18. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb55784.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaieb L, Antal A, Paulus W. Gender-specific modulation of short-term neuroplasticity in the visual cortex induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Vis Neurosci 2008; 25: 77–81. doi:10.1017/S0952523808080097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Pasqualetti P et al. Age dependence of primary motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 675–682. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inghilleri M, Conte A, Curra A et al. Ovarian hormones and cortical excitability. An rTMS study in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 1063–1068. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Chaieb L, Moliadze V et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms shape cortical plasticity in humans. Brain Stimul 2010; 3: 230–237. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lulic T, El-Sayes J, Fassett HJ et al. Physical activity levels determine exercise-induced changes in brain excitability. PLOS ONE 2017; 12: e0173672. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendy AM, Andrushko JW, Della Gatta PA et al. Acute effects of high-intensity aerobic exercise on motor cortical excitability and inhibition in sedentary adults. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 814633. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale MV, Ridding MC, Nordstrom MA. Cortisol inhibits neuroplasticity induction in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 8285–8293. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1963-08.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92: 66–72. doi:10.1152/jn.00383.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte A, Gilio F, Iezzi E et al. Attention influences the excitability of cortical motor areas in healthy humans. Exp Brain Res 2007; 182: 109–117. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0975-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd G, Kimber TE, Ridding MC et al. Reduced motor cortex plasticity following inhibitory rTMS in older adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 441–447. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 2008–2039. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M et al. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 1774–1809. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S et al. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: expert guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132: 269–306. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM et al. Screening questionnaire before TMS: an update. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 1686. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasschau M, Reisner J, Sherman K et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation is feasible for remotely supervised home delivery in multiple sclerosis. Neuromodulation 2016; 19: 824–831. doi:10.1111/ner.12430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Winckel AV, Carey JR, Bisson TA et al. Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation plus tracking training therapy in people with stroke: an open-label feasibility study. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2018; 15: 83. doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0427-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M et al. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: a guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul 2020; 13: 686–693. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Z, Li J, Spiegel DP et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity and visual evoked potential amplitude in adults with amblyopia. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 19280. doi:10.1038/srep19280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocci T, Nasini F, Caleo M et al. Unilateral application of cathodal tDCS reduces transcallosal inhibition and improves visual acuity in amblyopic patients. Front Behav Neurosci 2018; 12: 109. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plow EB, Obretenova SN, Jackson ML et al. Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuromodulation 2012; 15: 367–373. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00440.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plow EB, Obretenova SN, Fregni F et al. Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. J Neurol Rehabil 2012; 26: 616–626. doi:10.1177/1545968311431963
   Google Scholar
• Alber R, Moser H, Gall C et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and vision restoration training in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. PM R 2017; 9: 787–794. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larcombe SJ, Kulyomina Y, Antonova N et al. Visual training in hemianopia alters neural activity in the absence of behavioural improvement: a pilot study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018; 38: 538–549. doi:10.1111/opo.12584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raty S, Borrmann C, Granata G et al. Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: an exploratory randomized trial (REVIS). Restor Neurol Neurosci 2021; 39: 221–235. doi:10.3233/RNN-211198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AE, Lyu A, Leat SJ et al. A differential effect of visual cortex tDCS on reading of English and Chinese in patients with central vision loss. Brain Stimul 2022; 15: 1215–1217. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2022.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel DP, Li J, Hess RF et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances recovery of stereopsis in adults with amblyopia. Neurotherapeutics 2013; 10: 831–839. doi:10.1007/s13311-013-0200-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 861–872. doi:10.1038/nrn2735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniglia M, Pavan A, Cuturi LF et al. Reducing crowding by weakening inhibitory lateral interactions in the periphery with perceptual learning. PLOS ONE 2011; 6: e25568. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveendran RN, Tsang K, Tiwana D et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces collinear lateral inhibition in normal peripheral vision. PLOS ONE 2020; 15: e0232276. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar