The role of extended reality in optometry education: a narrative review

References

• Rooney D, Hopwood N, Boud D, et al. The role of simulation in pedagogies of higher education for the health professions: through a practice-based lens. Vocat Learn 2015; 8: 269–285. doi:10.1007/s12186-015-9138-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper L, Orrell J, Bowden M. Work integrated learning: a guide to effective practice. 1st ed. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvelainen M, Cooper S, Jones J. Nursing students’ educational experience in regional Australia: reflections on acute events. A qualitative review of clinical incidents. Nurse Educ Pract 2018; 31: 188–193. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2018.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack K, Hamshire C, Harris WE, et al. “My mentor didn’t speak to me for the first four weeks”: perceived unfairness experienced by nursing students in clinical practice settings. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27: 929–938. doi:10.1111/jocn.14015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobecker PA. A sense of belonging and perceived stress among baccalaureate nursing students in clinical placements. Nurse Educ Today 2016; 36: 178–183. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie SS, Helle N, Sletteland NV, et al. Implementation of virtual reality in health professions education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ 2023; 9: e41589. doi:10.2196/41589
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samadbeik M, Yaaghobi D, Bastani P, et al. The applications of virtual reality technology in medical groups teaching. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2018; 6: 123–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin Y, Wang X, Wu F, et al. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill. J Biomed Inform 2014; 48: 122–129. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh GM, Lamparter J, Sullivan PM, et al. The international forum of ophthalmic simulation: developing a virtual reality training curriculum for ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 2013; 97: 789–792. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerling KA. Cost-utility analysis of virtual and mannequin-based simulation. Simul Healthc 2018; 13: 33–40. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodman-Pieterse EC, De Souza NJ, Vincent SJ. The influence of a novel simulated learning environment upon student clinical subjective refraction performance: a pilot study. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 342–349. doi:10.1111/cxo.12374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts E, Kaak V, Rolley J. Simulation to replace clinical hours in nursing: a meta-narrative review. Clin Simul Nurs 2019; 37: 5–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2019.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De R, Pandey N, Pal A. Impact of digital surge during COVID-19 pandemic: a viewpoint on research and practice. Int J Inf Manage 2020; 55: 102171. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen ASS. Intraocular surgery – assessment and transfer of skills using a virtual‐reality simulator. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95: 1–22. doi:10.1111/aos.13505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCANZ. Accreditation standards and evidence guide for entry-level optometry programs. Optometry council of Australia and New Zealand, 2023. [accessed 2024 Feb 9]. https://ocanz.org/assets/Accreditation/7c3f0e44fc/OCANZ-Accreditation-Standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Adams SL, Wyles E. A novel approach to clinical education through distance learning. J Optometric Ed 2020; 49: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr S. Remote learning adaptations in optometric clinical education. Coll Univ 2022; 97: 53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Alhazmi MS, Butler CW, Junghans BM. Does the virtual refractor patient-simulator improve student competency when refracting in the consulting room? Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101: 771–777. doi:10.1111/cxo.12800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein C. Virtual reality design: how upcoming head-mounted displays change design paradigms of virtual reality worlds. MediaTropes 2016; 6: 52–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan AD, Cruit J, Endsley M, et al. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: a meta-analysis. Hum Factors 2021; 63: 706–726. doi:10.1177/0018720820904229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieves M, Vickers J. Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen F-J, Flumerfelt S, Alves A, editors. Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems: new findings and approaches. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 85–113.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw-Aagaard M, editor. The Oxford handbook of virtuality. Online ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cant R, Cooper S, Sussex R, et al. What’s in a name? Clarifying the nomenclature of virtual simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2019; 27: 26–30. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram P, Colquhoun H. A taxonomy of real and virtual world display integration. In: Ohta Y, and Tamura H, editors. Mixed reality: merging real and virtual worlds. Vol. 1. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Violato E, MacPherson J, Edwards M, et al. The use of simulation best practices when investigating virtual simulation in health care: a scoping review. Clin Simul Nurs 2023; 79: 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts PI, Rossler K, Bowler F, et al. Onward and upward: introducing the healthcare simulation standards of best practice. Clin Simul Nurs 2021; 58: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough S, Yohannes AM, Murray J. The integrated simulation and technology enhanced learning (ISETL) framework: facilitating robust design, implementation, evaluation and research in healthcare. Physiotherapy 2016; 102: e27–e28. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2016.10.039
   Google Scholar
• Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach 2013; 35: e1511–e1530. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewat S, Penman A, Davidson B, et al. A framework to support the development of quality simulation‐based learning programmes in speech–language pathology. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2020; 55: 287–300. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman T, Sandefur C, Morris CT. Developing interpersonal and counseling skills through mixed-reality simulation in communication sciences and disorders. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2021; 6: 416–428. doi:10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00118
   Google Scholar
• Nestel D, Gough S. Educating for professional practice through simulation. In: Delaney C, Molloy E, editors. Learning and teaching in clinical contexts: a practical guide. Chatswood: Elsevier; 2018. p. 175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Nestel D, Gough S. Designing simulation-based learning activities: a systematic approach. In: Nestel D, Kelly M, Jolly B, Watson M, editors. Healthcare simulation education. Oxford: Wiley; 2017. p. 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003â??2009. Medical Education 2010; 44: 50–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. The scientific study of expert levels of performance: general implications for optimal learning and creativity 1. High Abil Stud 1998; 9: 75–100. doi:10.1080/1359813980090106
   Google Scholar
• Wayne D, Butter J, Siddall V, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 251–256. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00341.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd ed. New Jersey: FT Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett DS, Yang M, Wymbs NF, et al. Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems. Nat Neurosci 2015; 18: 744–751. doi:10.1038/nn.3993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige JB, Daley BJ. Situated cognition: a learning framework to support and guide high-fidelity simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2009; 5: e97–e103. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.120
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick TJ Experiential learning: a theoretical critique from five perspectives. Information Series No. 385. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Duvivier RJ, van Dalen J, Muijtjens AM, et al. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of clinical skills. BMC Med Educ 2011; 11: 1–7. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perretta JS, Duval-Arnould J, Poling S, et al. Best practices and theoretical foundations for simulation instruction using rapid-cycle deliberate practice. Simul Healthc 2020; 15: 356–362. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crochet P, Aggarwal R, Dubb SS, et al. Deliberate practice on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator enhances the quality of surgical technical skills. Annal Surg 2011; 253: 1216–1222. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182197016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berragan L. Simulation: an effective pedagogical approach for nursing? Nurse Educ Today 2011; 31: 660–663. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal S, Shinde L, Madheswaran G, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Indian optometrists: a student, educator, and practitioner’s perspective. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021; 69: 958–963. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_3386_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonuscheit S, Lam AK, Schmid KL, et al. COVID‐19: ensuring safe clinical teaching at university optometry schools. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41: 144–156. doi:10.1111/opo.12764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan T, Abou-Issa R, Kim G, et al. Digital technologies easing the learning curve in the transition to practicum. J Inf Technol Educ 2022; 22: 91–107. doi:10.28945/5156
   Google Scholar
• Rajhans V, Memon U, Patil V, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on academic activities and way forward in Indian optometry. J Optom 2020; 13: 216–226. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2020.06.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortenbacher DL, Bartolini A, Dornbos B, et al. Vision therapy and virtual reality applications. Adv Ophthalmol Optom 2018; 3: 39–59. doi:10.1016/j.yaoo.2018.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Charlesworth M, Elrakhawy M. How to write a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2023; 78: 1162–1166. doi:10.1111/anae.16016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev 2019; 4: 5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant MM. Difficulties in defining mobile learning: analysis, design characteristics, and implications. Educ Technol Res Dev 2019; 67: 361–388. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-09641-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Strategies for qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2003. p. 509–535.
   Google Scholar
• Wei L, Najdovski Z, Nahavandi S, et al. Towards a haptically enabled optometry training simulator. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform 2014; 3: 60. doi:10.1007/s13721-014-0060-3
   Google Scholar
• Yi J. Research and application of optometry retinoscopy teaching based on three-dimensional simulation. Rom Rev Precis Mech Optics Mechatron 2016: 58.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson HA, Giannoni AG, Berntsen DA. Student performance and perceptions following incorporation of eyesi indirect simulators into the optometric curriculum. J Optometric Ed 2017; 42: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pancholi BR, Dunne MCM. Virtual patient instruction and self-assessment accuracy in optometry students. J Optometric Ed 2018; 43: 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Isikguner B, Umaefulam V. Game-based approach to teaching and learning in optometry education. J Game Game Art Gamification 2019; 4: 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chu R, Lu E, Lee J. Assessment of competency following use of eyesi indirect ophthalmoscope simulators within a first-year optometric curriculum. Optom Educ 2020; 45: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Douglass A, Cham KM, Jaworski A, et al. The equivalency of the binocular indirect ophthalmoscope simulator to peer practice: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2021; 98: 1239–1247. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar A, Macfarlane S, Kiddell E, et al. The perceived value and impact of virtual simulation-based education on students’ learning: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22: 823. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03912-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar AK, Armitage JA, Arambewela-Colley N, et al. Virtual simulated international placements as an innovation for internationalisation in undergraduate programs: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23: 258. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04260-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar A, Ainge L, Backhouse S, et al. A cohort study for the development and validation of a reflective inventory to quantify diagnostic reasoning skills in optometry practice. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22: 536. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03493-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doron R, Eichler R, Rajhans V. Effectiveness of online learning in improving optometry student’s reflective abilities. J Optom 2023; 16: 199–205. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2022.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aukes LC, Geertsma J, Cohen-Schotanus J, et al. The development of a scale to measure personal reflection in medical practice and education. Med Teach 2007; 29: 177–182. doi:10.1080/01421590701299272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar AK, Armitage JA, Chong LX, et al. Breaking boundaries and opening borders by clicking into an inclusive virtual simulated learning environment. Educ Inf Technol 2023. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12369-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke JB SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Optometry Australia. Entry-level competency standards for optometry. 2022 [accessed 2024 Feb 9]. https://www.optometry.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Professional_support/Guidelines/Final_Entry-level-Competency-Standard-for-Optometry-2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Strabismus Simulator OF. American academy of ophthalmology, 2015. [accessed 2024 Feb 9]. https://www.aao.org/education/interactive-tool/strabismus-simulator.
   Google Scholar
• Orge FE, Epley D Retinoscopy simulator. American academy of ophthalmology, 2020. [accessed 2024 Feb 9]. https://www.aao.org/education/interactive-tool/retinoscopy-simulator.
   Google Scholar
• Borgersen NJ, Skou Thomsen AS, Konge L, et al. Virtual reality‐based proficiency test in direct ophthalmoscopy. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96: e259–e261. doi:10.1111/aos.13546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AS, O’Connor J, Taylor L, et al. A 3D virtual reality ophthalmoscopy trainer. Clin Teach 2017; 14: 427–431. doi:10.1111/tct.12646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse S, Taylor D, Armitage JA. Is this mine to keep? Three-dimensional printing enables active, personalized learning in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2019; 12: 518–528. doi:10.1002/ase.1840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, et al. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: a review. SUSOC 2022; 3: 275–285. doi:10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries P. Simulation in nursing education: from conceptualization to evaluation. 3rd ed. Washington: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Logeswaran A, Munsch C, Chong YJ, et al. The role of extended reality technology in healthcare education: towards a learner-centred approach. Future Healthc J 2021; 8: e79–e84. doi:10.7861/fhj.2020-0112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross BH. The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. 51st ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Clark RE. Media will never influence learning. ETR&D 1994; 42: 21–29. doi:10.1007/BF02299088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. Where are we with web-based learning in medical education? Med Teach 2006; 28: 594–598. doi:10.1080/01421590601028854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert LB, Socolan O, Sader R, et al. Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19: 454. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy L, Pettit RK, Lewis JH, et al. Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16: 20. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0530-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopina N. A staged defragmented simultaneous debriefing model as integrated micro-debriefing components inside online simulation for competencies formation. Cureus 2024; 16. doi:10.7759/cureus.56000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez L, Kardong-Edgren S. Deliberate practice for mastery learning in nursing. Clin Simul Nurs 2017; 13: 10–14. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So HY, Chen PP, Wong GKC, et al. Simulation in medical education. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2019; 49: 52–57. doi:10.4997/JRCPE.2019.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly MA, Berragan E, Husebø SE, et al. Simulation in nursing education—international perspectives and contemporary scope of practice. J Nurs Scholarsh 2016; 48: 312–321. doi:10.1111/jnu.12208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar