Evaluating perceived technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance in optometry students

References

• Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S et al. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J E Health 2007; 13: 573–590. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Australia. Telehealth clinical practice guide. May 2021. https://www.optometry.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Professional_support/Guidelines/OPT003_Telehealth-Clinical-Practice-Guide_210520.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Day R, Smith C, Muir J et al. Optometric use of a teleophthalmology service in rural Western Australia: comparison of two prospective audits. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 163–167. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartnik SE, Copeland SP, Aicken AJ et al. Optometry-facilitated teleophthalmology: an audit of the first year in Western Australia. Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101: 700–703. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie J, Block SS, Morjaria P. The role of optometry in the delivery of eye care via telehealth: a systematic literature review. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28: 1753–1763. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitari C, Ologeanu-Taddei R. The intention to use an electronic health record and its antecedents among three different categories of clinical staff. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18: 194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3022-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon TW, Lending D. Will they adopt? Effects of privacy and accuracy. J Comput Inf Syst 2010; 50: 20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs RJ, Caballero J, Parmar J et al. The role of self-efficacy, flexibility, and gender in pharmacy students’ health information technology readiness. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2019; 11: 1103–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.07.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs NJ 1986; 1986: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MA, Coffman M, Jetty A et al. Family physicians report considerable interest in, but limited use of, telehealth services. J Am Board Fam Med 2017; 30: 320–330. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edirippulige S, Armfield NR. Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: a review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare 2017; 23: 273–282. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16632968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chike-Harris KE, Durham C, Logan A et al. Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: a review. Telemed J E Health 2021; 27: 137–149. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entry-level competency standards for optometry 2022. Optometry Australia; 2022. https://www.optometry.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Professional_support/Guidelines/Final_Entry-level-Competency-Standard-for-Optometry-2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bulik RJ, Shokar GS. Integrating telemedicine instruction into the curriculum: expanding student perspectives of the scope of clinical practice. J Telemed Telecare 2010; 16: 355–358. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.090910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockes C, Grischott T, Dutkiewicz M et al. Evaluation of the education “clinical telemedicine/e-health” in the curriculum of medical students at the university of zurich. Telemed E-Health 2017; 23: 899–904. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson CE, Fauchald S, Ideker M. Integrating telehealth into the graduate nursing curriculum. J Nurse Practitioners 2015; 11: e1–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.06.019.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge CM, Haney T, Bordelon M et al. Telehealth: preparing advanced practice nurses to address healthcare needs in rural and underserved populations. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2014; 11: 1–9. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0061.
   Google Scholar
• C R, K G. Validating the technology proficiency self-assessment questionnaire for 21st Century learning (TPSA C-21). J Digit Learn Teach Educ 2017; 33: 20–31. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: an acceptance model and survey. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18: e49. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade V, Soar J, Gray L. Uptake of telehealth services funded by medicare in Australia. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38: 528–532. doi: 10.1071/AH14090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner A, Copeland S, Aicken A Optometry-facilitated videoconference uptake in Western Australia following introduction of new MBS item numbers. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY; 2016: WILEY-BLACKWELL 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cham K, Edwards ML, Kruesi L et al. Digital preferences and perceptions of students in health professional courses at a leading Australian university: a baseline for improving digital skills and competencies in health graduates. Australas J Educ Technol 2022; 38: 69–86. doi: 10.14742/ajet.6622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perifanou M, Tzafilkou K, Economides AA. The role of Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube frequency of use in university students’ digital skills components. Educ Sci 2021; 11: 766. doi: 10.3390/educsci11120766.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy C. Perceived self-efficacy and technology proficiency in undergraduate college students. Comput Educ 2010; 55: 1614–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton LJ, Summers J, Lawrence J et al. Digital literacy in higher education: the rhetoric and the reality. In: Harmes M, Huijser H Danaher P, editors. Myths in education, learning and teaching: policies, practices and principles. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2015. p. 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan CA, Craig A, Coldwell-Neilson J. Students’ computing use and study: when more is less. Australas J Inf Syst 2016; 20. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v20i0.990.
   Google Scholar
• Gibadullin A. Assessing digital skills in tertiary students. In 2021 International Scientific and Practical Conference “‘Information Technologies and Intelligent Decision Making Systems’”, Russian Federation, Moscow: ITIDMS 2021; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Warshawski S, Itzhaki M, Barnoy S. Nurse and nurse student attitudes and perceived self-efficacy in use of information and communication technologies: professional and cultural differences. Comput Inf Nurs 2019; 37: 20–28. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Mandrusiak A, Lang R et al. A telehealth curriculum: a pre-post study of physiotherapy students’ perceived knowledge, self-efficacy and intentions for future use. Focus Health Prof Educ 2022; 23: 56–72. doi: 10.11157/fohpe.v23i3.595.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Q 2003; 27: 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Mis Q 2012; 36: 157–178. doi: 10.2307/41410412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garavand A, Aslani N, Nadri H et al. Acceptance of telemedicine technology among physicians: a systematic review. Inf Med Unlocked 2022; 30: 100943. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.100943.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Liu L. The role of internet self-efficacy in the acceptance of web-based electronic medical records. J Organ End User Comput 2005; 17: 38–57. doi: 10.4018/joeuc.2005010103.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Ko M, Warren J et al. Healthcare technology self-efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: an empirical study. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 58: 12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon SR, Evans JS, Benjamin A et al. Patients’ attitudes toward electronic health information exchange: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11: e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 595–621. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE guide No. 82. Med Teach 2013; 35: e1511–e1530. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovel RG, Gabarin N, Cavalcanti RB et al. Curricular needs for training telemedicine physicians: a scoping review. Med Teach 2020; 42: 1234–1242. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1799959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24: 4–12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar