Business mating: when start-ups get it right

References

• Abernathy, W. J. 1978. The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abernathy, W. J., and J. M. Utterback. 1978. “Patterns of Industrial Innovation.” Technology Review 80 (7): 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. 2000. “The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages.” Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., and C. M. Lampert. 2001. “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7): 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., F. Polidoro, and W. Mitchell. 2009. “Structural Homophily or Social Asymmetry? The Formation of Alliances by Poorly Embedded Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 30 (9): 941–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M. B., D. Avery, F. Narin, and P. McAllister. 1991. “Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents.” Research Policy 20 (3): 251–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersén, J. 2010. “A Critical Examination of the EO-Performance Relationship.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 16 (4): 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P., and M. L. Tushman. 1990. “Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (4): 604–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” The Economic Journal 99 (394): 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avlonitis, G. J., and H. E. Salavou. 2007. “Entrepreneurial Orientation of SMEs, Product Innovativeness, and Performance.” Journal of Business Research 60 (5): 566–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarNir, A., and K. A. Smith. 2002. “Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business: The Role of Social Networks.” Journal of Small Business Management 40 (3): 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresser, R. K., and R. C. Bishop. 1983. “Dysfunctional Effects of Formal Planning: Two Theoretical Explanations.” Academy of Management Review 8 (4): 588–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. 2002. Interpreting Quantitative Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chandy, R. K., and G. J. Tellis. 1998. “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize.” Journal of Marketing Research 35 (4): 474–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., and D. P. Slevin. 1989. “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments.” Strategic Management Journal 10 (1): 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., and W. J. Wales. 2011. “The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation.” EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice 36 (4): 677–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, D. 2011. “Predicting Stakeholder Orientation in the Multinational Enterprise: A Mid-Range Theory.” Journal of International Business Studies 42 (5): 694–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2011. “Rotating Leadership and Collaborative Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 56 (2): 159–201. doi:10.1177/0001839211428131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, R. D., and J. E. Dutton. 1986. “The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis.” Management Science 32 (11): 1422–1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, D. H., and W. H. Glick. 1994. “Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling.” Academy of Management Review 19 (2): 230–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., and A. H. Van de Ven. 1985. “Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (4): 514–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J. E., W. P. Bridges, and R. D. O’keefe. 1984. “Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation.” Management Science 30 (6): 682–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. 2007. “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations.” Academy of ManagementReview 32 (4): 1180–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. 2011. “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research.” Academy of Management Journal 54 (2): 393–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, J. S., and S. Stern. 2003. “The Product Market and the Market for “Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs.” Research Policy 32 (2): 333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., and R. Calantone. 2002. “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 (2): 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatignon, H., M. L. Tushman, W. Smith, and P. Anderson. 2002. “A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics.” ManagementScience 48 (9): 1103–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B. A., and L. Marino. 2011. “The Epistemology of Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptual Formation, Modeling, and Operationalization.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (5): 989–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T. 2011. “Cross-Cultural Differences in Compensation Level and Inequality Across Occupations: A Set-Theoretic Analysis.” Organization Studies 32 (1): 85–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., V. F. Misangyi, H. Elms, and R. Lacey. 2008. “Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Strategic Management Research: An Examination of Combinations of Industry, Corporate, and Business-Unit Effects.” Organizational Research Methods 11 (4): 695–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallen, B. L., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2012. “Catalyzing Strategies and Efficient Tie Formation: How Entrepreneurial Firms Obtain Investment Ties.” Academy of Management Journal 55 (1): 35–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. L. 1992. “An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes.” Academy of Management Review 17 (2): 327–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. M., and K. B. Clark. 1990. “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, G. E., C. M. Hultman, S. Kraus, and R. Schulte. 2010. “History, Theory and Evidence of Entrepreneurial Marketing – An Overview.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 11 (1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P., and D. J. Power. 1985. “Retrospective Reports of Strategic-Level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing Their Accuracy.” Strategic Management Journal 6 (2): 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D., and R. M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.” Journalof Marketing 59 (2): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. A., and P. C. Argouslidis. 2005. “Shaping Business Decisions Using Fuzzy-Set Analysis: Service Elimination Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Management 21 (5–6): 641–658.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. 1997. “Industry Life Cycles.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1): 145–182.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, S. J., and S. E. Margolis. 1995. “Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11 (1): 205–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. Dess. 1996. “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance.” Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 135–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. Dess. 2001. “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle.” Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5): 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and Z. Shapira. 1987. “Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking.” Management Science 33 (11): 1404–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlin, D., D. J. Ketchen Jr, and B. Lamont. 2007. “Equifinality and the Strategic Groups – Performance Relationship.” Journal of Managerial Issues 19 (2): 208–232.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, A. 2006. Towards More Robust Model Specification in QCA: Results from a Methodological Experiment. Philadelphia, PA: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1983. “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms.” Management Science 29 (7): 770–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1987. “The Genesis of Configuration.” Academy of Management Review 12 (4): 686–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1988. “Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (2): 280–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1990. “Organizational Configurations: Cohesion, Change, and Prediction.” Human Relations 43 (8): 771–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1996. “Configurations Revisited.” Strategic Management Journal, 17 (7): 505–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2011. “Miller (1983) Revisited: A Reflection on EO Research and Some Suggestions for the Future.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (5): 873–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., M. F. R. Kets de Vries, and J.-M. Toulouse. 1982. “Top Executive Locus of Control and Its Relationship to Strategy-Making, Structure, and Environment.” Academy of Management Journal 25 (2): 237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. J. 2001. Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. J., and R. Spekman. 1994. “Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques.” Strategic Management Journal 15 (2): 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmann, J. P., and K. Frenken. 2006. “Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change.” Research Policy 35 (7): 925–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkongolo-Bakenda, J.-M. 2001. “Inter-Firm Networking Propensity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs).” The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures 1 (1): 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ordanini, A., and P. P. Maglio. 2009. “Market Orientation, Internal Process, and External Network: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Key Decisional Alternatives in the New Service Development.” Decision Sciences 40 (3): 601–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2005. From Fuzzy Sets to Crips Truth Tables, 1–25. Tucson: University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2006. “Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 291–310. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2009. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA).” In Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin, 87–121. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin. 2009. “Introduction.” In Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Compartive Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin, xvii–xxv. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, B. 2007. “Multi-Channel Strategy in Business-to-Business Markets: Prospects and Problems.” Industrial Marketing Management 36 (1): 4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., and M. L. Tushman. 1998. “The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology: Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change 7 (2): 311–346.
   Google Scholar
• Rotemberg, J. J., and G. Saloner. 1993. “Leadership Style and Incentives.” Management Science 39 (11): 1299–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, W., and G. Duysters. 2010. “The Technological Origins of Radical Inventions.” Research Policy 39 (8): 1051–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. C., G. T. Payne, and D. J. Ketchen. 2008. “Research on Organizational Configurations: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges.” Journal of Management 34 (6): 1053–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souder, W. E., and X. M. Song. 1997. “Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (1): 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souder, W. E., and X. M. Song. 1998. “Analyses of US and Japanese Management Processes Associated with New Product Success and Failure in High and Low Familiarity Markets.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 15 (3): 208–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, L. W., A. I. El-Ansary, and J. R. Brown. 1989. Management in Marketing Channels. International Editions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. “Social Structure and Organizations.” In Handbook of Organizations, edited by J. G. March, 142–193. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Street, C. T., and A.-F. Cameron. 2007. “External Relationships and the Small Business: A Review of Small Business Alliance and Network Research.” Journal of Small Business Management 45 (2): 239–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 1986. “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy.” Research Policy 15 (6): 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2010. “Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation.” Long Range Planning 43(2–3): 172–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M. 1971. “The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm.” Academy of Management Journal 14 (1): 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. 1989. “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence.” Academy of Management Review 14 (3): 423–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J., and D. Shepherd. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach.” Journal of Business Venturing 20 (1): 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I., L. Young, and P. V. Freytag. 2005. “Business Mating: Who Chooses and Who Gets Chosen?” Industrial Marketing Management 34 (7): 669–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., C. K. Yim, and D. K. Tse. 2005. “The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations.” Journal of Marketing 69 (2): 42–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar