Realization as a Device for Remedying Problems of Affiliation in Interaction

REFERENCES

• Asmuβ , B. and Kjærbeck , S. 2005 . Negotiating meaning in narratives: An investigation of the interactional construction of the punch line and the post punch line sequence . Narrative Inquiry , 15 ( 1 ) : 1 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. , eds. 1984 . Structures of social action , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Betz , E. and Golato , A. 2008 . Remembering relevant information and withholding relevant next actions: The German token “achja.” . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 41 : 58 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman , S. E. 2002 . “ Sequence and solidarity ” . In Advances in group processes: Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity , Edited by: Lawler , E. J. and Thye , S. R. Vol. 19 , 229 – 253 . Greenwich, CT : JAI .
   Google Scholar
• Drew , P. and Curl , T. 2009 . Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation . Journal of Pragmatics , 41 ( 12 ) : 2400 – 2414 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner , R. 2001 . When listeners talk , Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Goffman , E. 1981 . Response cries . Language , 54 : 787 – 815 .
   Google Scholar
• Golato , A. and Fagyal , Z. 2008 . Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: A conversation analytic perspective . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 41 : 241 – 270 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Vänttinen , M. 2001 . Lyssnaren i fokus. En samtalsanalytisk studie i uppbackningar [The listener in focus. A conversation analytic study of feed-back] , Helsingfors, , Finland : Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland .
   Google Scholar
• Heath , C. 1989 . Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation . Social Psychology Quarterly , 52 : 113 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. 2008 . Questions of accountability: Yes–no interrogatives that are unanswerable . Discourse Studies , 2008 ( 10 ) : 55 – 71 .
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. 2009a . Participation and exclusion in third party complaints . Journal of Pragmatics , 41 : 2435 – 2451 .
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. 2009b . “ Two types of answers to inapposite inquiry ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 159 – 186 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 1984a . Garfinkel and ethnomethodology , Cambridge, New York, NY, , England : Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 1984b . “ A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 299 – 345 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2002 . The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content . Journal of Pragmatics , 34 ( 10–11 ) : 1427 – 1446 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2005 . “ Cognition in discourse ” . In Conversation and cognition , Edited by: Molder , H. T. and Potter , J. 184 – 202 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1979 . “ A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination ” . In Everydaylanguage: Studies in ethnomethodology , Edited by: Psathas , G. 79 – 96 . New York, NY : Irvington .
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum , J. 1991/1992 . “ Conversational non-cooperation: An exploration of disattended complaints97–138 ” . In Research on Language and Social Interaction Vol. 25 ,
   Google Scholar
• Maynard , D. W. 2003 . Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings , Chicago, IL, London, , England : The University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland , H. and Huiskes , M. 2001 . “ Dutch “but” as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker ” . In Studies in interactional linguistics , Edited by: Selting , M. and Couper-Kuhlen , E. 141 – 170 . Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Monzoni , C. M. 2008 . Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of “pre-sequences.” . Discourse Studies , 10 : 73 – 87 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen , M. F. 2002 . “ Nå! En skiftemarkør med mange funktioner [Oh! A change-of-state token with many functions] ” . In Studier i Nordisk 2000–2001 , 51 – 67 . Copenhagen, , Denmark : Selskab for Nordisk Filologi .
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984a . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 57 – 101 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984b . “ Pursuing a response ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 152 – 164 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 2007 . Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schubiger , M. 1972 . “ English intonation and German modal particles: A comparative study ” . In Intonation , Edited by: Bolinger , D. 175 – 193 . Harmondsworth, , England : Penguin .
   Google Scholar
• Steensig , J. and Asmuβ , B. 2005 . “ Notes on disaligning “yes but” initiated utterances in German and Danish conversations: Two construction types for dispreferred responses ” . In Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction , Edited by: Hakulinen , A. and Selting , M. 349 – 374 . Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. 2004 . “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction . Human Communication Research , 30 : 250 – 293 .
   Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. 2008 . Stance, alignment and affiliation during story telling: When nodding is a token of preliminary affiliation . Research on Language in Social Interaction , 41 : 31 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig , J. 2008 . Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair . Journal of Pragmatics , 40 : 333 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen , J. and Zimmerman , D. H. 1998 . Observations on the display and management of emotions in naturally occurring activities: The case of “hysteria” in calls to 9-1-1 . Social Psychology Quarterly , 61 : 141 – 159 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson , S. and Kitzinger , C. 2006 . Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation . Social Psychology Quarterly , 69 : 150 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu , R.-J. R. 2004 . Stance in talk: A conversation analysis of Mandarin final particles , Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar