Hypothetical Questions: A Comparative Analysis and Implications for “Applied” vs. “Basic” Conversation Analysis

REFERENCES

• Adler , R. B. and Rodman , G. 2003 . Understanding human communication (8th ed.) , Oxford , , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Antaki , C. , ed. 2011 . Applied conversation analysis: Changing institutional practices , Basingstoke , , England : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Arminen , I. 2009 . “ On comparative methodology in studies of social interaction ” . In Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions , Edited by: Haakana , M. , Laakso , M. and Lindström , J. 48 – 69 . Helsinki , , Finland : Finnish Literature Society .
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiadou , A. and Dirven , R. 1997 . “ Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality ” . In On conditionals again , Edited by: Athanasiadou , A. and Dirven , R. 61 – 96 . Amsterdam , , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Clayman , S. and Heritage , J. 2002 . The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air , New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Drew , P. 2003 . “ Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch ” . In Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper , Edited by: Glenn , P. , LeBaron , C. D. and Mandelbaum , J. 293 – 308 . Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Drew , P. and Heritage , J. 1992 . “ Analyzing talk at work: An introduction ” . In Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings , Edited by: Drew , P. and Heritage , J. 3 – 65 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson , C. A. , Reilly , J. S. , Ter Meulen , A. and Traugott , E. C. 1986 . “ Overview ” . In On conditionals , Edited by: Traugott , E. C. , Ter Meulen , A. , Reilly , J. S. and Ferguson , C. A. 3 – 20 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Frankel , R. 1990 . “ Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters ” . In Interactional competence , Edited by: Psathas , G. 231 – 62 . Washington , DC : University Press of America .
   Google Scholar
• Freed , A. and Ehrlich , S. 2010 . Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse , 133 – 158 . Oxford , , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2002 . The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content . Journal of Pragmatics , 34 : 1427 – 1446 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2005 . “ Conversation analysis and institutional talk ” . In Handbook of language and social interaction , Edited by: Fitch , K. L. and Sanders , R. E. 103 – 146 . Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2010 . “ Questioning in medicine ” . In “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse , Edited by: Freed , A. and Ehrlich , S. 42 – 68 . New York , NY : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. and Clayman , S. 2010 . Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions , Chichester, England : Wiley Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Kondratyuk , N. and Peräkylä , A. 2011 . Therapeutic work with the present moment: A comparative conversation analysis of existential and cognitive therapies . Psychotherapy Research , 21 : 316 – 330 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner , G. H. 1991 . On the syntax of sentences in progress . Language in Society , 20 : 441 – 458 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard , D. W. 1991 . “ The perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news ” . In Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis , Edited by: Boden , D. and Zimmerman , D. H. 162 – 192 . Cambridge , , England : Polity Press .
   Google Scholar
• Maynard , D. W. 1992 . “ On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news ” . In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings , Edited by: Drew , P. and Heritage , J. 331 – 358 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Maynard , D. W. , Houtkoop-Steenstra , H. , Schaeffer , N. C. and Van der Zouwen , J. 2002 . Standardization and tacit knowledge. Interaction and practice in the survey interview , New York , NY : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf , M. , Van Nijnatten , C. and Elbers , E. 2008a . Assessing suitability for adoptive parenthood: Hypothetical questions as part of ongoing conversation . Discourse Studies , 10 : 655 – 672 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf , M. , Van Nijnatten , C. and Elbers , E. 2008b . Future talk: Discussing hypothetical situations with prospective adoptive parents . Qualitative Social Work , 7 : 310 – 329 .
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä , A. 1993 . Invoking a hostile world: Discussing the patient's future in AIDS counselling . Text , 13 : 291 – 316 .
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä , A. 1995 . AIDS counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice , Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä , A. , Ruusuvuori , J. and Lindfors , P. 2007 . “ What is patient participation: Reflections arising from the study of general practice, homoeopathy and psychoanalysis ” . In Patient participation in health care consultations: Qualitative perspectives , Edited by: Collins , S. , Britten , N. , Ruusuvuori , J. and Thompson , A. 121 – 142 . Maidenhead, England : Open University Press . In(Eds.)
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984 . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 79 – 112 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Puchta , C. and Potter , J. 2004 . Focus group practice , London, England : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori , J. 2005 . “Empathy” and “sympathy” in action: Attending to patients' troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations . Social Psychology Quarterly , 68 : 204 – 222 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori , J. 2007 . Managing affect: Integration of empathy and problem solving in health care encounters . Discourse Studies , 9 : 597 – 622 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 1992 . “ On talk and its institutional occasions ” . In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings , Edited by: Drew , P. and Heritage , J. 101 – 134 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 1999 . Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis . Discourse Studies , 1 : 405 – 435 .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 2007 . Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis , Vol. 1 , Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 2009 . “ One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 357 – 406 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shea , S. C. 1998 . Psychiatric interviewing: The art of understanding: A practical guide for psychiatrists, counselors, social workers, nurses, and other mental health professionals , 2nd , Philadelphia , PA : Saunders .
   Google Scholar
• Speer , S. A. 2010 . “ Pursuing views and testing commitments: The role of “worst case” hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients ” . In Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse , Edited by: Freed , A. and Ehrlich , S. 133 – 158 . Oxford , , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Speer , S. A. and Parsons , C. 2006 . Gatekeeping gender: Some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients . Discourse & Society , 17 : 785 – 812 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe , E. 2012 . Social psychology, social interaction and application: Creating empirical, knowledge exchange and enterprise “impacts” in qualitative work , Manuscript submitted for publication .
   Google Scholar
• Wooffitt , R. and Widdicombe , S. 2006 . “ Interaction in interviews ” . In Talk and interaction in social research methods , Edited by: Drew , P. , Raymond , G. and Weinberg , D. 28 – 49 . London , , England : Sage .
   Google Scholar