Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints

REFERENCES

• Adelswärd , V. 1989 . Laughter and dialogue: The social significance of laughter in institutional discourse . Nordic Journal of Linguistics , 12 : 107 – 136 .
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 1984 . Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Clayman , S. E. 2002 . Sequence and solidarity . Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity , 19 : 229 – 253 .
   Google Scholar
• Drew , P. 1987 . Po-faced receipts of teases . Linguistics , 25 : 219 – 253 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew , P. 1998 . Complaints about transgressions and misconduct . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 31 ( 3–4 ) : 295 – 325 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew , P. and Walker , T. 2009 . Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation . Journal of Pragmatics , 41 : 2400 – 2414 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards , D. 2005 . Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints . Discourse Studies , 7 : 5 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmersten , S. and Heinemann , T. 2010 . Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 43 ( 2 ) : 109 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn , P. 2003 . Laughter in interaction , Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Glenn , P. 2010 . Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 1485 – 1498 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haakana , M. 1999 . Laughing matters: A conversation analytical study of laughter in doctor–patient interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) , Department of Finnish Language, University of Helsinki .
   Google Scholar
• Haakana , M. 2002 . Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back . Journal of Sociolinguistics , 6 : 207 – 235 .
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. 2009 . Managing unavoidable conflicts in caretaking of the elderly: Humor as a mitigating resource . International Journal for the Sociology of Language , 200 : 103 – 127 .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. and Raymond , G. 2005 . The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction . Social Psychology Quarterly , 68 : 15 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt , E. 1993 . The structure of death announcements: Looking on the bright side of death . Text , 13 : 189 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Holt , E. 2010 . The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 1513 – 1525 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt , E. in press . “There's many a true word said in jest”: Seriousness and non-seriousness in interaction ” . In Studies of laughter in interaction , Edited by: Glenn , P. and Holt , E. London , UK : Continuum .
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1980 . On “troubles-premonitory” response to inquiry . Sociological Inquiry , 50 : 153 – 185 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1984a . “ On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 191 – 222 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1984b . “ On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 346 – 369 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1993 . Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 ( 1 ) : 1 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. , Sacks , H. and Schegloff , E. 1987 . “ Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy ” . In Talk and social organisation , Edited by: Button , G. and Lee , J. R. E. 152 – 205 . Clevedon , , England : Multilingual Matters .
   Google Scholar
• Markaki , V. , Merlino , S. , Mondada , L. and Oloff , F. 2010 . Laughter in professional meetings: The organization of an emergent ethnic joke . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 1526 – 1542 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell-Trujillo , N. and Adams , K. 1983 . Heheh in conversation: Some coordinating accomplishments of laughter . The Western Journal of Speech Communication , 47 : 175 – 191 .
   Google Scholar
• Osvaldsson , K. 2004 . On laughter and disagreement in multiparty assessment talk . Text , 24 : 517 – 545 .
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984 . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 57 – 101 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sacks , H. 1992 . Lectures on conversation , Edited by: Jefferson , G. Vol. 1 , Oxford , , England : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. and Sacks , H. 1973 . Opening up closings . Semiotica , 8 : 289 – 327 .
   Google Scholar
• Schenkein , J. N. 1972 . Towards an analysis of natural conversation and the sense of . Hehe. Semiotica , 6 : 344 – 377 .
   Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. 2004 . “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction . Human Communication Research , 30 : 260 – 293 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. 2008 . Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 41 ( 1 ) : 31 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vöge , M. 2010 . Local identity processes in business meetings displayed through laughter in complaint sequence . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 1556 – 1576 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson , S. and Kitzinger , C. 2006 . Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation . Social Psychology Quarterly , 69 : 150 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar