“I Can See Some Sadness in Your Eyes”: When Experiential Therapists Notice a Client’s Affectual Display

REFERENCES

• Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Talk at work ( pp. 137–163). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boritz, T. Z., Angus, L., Monette, G., & Hollis-Walker, L. (2008). An empirical analysis of autobiographical memory specificity subtypes in brief emotion-focused and client-centered treatments of depression. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 584–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (2003). Unmasking the face. Cambridge, MA: Malor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. N., Greenberg, L. S., & Angus, L. (2006). The effects of adding emotion-focused interventions to the client-centered relationship conditions in the treatment of depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 536–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen ( Eds.), Emotion in interaction ( pp. 16–41). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S. (1989). A demonstration with Dr. Leslie Greenberg/Integrative psychotherapy—A six-part series, Part 5. Corona Del Mar, CA: Psychological & Education Films.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through feelings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S. (2010). Emotion-focused therapy: A clinical synthesis. Focus, 8, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2007). Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 89–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig ( Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation ( pp. 159–183). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner ( Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation ( pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kondratyuk, N., & Peräkylä, A. (2011). Therapeutic work with the present moment: A comparative conversation analysis of existential and cognitive therapies. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 316–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London, England: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P. (2004). Narrative counselling: Social and linguistic processes of change. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., & Hadic Zabala, L. (2008). Expandable responses: How clients get prompted to say more during psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 187–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perls, F. (1973). The Gestalt approach & eye witness to therapy. Ben Lomond, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
   Google Scholar
• Perls, F., Hefferline, R., & Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt therapy. London, England: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis ( pp. 79–112). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2, G. Jefferson, ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton ( Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order ( pp. 89–135). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shostrum, E. L. (Producer). (1966). Three approaches to psychotherapy [Motion picture]. Santa Ana, CA: Psychological Films.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S. (2008). Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar ( Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy ( pp. 120–138). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010). Recognition and interpretation: Responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. C., Greenberg, L. S., & Lieater, G. (1998). The experiential paradigm unfolding: Relationship and experiencing in therapy. In L. S. Greenberg, J. C. Watson, & G. Lietaer ( Eds.), Handbook of experiential psychotherapy ( pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, C. (1992). Symbolic experiential family therapy: Model and methodology. In J. K. Zeig ( Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy ( pp. 13–23). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar