Sighing in Interaction: Somatic, Semiotic, and Social

REFERENCES

• Bailey, J. (2008). Could patients’ coughing have communicative significance? Communication & Medicine, 5(2), 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). Response tokens in interaction—Prosody, phonetics and a visual aspect of German JAJA. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12, 301–370.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(4), 325–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, I. (2012). Do “continuing states of incipient talk” exist? In Inaction and silent action in interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Roehampton, Roehampton, England.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherniack, N. S., Euler, C., Glowgowska, M., & Homma, I. (1981). Characteristics and rate of occurrence of spontaneous and provoked augmented breaths. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111, 349–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Analyzing language in interaction: The practice of “never mind. ” English Language and Linguistics, 8(2), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection. Text & Talk, 32, 453–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Curl, T. (2009). “Going too far”: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2400–2414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S. A., Englebretson, R., & Martey, N. (2000–2005). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W., Scheutze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D., & Cumming, S. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert ( Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research ( pp. 45–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7(1), 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1977). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1(2), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Fox, B. A. (2010). Multiple practices for constructing laughables. In D. Barth Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting ( Eds.), Prosody in interaction ( pp. 339–368). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2013). Units and/or action trajectories? The language of grammatical categories and the language of social action. In B. Szczepek Reed & G. Raymond ( Eds.), Units of talk—Units of action ( pp. 13–56). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, P. J. (2003). Laughter in interaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, P. J., & Holt, E. (2013). Studies of laughter in interaction. London, England: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54, 787–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. A. (1975). A system for the transfer of instructions in natural settings. Semiotica, 14(3), 269–295.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen ( Eds.), Emotion in interaction ( pp. 16–41). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In N. Budwig, I. C. Uzgris, & J. V. Wertsch ( Eds.), Communication: An arena of development ( pp. 33–53). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A. (2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription, and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 251–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2007). Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(1), 89–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state-token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis ( pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirose, S. (2000). Restlessness or respiration as a manifestation of akathisia: Five case reports of respiratory akathisia. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61, 737–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. (in press). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow ( Ed.), Studies in social interaction ( pp. 294–338). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1974, November). Notes on the sequential organization of laughter in conversation: Onset sensitivity in invitations to laugh. Paper presented at the 73rd Annual American Anthropological Association Convention, Mexico City.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein ( Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction ( pp. 219–248). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas ( Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology ( pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Structure of social action ( pp. 347–369). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1985a). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. A. van Dijk ( Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. III, pp. 25–34). London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1985b). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “yeah” and “mm hm.” Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner ( Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation ( pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2010). Sometimes a frog in your throat is just a frog in your throat: Gutturals as (sometimes) laughter-implicative. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1476–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee ( Eds.), Talk and social organisation ( pp. 152–205). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Turn-opening smiles: Facial expression constructing emotional transition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson ( Eds.), Interaction and grammar ( pp. 238–276). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., & Linton, L. (2004). Before beginning: Breath taking in conversation (Unpublished manuscript). University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings ( pp. 66–100). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers ( Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis ( pp. 103–130). Chichester, England: Wiley- Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, J. (2013). Storytelling in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers ( Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis ( pp. 492–508). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H. (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1816–1869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R., Hakulinen, A., & Tainio, L. (2004). Indexing ”no news” with stylization in Finnish. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford ( Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation ( pp. 299–334). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2012). Facial expression and interactional regulation of emotion. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen ( Eds.), Emotion in interaction ( pp. 64–91). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perakyla, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. ( Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage ( Eds.), Structure of social action ( pp. 57–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2010). Interjektionen zwischen Lexikon und Vokalität: Lexem oder Lauobject? [Interjections between lexicon and vocalization: Lexeme or sound object?]. In A. Deppermann & A. Linke ( Eds.), Sprache intermedial. Stimme und Schrift, Bild und Ton [Intermedial speech: Voice and writing, image and sound] ( pp. 69–96). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers ( Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis ( pp. 308–329). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J. (2005). “Empathy” and “sympathy” in action: Attending to patients’ troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(3), 204–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers ( Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis ( pp. 330–349). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A. (2009). Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One interaction of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson ( Eds.), Grammar and interaction ( pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2001). Getting serious: Joke → serious “no. ” Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1945–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On complainability. Social Problems, 52(3), 449–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2011). Word repeats as unit ends. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 367–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Lerner, G. H. (2009). Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 91–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. ( Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L., & Peräkylä, A. ( Eds.). (2012a). Emotion in interaction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L., & Peräkylä, A. (2012b). Introduction. In M.-L. Sorjonen & A. Peräkylä ( Eds.), Emotion in interaction ( pp. 3–15). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2012). Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions: On the prosody of approval in Finnish workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 843–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2013). Managing participation in interaction: The case of humming. Text & Talk, 33(1), 113–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010a). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010b). A scalar view of response relevance. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2007). Prosodic orientation in English conversation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, M. H. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teigen, K. H. (2008). Is a sigh “just a sigh”? Sighs as emotional signals and responses to a difficult task. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., & Vöge, M. ( Eds.). (2010). Laughter in interaction [Special issue]. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1469–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mms and the embodiments of pleasure. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 311–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2012). The social life of “eugh”: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 489–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winslow, L. (Producer). (2013). Will Yahoo! ban on employee telecommuting from home ensure innovation? [Television series episode]. In PBS Newshour. Washington, DC: Public Broadcasting Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2007). Clicks as markers of new sequences in English conversation. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry ( Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress in Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrucken, Germany ( pp. 1069–1072). Saarland, Germany: Central Library of Saarland University.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts, R., Vlemincx, E., Bogaerts, K., Van Diest, I., & Van den Bergh, O. (2011). Sigh rate and respiratory variability during normal breathing and the role of negative affectivity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82, 175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar