Initiating Repair With and Without Particles: Alternative Formats of Other-Initiation of Repair in Korean Conversation

REFERENCES

• Antaki, C. (2012). Affiliative and disaffiliative understanding checks. Discourse Studies, 14, 531–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, T., & Walker, T. (2013). Managing problems of acceptability through high rise-fall repetitions. Discourse Processes, 50, 107–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator “bitte?” Language in Society, 25, 587–612.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, M. (1997). Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multiperson conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 611–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, M. (2004). Other-initiated repair and membership categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1467–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, M., Golato, A., & Robinson, J. D. (2009). Repairing reference. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 104–132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., Dingemanse, M., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Brown, P., Dirksmeyer, T., … Torreira, F. (2013). Huh? What?—A first survey in twenty-one languages. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 343–380). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., & Hayano, K. (2013). Proffering insertable elements: A study of other-initiated repair in Japanese. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 293–321). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., & Kim, H. R. S. (in press). Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources: Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations. Journal of Pragmatics.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–233). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (1993). Other-initiated repairs in Korean as interactional resources. In S. Choi (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 3 (pp. 3–18). Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (1999). Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Tamhwa wa inji [Discourse and Cognition], 6(6), 141–168.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2001). Confirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaboration: Organization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 345–372). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S. (2005). Evidentiality in achieving entitlement, objectivity, and detachment in Korean conversation. Discourse Studies, 7(1), 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5, 51–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S. (1999). A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal –ci in Korean: A synthetic approach to the form-meaning relation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 243–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, S. Y. (2007). Overt reference to speaker and recipient in Korean. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 462–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, T., Thompson, S. A., & Suzuki, R. (2000). The pragmatic nature of the so-called subject marker ga in Japanese: Evidence from conversation. Discourse Studies, 2(1), 55–84.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 73, 137–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2013). Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 261–292). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D., & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2010). Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(3), 232–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 12, 262–286.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (1988). The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 293–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair initiation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 231–270). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, H. M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M. (1996). On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 277–327). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steensig, J., & Drew, P. (2008). Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies, 10, 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, R. J. (2006). Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes, 41, 67–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, R. J. (2009). Repetition in the initiation of repair. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 31–59). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. E. (2006). Interrogatives with question words as complaint utterances in Korean conversation. In T. J. Vance & K. Jones (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 14 (pp. 423–434). Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. (1998). Repair in Chinese conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar