Visible Deflation: Embodiment and Emotion in Interaction

REFERENCES

• Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text and Talk, 30, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). A sequential approach to affect: The case of “disappointment.” In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Linström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp. 94–123). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection. Text and Talk, 32, 453–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). “Open”-class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text and Talk, 32, 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, S. (2005). On VA soccer fields, diplomats become foes. Washington Post, July 27.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 28, 233–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2013). Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 122–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 239–257). New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27, 291–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities and institutions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J.-P. De Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2006). “Observability” in the interactions of very young children. Communication Monographs, 73, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., & Raymond, G. (2007). Action pivots. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., Zimmerman, D. H., & Kidwell, M. (2011). Formal structures of practical tasks: A resource for action in the social life of very young children. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 44–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Chichester, England: Wiley: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2008). Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text and Talk, 28, 723–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2012). Epilogue: What does the study of interaction offer to emotion research? In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 274–289). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potegal, M., & Davidson, R. J. (2003). Temper tantrums in young children: 1. Behavioral composition. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 24(3), 140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, J. (2001). Organizing participation framework in interaction: Doing participation framework. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 253–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J. (2007). Managing affect: Integration of empathy and problem-solving in health care encounters. Discourse Studies, 9, 597–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 330–349). Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65, 535–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On integrity in inquiry … of the investigated, not the investigator. Discourse Studies, 7, 455–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (2010). Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics, 20, 229–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Introduction. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 3–15). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J. (2013). If it’s not one thing, it’s your mother. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Tulbert, E., & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 79–92). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Weatherall, A. (2011). Insertion repair: Practices and actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44, 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton, A. J. (2012). Distress in adult-child interaction. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 42–63). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar