Aphasia Sufferers’ Displays of Affect in Conversation

REFERENCES

• Aaltonen, T., & Laakso, M. (2010). Halting aphasic interaction: Creation of intersubjectivity and spousal relationship in situ. Communication & Medicine, 7, 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. (1979). Planning units in spontaneous speech: Some evidence from hesitation in speech and speaker gaze direction in conversation. Linguistics, 17, 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, L. X., Heilman, K. M., Ketterson, T., Rosenbek, J., Raymer, A., Crosson, B., … González Rothi, L. (2005). Affective facial and lexical expression in aprosodic versus aphasic stroke patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 677–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broca, P. (1861). Nouvelle observation d’aphémie produite par une lésion de la moitié postérieure des deuxième et troisième circonvolution frontales gauches [New observations on aphemia produced by a lesion to the posterior half of second and third left frontal gyrus]. Bulletin de la Société Anatomique, 6, 398–407.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2008). Soliciting teacher attention in an L2 classroom: Affect displays, classroom artefacts, and embodied action. Applied Linguistics, 30, 26–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 113–146). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32, 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. (1992). Managing conflicting goals in supportive interaction: An integrative theoretical framework. Communication Research, 19, 264–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H. (1993). Understanding aphasia. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003). Conversation and brain damage. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 239–257). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. E. Ford, B. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56–80). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haakana, M. (1999). Laughing matters: A conversation analytic study of laughter in doctor-patient interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Haakana, M. (2001). Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text, 21, 187–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hakulinen, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2012). Being equivocal: Affective responses left unspecified. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 147–173). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V. B., & Tomhave, J. A. (1991). Smile and (half) the world smiles with you, frown and you frown alone. Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 586–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–369). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2014). Foreshadowing a problem: Turn-opening frowns in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 132–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. (1996). Conversation as an achievement in aphasia. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Klippi, A., Laakso, M., & Tykkyläinen, T. (2005, June). Les affects partagés dans les situations d’ortophonie et de traitement langage/Shared affects in speech and language therapy situations. Paper presented at Interacting Bodies, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation (Studia Fennica Linguistica 8). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation: An interactive view on the extended speaking turns of Wernicke’s aphasics. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2010). Cut-off or particle—Devices for initiating self-repair in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1151–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Milroy, L., & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: Towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6, 27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1989). Introduction. The pragmatics of affect. Text, 9, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society, 14, 727–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A. (2009). Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Sandlund, E. (2004). Feeling by doing: The social organization of everyday emotions in academic talk-in-interaction (Doctoral dissertation). Karlstad University Studies 36, Karlstad, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 12, pp. 261–286). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation. A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2007). Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 542–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar