The Alignment of Manual and Verbal Displays in Requests for the Repair of an Object

REFERENCES

• Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for casual “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325–352. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. (2008). “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker so to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 302–337. doi:10.1080/08351810802237909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., O’Neill, J., & Rooksby, J. (2009). Designing for diagnosing: Introduction to the special issue on diagnostic work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 18, 109–128. doi:10.1007/s10606-009-9092-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. (1999). On the concessive relation in conversational English. In F. W. Neumann & S. Schuelting (Eds.), Anglistentag 1998 Erfurt: Proceedings (pp. 29–39). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 129–153. doi:10.1080/08351810802028613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Eds.). (2014). Requesting in social interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Emmertsen, S., and Heinemann, T. (2010). Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 109–132. doi:10.1080/08351811003738059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., & Heinemann, T. (2015). Rethinking format: An examination of requests. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Golato, A. (2010). Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso and ach in German interaction. Discourse Studies, 12, 147–176. doi:10.1177/1461445609356497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62, 29–49. doi:10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). The semiotic body in its environment. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourses of the body (pp. 19–42). New York, NY: Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk—An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26, 515–543. doi:10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2014). Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 185–214). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T., & Matthews, B. (2015). Concessions in the audiology clinic. In F. Chevalier & J. Moore (Eds.), Avoidance and withholding in institutional interaction (pp. 337–367). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2013). Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15, 551–578. doi:10.1177/1461445613501449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. (2006). Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 48–85). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcription notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 11–38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keisanen, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (2012). The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 323–351. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.724985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H. (2011). Managing nongranting of customers’ requests in commercial service encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44, 109–134. doi:10.1080/08351813.2011.567091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (1988). Introduction: Sociological orientations to representational practice in science. Human Studies, 11, 99–116. doi:10.1007/BF00177300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48, 121–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39, 119–154. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 829–842. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 185–218. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, E., & Stokoe, E. (2014). The order of ordering: Objects, requests and embodied conduct in a public bar. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2014). When do people not use language to make requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 303–334). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2015). The request system in Italian interaction ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sanne, J. (2009). Making matters speak: Trouble-shooting in railway maintenance. In M. Büscher, D. Goodwin, & J. Mesman (Eds.), Ethnographies of diagnostic work: Dimensions of transformative practice (pp. 54–72). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L., & Raevaara, L. (2014). On the grammatical form of requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 243–268). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (1994). Gesture as communication II: The audience as co-author. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 239–267. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_5
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2008). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8, 285–301. doi:10.1075/gest.8.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tulbert, E., & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine family activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 79–92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinkhuyzen, E., & Szymanski, M. (2005). Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar