2,067
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal With, Discontinuities in Talk

REFERENCES

  • Beach, W., & Metzger, T. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23(4), 562–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x
  • Berger, I. (2011). Support and evidence for considering local contingencies in studying and transcribing silence in conversation. Pragmatics, 21(3), 291–306. doi:10.1075/prag.21.3.01ber
  • Berger, I. (2012). Inaction and silent action in interaction ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Roehampton, London, England..
  • Bergmann, J. (1988). Haustiere als kommunikative Ressourcen [Pets as communicative resources]. In H.-G. Soeffner (Ed.), Kultur und Alltag (pp. 299–312). Göttingen, Germany: Schwarz.
  • Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
  • Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2010). Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 32–37. doi:10.1080/08351810903471316
  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ergül, H. (2014). The organisation of watching television ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
  • Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Gardner, R., & Mushin, I. (2015). Expanded transition spaces: The case of Garrwa. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 251. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00251
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization. London, England: Academic Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 29–49. doi:10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29
  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
  • Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes. Semiotica, 191(1/4), 256–286.
  • Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, & L. Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2014). Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2013). Interaction and mobility. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
  • Hausendorf, H., Mondada, L., & Schmitt, R. (Eds.). (2012). Raum als interaktive ressource [Space as an interactive resource]. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
  • Hazel, S., & Mortensen, K. (2014). Embodying the institution—Object manipulation in developing interaction in study counselling meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 10–29. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016
  • Hazel, S., Mortensen, K., & Rasmussen, G. (Eds.). (2014). A body of resources—CA studies of social conduct. Special Issue. Journal of Pragmatics, 65.
  • Heath, C. (1984). Talk and recipiency. In J. Heritage & J. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 247–265). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heath, C., Jirotka, M., Luff, P., & Hindmarsh, J. (1994). Unpacking collaboration: The. Interactional Organisation of Trading in a City Dealing Room. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 3(2), 147–165. doi:10.1007/BF00773445
  • Heath, C., Sánchez Svensson, M., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., & Vom Lehn, D. (2002). Configuring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11, 317–347. doi:10.1023/A:1021247413718
  • Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Hoey, E. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
  • Holt, E. (2010). The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513–1525. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011
  • Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm;.” Paper in Linguistics, 17(2), 197–216. doi:10.1080/08351818409389201
  • Jefferson, G. (1993). Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 26(1), 1–30. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_1
  • Keevallik, L. (2014). Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 103–120. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
  • Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., & Haddington, P. (2014). Suspending action: From simultaneous to consecutive ordering of multiple courses of action. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction (pp. 109–136). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Kendon, A. (1988). Goffman’s approach to face-to-face interaction. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman (pp. 14–40). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (in press). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
  • Language and Social Interaction Archive. (2014). San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University. Retrieved from http://www.sfsu.edu/~lsi/
  • Laurier, E., Lorimer, H., Brown, B., Jones, O., Juhlin, O., Noble, A., … Weilenmann, A. (2008). Driving and “passengering”: Notes on the ordinary organization of car travel. Mobilities, 3(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/17450100701797273
  • Lerner, G. H. (1998). Completable projects and winnable games: Notes on the organization of activity. Paper presented at the fourth annual Conference on Language, Interaction, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context sensitive operation of a context free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X
  • Lerner, G. H., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 526–557. doi:10.1177/1461445607079165
  • Levinson, S. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 66–100). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Licoppe, C., & Tuncer, S. (2014). Attending to a summons and putting other activities “on hold.” In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction (pp. 167–190). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194–225. doi:10.1177/1461445607075346
  • Mondada, L. (2012). Talking and driving. Semiotica, 191(1/4), 223–256.
  • Mondada, L. (2013). Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock, & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics (pp. 247–275). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
  • Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction (pp. 3–32). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.). (2014). Interacting with objects. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Rae, J. (2001). Organizing participation in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(2), 253–278.
  • Raymond, G. (2013). At the intersection of turn and sequence organization. In B. Szczepek-Reed & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk—units of action (pp. 169–206). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Robinson, J. (2013). Overall structural organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 257–280). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Rossi, G. (2011). The Rossi Corpus of English. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (vol. 2). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–153). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65, 535–596.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 70–96). Oxford, England: Berg.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2009). A practice for (re-)exiting a sequence. In B. Frase & K. Turner (Eds.), Language in life, and a life in language (pp. 365–374). Bingley, England: Emerald.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2011). Word repeats as unit ends. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 367–380. doi:10.1177/1461445611402749
  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
  • Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. doi:10.1080/08351810903471258
  • Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & Lebaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Streeck, J., & Hartge, U. (1992). Previews: Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–157). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Szymanski, M. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28(1), 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0047404599001013