Opening Up Codings?

REFERENCES

• Antaki, C. (Ed.). (2011). Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J.-P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language,82(3), 515–535. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., Enfield, N. J., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2013). Is “Huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE,8(11), e78273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafaranga, J., & Britten, N. (2003). “Fire away”: The opening sequence in general practice consultations. Family Practice,20, 242–247. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmg303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593–611). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greatbatch, D., Heath, C., Campion, P., & Luff, P. (1995). How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction? Family Practice,12(1), 32–36. doi:10.1093/fampra/12.1.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T. (2010). The question-response system of Danish. Journal of Pragmatics,42, 2703–2725. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1999). Conversation analysis at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction,32(1–2), 69–76. doi:10.1080/08351813.1999.9683609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. Robinson, J. (2011). “Some” versus “any” medical issues: Encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied Conversation Analysis: Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk (pp. 15–31). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., Robinson, J., Elliott, M., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine,22(10), 1429–1433. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvenkari, L., Ruusuvuori, J., Saarinen, V.-M., Kivioja, M., Peräkylä, A., & Hari, R. (2013). Influence of turn-taking in a two-person conversation on the gaze of a viewer. PLoS ONE,8(8), e71569. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurvinen, E., Koskinen, I., & Battarbee, K. (2008). Prototyping social interaction. Design Issues,24(3), 46–57. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Patel, M., Kuzuoka, H., & Heath, C. (2014). Assembling collaboration: Informing the design of interaction spaces. Research on Language and Social Interaction,47, 317–329. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, R. (2005). A video analysis of how physiotherapists communicate with patients about errors of performance: Insights for practice and policy. Physiotherapy,91, 204–214. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez, L., Denef, S., & Dyrks, T. (2009). Towards human-centered support for indoor navigation. In CHI ’09 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1279–1282). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518893
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction,26(1), 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
   Google Scholar
• Steensig, J., & Heinemann, T. (2013). When “yes” is not enough—as an answer to a yes/no question. In B. Szczepek Reed & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk—Units of action (pp. 207–241). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2005). Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: Delivery formats and implications for parent resistance. Social Science & Medicine,60, 949–964. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2015 /this issue). Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction,48(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Enfield, N. J. (2010). A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics,42, 2620–2626. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society,39(1), 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0047404509990637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction,43(1), 3–31. doi:10.1080/08351810903471258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2011). Simulated interaction and communication skills training: The “Conversation Analytic Role-play Method.” In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Changing institutional practices (pp. 119–139). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2014). The conversation analytic role-play method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to simulated role-play. Research on Language and Social Interaction,47(3), 255–265. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, M., Aoki, P., Grinter, R., Hurst, A., Thornton, J., & Woodruff, A. (2008). Sotto voce: Facilitating social learning in a historic house. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW),17, 5–34. doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9067-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. L., & Smith, B. (2011). Second language development theories and technology-mediated language learning. CALICO Journal,28(2), 268–277. doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.268-277
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., & Vöge, M. (Eds.). 2010. Laughter in interaction. Special issue in honor of Gail Jefferson. Journal of Pragmatics,42(6), 1469–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2014). Intervening with conversation analysis in speech and language therapy: Improving aphasic conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction,47, 219–238. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar