Grammar and Epistemic Positioning: When Assessment Rules

References

• Bruce, T. (2004). Marking the boundaries of the “normal” in televised sports: The play-by-play of race. Media, Culture & Society, 26(6), 861–879. doi:10.1177/0163443704047030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, D. (2009). “Working your words”: Appraisal in the AFL post-match interview. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 13.1–13.17. doi:10.2104/aral0913
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. (2005). Czeching out puns and cliches in football reporting. Theory and Practice in English Studies, 3, 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. (2008). Focus on form: Foregrounding devices in football reporting. Discourse & Communication, 2(3), 219–242. doi:10.1177/1750481308091908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. (2009). “Call Doc Singh!” Textual structure and coherence in live text sports commentaries. In R. Povolná & O. Dontcheva-Navrátilová (Eds.), Cohesion and coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 124–137). Newcastle, England: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2008). On assessing situations and events in conversation: “Extraposition” and its relatives. Discourse Studies, 10(4), 443–467. doi:10.1177/1461445608091882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S., & Jones, S. C. (2010). Constructing sports stars: Appliable linguistics and the language of the media. In A. Mahboob & N. Knight (Eds.), Appliable linguistics: Reclaiming the place of language in linguistics (pp. 114–129). London, England: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Emmison, M. (1987). Victors and vanquished: The social organization of ceremonial congratulations and commiserations. Language & Communication, 7(2), 93–110. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(87)90001-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmison, M. (1988). On the interactional management of defeat. Sociology, 22(2), 233–251. doi:10.1177/0038038588022002005
   Google Scholar
• Fasulo, A., & Monzoni, C. (2009). Assessing mutable objects: A multimodal analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 362–376. doi:10.1080/08351810903296481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. (1983). Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12(2), 153–172. doi:10.1017/S0047404500009787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• File, K. A. (2012). Post-match interviews in New Zealand rugby: A conciliatory media interview genre. New Zealand English Journal, 26(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• File, K. A. (2013). The post-match interview as a discourse genre: A combined genre and register analysis (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• File, K. A. (2015). The strategic enactment of a media identity by professional team sports players. Discourse & Communication, 9(4), 441–464. doi:10.1177/1750481315576837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadessy, M. (1988). The language of written sports commentary: Soccer—a description. In K. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 17–51). London, England: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, P., & LeBaron, D. (2011). Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication, 5(1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/1750481310390161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. Pragmatics, 1, 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In S. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–190). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, D. (2011). “Steve you must feel pig sick!” Streamed video interactions between premier league managers and sports journalists as semi-scripted performances. Hermes—Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 47, 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Interrogating tears: Some uses of “tag questions” in a child protection helpline. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 69–86). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?” The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 42–68). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28(1), 1–60. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2011). Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 349–365. doi:10.1177/1461445611400665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 131–170). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, H. (2005). Invoking different types of knowledge in celebrity interviews. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 18, 93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper, K., & Lewis, R. (2013). The effect of the broadcast medium on the language of radio and television sports commentary genres: The Rugby Union Lineout. Journal of Sports Media, 8(2), 31–51. doi:10.1353/jsm.2013.0012
   Google Scholar
• Lauerbach, G. (2007). Argumentation in political talk show interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), 1388–1419. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauerbach, G. (2010). Manoeuvring between the political, the personal, and the private: Talk, image and rhythm in TV dialogue. Discourse & Communication, 4, 125–159. doi:10.1177/1750481310363980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, M. (2012). The language of online sports commentary in a comparative perspective. Lingua Posnaniensis, 54(1), 65–76. doi:10.2478/v10122-012-0006-0
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, A., & Heinemann, T. (2009). Good enough: Lowgrade assessments in caregiving situations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, A., & Mondada, L. (2009). Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 299–308. doi:10.1080/08351810903296457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, N., & Butler, C. (2011). Walking out on air. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(1), 44–64. doi:10.1080/08351813.2011.544128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, L. (2015). The celebrity talk show: Norms and practices. Discourse, Context & Media, 10(1), 27–35. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, E. R. (2003). Accomplishing closings in talk show interviews: A comparison with news interviews. Discourse Studies, 5(3), 283–302. doi:10.1177/14614456030053001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehan, E. (2005). Why TV is not our fault: Television programming, viewers and who’s really in control. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2009). The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 329–361. doi:10.1080/08351810903296473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M. (2008). The discourse of the broadcast news interview. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 260–277. doi:10.1080/14616700701848303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M. (2010). Rituals of personal experience in television news interviews. Discourse & Communication, 4, 185–211. doi:10.1177/1750481310364322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (2000). Entitlement and sincerity in broadcast interviews about Princess Diana. Media, Culture & Society, 22(2), 167–185. doi:10.1177/016344300022002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1983). Acquiring conversational competence. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sabater, C., Pena-Martínez, G., Turney, E., & Montero-Fleta, B. (2008). A spoken genre gets written: Online football commentaries in English, French, and Spanish. Written Communication, 25(2), 235–261. doi:10.1177/0741088307313174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Jauni, H. (2012). Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews. Text & Talk, 32(5), 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred-dispreferred discourse. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2000). The voice of authority: The local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts. Discourse Studies, 2(3), 354–379. doi:10.1177/1461445600002003005
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaser, J. (2003). A quantitative approach to (sub)registers: The case of “Sports Announcer Talk.” Discourse Studies, 5(3), 303–321. doi:10.1177/14614456030053002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988/89). From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 215–240. doi:10.1080/08351818809389304
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2012a). Declaratives, questioning, defeasibility. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 53–60. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2012b). “Who knows best?” Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 294–320. doi:10.1075/ps.3.2.08sid
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Lorenza, M., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thussu, D. K. (2007). News as entertainment: The rise of global infotainment. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tolson, A. (2012). “You’ll need a miracle to win this election” (J.Paxman 2005): Interviewer assertiveness in UK general elections 1983–2010. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(1), 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2010). Repetition in conversation: A look at “first and second sayings.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 407–424. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, X. (2012). Statements as questions in interviews with celebrities. Discourse, Context and Media, 1, 160–172. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar