Practices of Organizing Built Space in Videoconference-Mediated Interactions

References

• Bohannon, L. S., Herbert, A. M., Pelz, J. B., & Rantanen, E. M. (2013). Eye contact and video-mediated communication: A review. Displays, 34(2), 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono, M., Kikuchi, K., Cibulka, P., & Osugi, Y. (2014, May). A colloquial corpus of Japanese sign language: Linguistic resources for observing sign language conversations. Paper presented at the LREC-2014, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Broth, M. (2011). Att koppla ihop ansikten och namn. Om gemensamt memorerande inom ett TV-team [Linking faces and names. Shared memorizing in a TV-crew]. In R. Säljö (Ed.), Lärande och minnande som sociala praktiker (pp. 253–285). Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, K., Schembri, A., & Woll, B. (2013). Pronouns and pointing in sign languages. Lingua, 137, 230–247. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, C. (2012). Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language of Bali inscribes its signing space (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 268. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2013). A “composite utterances” approach to meaning. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body—language—communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (HSK 38.1 ed., pp. 689–706). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Torreira, F. (2016). Timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: Evidence from three languages. Discourse Processes, 53(3), 175–204. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.992680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593–611). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Girard-Groeber, S. (2015). The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, E. T. Levy, & D. McNeill (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Groeber, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2014). Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 121–136. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. (2013). Turn allocation and turn sharing. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 167–190). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2013). Towards a comparative semiotics of pointing actions in signed and spoken languages. Gesture, 13(2), 109–142. doi:10.1075/gest.13.2.01joh
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/22993
   Google Scholar
• Keating, E., Edwards, T., & Mirus, G. (2008). Cybersign and new proximities: Impacts of new communication technologies on space and language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6), 1067–1081. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, E., & Mirus, G. (2003). American Sign Language in virtual space: Interactions between deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices. Language in Society, 32(5), 693–714. doi:10.1017/S0047404503325047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2008). Some reflections on the relationship between “gesture” and “sign.” Gesture, 8(3), 348–366. doi:10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2013). How the body relates to language and communication: Outlining the subject matter. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body—language—communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (HSK 38.1 ed., pp. 7–28). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text—Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(2), 213–245. doi:10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.213
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human–Computer Interaction, 18(1–2), 51–84. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1812_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Patel, M., Kuzuoka, H., & Heath, C. (2014). Assembling collaboration: Informing the design of interaction spaces. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 317–329. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925680
   Google Scholar
• McCleary, L., & Leite, T. D. A. (2013). Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(1), 123–154. doi:10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2013). Multimodal interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body—language—communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (HSK 38.1 ed., pp. 571–583). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyürek, A. (2002). Do speakers design their cospeech gestures for their addressees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 688–704. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. D. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tapio, E. (2013). A nexus analysis of English in the everyday life of FinSL signers: A multimodal view on interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O. A. (2007). Simultaneity in signed languages. In M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson, & O. A. Crasborn (Eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Warnicke, C., & Plejert, C. (2012). Turn-organisation in mediated phone interaction using Video Relay Service (VRS). Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1313–1334. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.004
   Google Scholar