The Brain Behind the Response: Insights Into Turn-taking in Conversation From Neuroimaging

References

• Anders, S., Heinzle, J., Weiskopf, N., Ethofer, T., & Haynes, J.-D. (2011). Flow of affective information between communicating brains. NeuroImage, 54(1), 439–446. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arie, M., Tartaro, A., & Cassell, J. (2008, May). Conversational turn-taking in children with autism: Deconstructing reciprocity into specific turn-taking behaviors. Paper presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research, London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 1955). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bašnáková, J., van Berkum, J., Weber, K., & Hagoort, P. (2015). A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers? Neuropsychologia, 76, 79–91. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 24(10), 2572–2578. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilek, E., Ruf, M., Schäfer, A., Akdeniz, C., Calhoun, V. D., Schmahl, C., … Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2015). Information flow between interacting human brains: Identification, validation, and relationship to social expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 5207–5212. doi:10.1073/pnas.1421831112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaauw, E. (1994). The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication, 14(4), 359–375. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Barr, D. J., Garrod, S., & Kessler, K. (2015). Conversational interaction in the scanner: Mentalizing during language processing as revealed by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 3219–3234. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Never say no … How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. Plos One, 10(12), e0145474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation. Scientific Reports, 5, 12881. doi:10.1038/srep12881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015). Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 46–57. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiteau, T. W., Malone, P. S., Peters, S. A., & Almor, A. (2014). Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 295–311. doi:10.1037/a0031858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., Galati, A., & Kuhlen, A. K. (2010). Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 301–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown‐Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Real‐time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science, 32(4), 643–684. doi:10.1080/03640210802066816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (Ed.). (1980). Language production (Vol. 1). London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casillas, M., & Frank, M. C. (2017). The development of children’s ability to track and predict turn structure in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 234–253. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.013
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2013). Turn-constructional units and the transition-relevance place. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 151–166). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2010). Comprehension of non-conventional indirect requests: An event-related brain potential study. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction (Vol. 25). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Danks, J. H. (1977). Producing ideas and sentences. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Sentence production: Developments in research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82, 515–535. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 268. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., … Kotz, S. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. Plos ONE, 10(9), e0136100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, G., Chavez, M., Nadel, J., & Martinerie, J. (2012). Anatomical connectivity influences both intra- and inter-brain synchronizations. Plos One, 7(5), e36414. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. Plos ONE, 5(8), e12166. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283–292. doi:10.1037/h0033031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topography, 27(3), 375–392. doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Early and parallel processing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts: Neurophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 86. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Brain basis of communicative actions in language. NeuroImage, 125, 857–867. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 13, 134–184.
   Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2015). The use of content and timing to predict turn transitions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 751. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisladottir, R. S., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2016). Oscillatory brain responses reflect anticipation during comprehension of speech acts in spoken dialogue. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances. Plos ONE, 10(3), e0120068. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversation and brain damage. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274–279. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., … Poeppel, D. (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. Plos Biology, 11(12), e1001752. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Neuropragmatics. In M. S. Gazzaniga & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 667–674). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Conversation analysis: Some theoretical background. In J. Heritage & S. Clayman (Eds.), Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions (pp. 5–19). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holler, J., & Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: Optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 98. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1), 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., Wesselmeier, H., De Ruiter, J. P., & Mueller, H. M. (2014). Using the readiness potential of button-press and verbal response within spoken language processing. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 232, 24–29. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Dai, B., Peng, D., Zhu, C., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064–16069. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 250. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale [Brain potential changes at arbitrary movements and passive movements of people: Readiness potential and re-afferent potentials]. Pflüger’s Archiv für die Gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 284(1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF00412364
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., Anders, S., & Haynes, J.-D. (2015). Towards a multi-brain perspective on communication in dialogue. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 182–200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J.-D. (2012). Content-specific coordination of listeners’ to speakers’ EEG during communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 266. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223–232. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 101–130). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication—Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6–14. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberger, U., Li, S.-C., Gruber, W., & Müller, V. (2009). Brains swinging in concert: Cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neuroscience, 10(1), 22. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(3), 255–280. doi:10.1017/S0025100312000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C., De Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Early anticipation lies behind the speed of response in conversation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2530–2539. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyari, L., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2012). Prediction of turn-ends based on anticipation of upcoming words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 376. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(3), 621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 201–213. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., … Fisher, R. E. (2002). Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. NeuroImage, 16(4), 1159–1164. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostdijk, N. (2000). Het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands [The corpus of spoken Dutch]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 5, 280–284.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., Lester, J. N., & Muskett, T. (2015). Discourse/conversation analysis and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 355–359. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2665-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., Dahlslätt, K., & Maris, E. (2015). Withholding planned speech is reflected in synchronized beta-band oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 549. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Poser, B. A., Versluis, M. J., Hoogduin, J. M., & Norris, D. G. (2006). BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel‐acquired inhomogeneity‐desensitized fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 55(6), 1227–1235. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, K., & Redcay, E. (2016). Interaction matters: A perceived social partner alters the neural processing of human speech. NeuroImage, 129, 480–488. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, F., Francis, A. L., & Morgan, M. (2006). The interaction of inter-turn silence with prosodic cues in listener perceptions of “trouble” in conversation. Speech Communication, 48(9), 1079–1093. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, F., Margutti, P., & Takano, S. (2011). Judgments concerning the valence of inter-turn silence across speakers of American English, Italian, and Japanese. Discourse Processes, 48(5), 331–354. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.558002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. G., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). The effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn taking: A corpus study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 509. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lecture 1. Rules of conversational sequence. In H. Sacks & G. Jefferson (Eds.), Lectures on conversation (Vol. I, pp. 3–11). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassa, Y., Sugiura, M., Jeong, H., Horie, K., Sato, S., & Kawashima, R. (2007). Cortical mechanism of communicative speech production. NeuroImage, 37(3), 985–992. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). To Searle on conversation: A note in return. In H. Parret & J. Verschueren (Eds.), (On) Searle on conversation (pp. 113–128). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3–4), 235–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. doi:10.1017/S0047404500001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilbach, L. (2015). The neural correlates of social cognition and social interaction. In A. W. Toga (Ed.), Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference (pp. 159–164). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. B., Roebroeck, A., Renken, R., Nanetti, L., & Keysers, C. (2010). Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(20), 9388–9393. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001791107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Ed.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 123–164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 211–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(89)90008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis (Vol. 121). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–324. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14425–14430. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008662107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torreira, F., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: The time course of response planning in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 284. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ackeren, M. J., Casasanto, D., Bekkering, H., Hagoort, P., & Rueschemeyer, S.-A. (2012). Pragmatics in action: Indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(11), 2237–2247. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, D. M., Riès, S., Vanderperren, K., Vanrumste, B., Alario, F.-X., Huffel, V. S., & Burle, B. (2010). Removal of muscle artifacts from EEG recordings of spoken language production. Neuroinformatics, 8(2), 135–150. doi:10.1007/s12021-010-9071-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, B., & Macfarlane, S. (1998). Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41(3–4), 265–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmeier, H., Jansen, S., & Müller, H. M. (2014). Influences of semantic and syntactic incongruence on readiness potential in turn-end anticipation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 296. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmeier, H., & Müller, H. M. (2015). Turn-taking: From perception to speech preparation. Neuroscience Letters, 609, 147–151. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M. (Ed.). (2015). Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., De Boer, M., De Ruiter, J. P., Noordzij, M. L., Hagoort, P., & Toni, I. (2010). A dissociation between linguistic and communicative abilities in the human brain. Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. doi:10.1177/0956797609355563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 957–968. doi:10.3758/BF03206432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. P., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1986). The structure of silence between turns in two‐party conversation. Discourse Processes, 9(4), 375–390. doi:10.1080/01638538609544649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R., Chollet, F., Hadar, U., Friston, K., Hoffner, E., & Frackowiak, R. (1991). Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Brain, 114(4), 1803–1817. doi:10.1093/brain/114.4.1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar