Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation

References

• Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52, 566–580. doi:10.1111/jcom.2002.52.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. W. (1978). Sequential temporal patterns of speech and gaze in dialogue. Semiotica, 23(1–2), 29–52. doi:10.1515/semi.1978.23.1-2.29
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243–248. doi:10.1111/bjso.1981.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.82. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2016). A simple da?: Affirming responses to polar questions in Russian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 40–58. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.07.010
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, E., & Heritage, J. (2006). Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history taking. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between physicians and patients (pp. 151–184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1973). Facial expression of emotion in nonhuman primates. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review (pp. 11–90). Cambridge, MA: Malor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust and solidarity (Vol. 19, pp. 229–253). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London, England: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bonner, L., & Bruce, V. (2001). Cognitive demands of face monitoring: Evidence for visuospatial overload. Memory & Cognition, 29, 909–919. doi:10.3758/BF03195753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283–292. doi:10.1037/h0033031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., Brunner, L. J., & Fiske, D. W. (1979). Strategy signals in face-to-face interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 301–313. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, M. (1974). Defence in animals: A survey of anti-predator defences. Burnt Mill, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York, NY: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9602–9605. doi:10.1073/pnas.152159999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, B., & Ramsperger, E. (1984). Human express saccades: Extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 57, 191–195. doi:10.1007/BF00231145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1964). Behavior in public places. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, J. C. (1996). Ostensive behavior in great apes: The role of eye contact. In A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard, & S. T. Parker (Eds.), Reaching into thought: The minds of the great apes (pp. 131–151). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 272–302. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 303–317. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. (1999). Speaking in shorthand—A syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation. Speech Communication, 29(2–4), 159–176. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(99)00050-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddington, P. (2006). The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking. Text & Talk, 26(3), 281–328. doi:10.1515/TEXT.2006.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayano, K. (2013). Question design in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 395–414). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 42–68). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 88–104. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in “repetitive” responses to polar questions. In J. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions (pp. 179–192). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2015). Speaking and listening with the eyes: Gaze signaling during dyadic interactions. Plos ONE, 10(8), e0136905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, J., & Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: Optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 98. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2006). “Calm down!”: The role of gaze in the interactional management of hysteria by the police. Discourse Studies, 8(6), 745–770. doi:10.1177/1461445606069328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (1997). Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature, 387, 767–768. doi:10.1038/42842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 101–130). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, W. H. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22(2), 411–437. doi:10.1017/S0022226700010859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markson, L., & Paterson, K. B. (2009). Effects of gaze aversion on visual spatial imagination. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 553–563. doi:10.1348/000712608X371762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved from https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2010). Grammar and social relations: Alternative forms of yes/no type initiating actions in health visitor interactions. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 87–107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2013). At the intersection of turn and sequence organization: On the relevance of “slots” in type-conforming responses to polar interrogatives. In B. Szczepek Reed & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk—Units of action (pp. 169–206). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning, and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 197–249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146. doi:10.1075/gest
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organization. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 70–93). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2772–2781. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Enfield, N. J. (2010). A coding scheme for question–response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2620–2626. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 1556–1559). Paris, France: ELRA.
   Google Scholar