Multimodal Demonstrations of Understanding of Visible, Imagined, and Tactile Objects in Guided Tours

References

• Bedford, L. (2001). Storytelling: The real work of museums. Curator, 44(1), 27–34. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2001.tb00027.x
   Google Scholar
• Best, K. (2012). Making museum tours better: Understanding what a guided tour really is and what a tour guide really does. Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(1), 35–52. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.644695
   Google Scholar
• Burch, R., & Kasper, G. (2016). ‘Like a Godzilla’ Enactments and formulation in telling a disaster story in Japanese. In M. T. Prior & G. Kasper (Eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction (pp. 57–85). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Burdelski, M. (2016). We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum. Discourse & Society, 27(2), 156–171. doi:10.1177/0957926515611553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdelski, M., Kawashima, M., & Yamazaki, K. (2014). Storytelling in guided tours: Practices, engagement, and identity at a Japanese American museum. Narrative Inquiry, 24(2), 328–346. doi:10.1075/ni
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions. In J. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 123–145). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D., & Wagner, J. (2014). Objects as tools for talk. In M. Neville, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Instruction practices in German driving lessons: Differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 265–282. doi:10.1111/ijal.2018.28.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2018). Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 163–187. doi:10.1177/1461445617734347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasulo, A., & Monzoni, C. (2009). Assessing mutable objects: A multimodal analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 362–376. doi:10.1080/08351810903296481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. H. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–205). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3‐4), 272–302. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. Heritage & J. M. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 225–246). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007a). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007b). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. doi:10.1177/0957926507069457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Interstitial argument. In A. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk (pp. 85–117). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–190). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. (2003). Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 222–245). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 489–503. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y., & Aline, D. (2018). Embodied departure from focal objects in a lingua franca campus tour. Pragmatics and Society, 9(3), 454–484. doi:10.1075/ps
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kreplak, Y., & Mondémé, C. (2014). Artworks as touchable objects: Guiding perception in a museum tour for blind people. In M. Neville, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 297–317). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kushida, S. (2011). Confirming understanding and acknowledging assistance: Managing trouble responsibility in response to understanding check in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2716–2739. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBaron, C. D., & Koschmann, T. (2003). Gesture and the transparency of understanding. In P. J. Glenn, C. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 102–132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H. (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1816–1869. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2009). The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 329–361. doi:10.1080/08351810903296473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2011). Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 542–552. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2013). Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597–626. doi:10.1177/1461445613501577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). Bodies in action: Multimodal analysis of walking and talking. Language and Dialogue, 4(3), 357–403. doi:10.1075/ld
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita, E. (2005). Negotiation of contingent talk: The Japanese interactional particles ne and sa. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2008). Being out of order: Overlapping talk as evidence of trouble in airline pilots’ work. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 36–50). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.). (2014). Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152–163). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raclaw, J., Robles, J., & DiDomenico, S. M. (2016). Providing epistemic support for assessments through mobile-supported sharing activities. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 362–379. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1199089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation ( G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. doi:10.1017/S0047404500001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, S., & Kawanishi, Y. (1996). Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki, & S. Strauss (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 149–165). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar