Atypical Interaction: Conversation Analysis and Communicative Impairments

References

• Abbeduto, L., & Rosenberg, S. (1980). The communicative competence of mildly retarded adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(4), 405–426. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acton, C. (2004). A conversation analytic perspective on stammering: Some reflections and observations. Stammering Research, 1(3), 249–270.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. (2013). Recipient-side test questions. Discourse Studies, 15(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/1461445612466450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Oxford, England: Blackwell-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P., & Bauer, A. (2011). Multimodality in aphasic conversation: Why gestures sometimes do not help. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2(2), 215–243. doi:10.1558/jircd.v2i2.215
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. (2013). Proper noun anomia in conversation: A description of how a man with chronic anomia constructed referencing turns. Aphasiology, 27(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.671928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2007). Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology, 21(3/4), 256–282. doi:10.1080/02687030600911344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in dysarthria: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 38–55). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Beeke, S. (2008). Co‐constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(12), 974–990. doi:10.1080/02699200802394831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2009). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understanding problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(5), 769–783. doi:10.1080/13682820802546969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Multiple troubles and repair in voice output communication-aid mediated interaction. In: N. Noren, C Samuelsson & C. Plejert (Eds.), Aided communication in dialogical perspectives: Augmentative and alternative communication as action and participation within embodied social worlds (pp. 95–126). Guildford, England: J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1984). Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 167–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, M., & Deppermann, A. (Eds.). (2012). Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg, K., Hickson, L., & Grenness, C. (2017). Conversation breakdowns in the audiology clinic: The importance of mutual gaze. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(3), 346–355. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelke, C. R., & Higginbotham, D. J. (2013). Looking to speak: On the temporality of misalignment in interaction involving an augmented communicator using eye-gaze technology. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(1), 95–122. doi:10.1558/jircd.v4i1.95
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, T., & Penn, C. (2007). Perseveration and conversation in TBI: Response to pharmacological intervention. Aphasiology, 21(10/11), 1039–1078. doi:10.1080/02687030701198395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. C. (2012). Medical problems where talk is the problem: Current trends in conversation analytic research on aphasia, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and Alzheimer’s. Sociology Compass, 6(4), 351–364. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00452.x
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003). Conversation and brain damage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., Barnes, R., Britten, N., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). Multiple repair sequences in everyday conversations involving people with Parkinson’s disease. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50(6), 814–829. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, H. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer’s patient: An interactional sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13(4/5), 365–406. doi:10.1080/026870399402145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achievement. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 231–282). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helasvuo, M.-J., Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2004). Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(1), 1–37. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3701_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethdology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1987). Ethnomethodology. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 224–272). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh, A., & Sage, K. (Eds.). (1999). Conversation analysis and aphasia. Special Issue of Aphasiology, 13, 4–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Joaquin, A. D. L. (2010). Frontotemporal dementia, sociality, and identity: Comparing adult-child and caregiver-frontotemporal dementia interactions. Discourse Studies, 12, 443–464. doi:10.1177/1461445610370129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2015). A family living with Alzheimer’s disease: The communicative challenges. Dementia, 14(5), 555–573. doi:10.1177/1471301213502213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent, R. D. (2004). The MIT encyclopedia of communication disorders. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. (2015). Pointing as an embodied practice in aphasic interaction. Aphasiology, 29(3), 337–354. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.878451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Godt, S. (2016). Recipient participation in conversations involving participants with fluent or non-fluent aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(10), 770–789. doi:10.1080/02699206.2016.1221997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, C., Hickson, L., & Erber, N. (2006). Conversation repair and adult cochlear implantation: A qualitative case study. Cochlear Implants International, 7, 33–48. doi:10.1179/cim.2006.7.1.33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindholm, C. (2015). Parallel realities: The interactional management of confabulation in dementia care encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 176–199. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1025502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Wootton, T. (1995). Interactional and phonetic aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 9(2), 155–184. doi:10.3109/02699209508985330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, R., Duchan, D., & Weitzner-Lin, B. (1980). Analysis of breakdowns and repairs in adult aphasic conversation. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 111–116). Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mates, A., Mikesell, L., & Smith, M. S. (Eds.). (2010). Language, interaction and frontotemporal dementia: Reverse engineering the social mind. Sheffield, England: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• McCleary, L., & de Arantes Leite, T. (2013). Turn-taking in Brazilian sign language: Evidence from overlap. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(1), 123–154. doi:10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: Analyzing sign language talk. In P. Ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129–150). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. (2015) A Conversation Analytic Perspective of Institutional Telephone Calls Involving People who Stammer. Unpublished dissertation. University of Sheffield, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Damico, J. S. (2000). Partnership in conversation: A study of word search strategies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 205–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajo, K. (2013). The occurrence of ‘what’, ‘where’, ‘what house’ and other repair initiations in the home environment of hearing‐impaired individuals. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(1), 66–77. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00187.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2000). Identifying delusional discourse: Issues of rationality, reality and power. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22(5), 661–678. doi:10.1111/shil.2000.22.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore, D. (2017). Preference organization. In J. Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication (online version). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plejert, C., Lindholm, C., & Schrauf, R. W. (Eds.). (2017). Multilingual interaction and dementia. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Oxford, England: Blackwell-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Price-Williams, D., & Sabsay, S. (1979). Communicative competence among severely retarded persons. Semiotica, 26(1–2), 35–64. doi:10.1515/semi.1979.26.1-2.35
   Google Scholar
• Radford, J. (2009). Word searches: On the use of verbal and non‐verbal resources during classroom talk. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23(8), 598–610. doi:10.1080/02699200902997491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, J., & Tarplee, C. (2000). The management of conversational topic by a ten year old with pragmatic difficulties. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14(5), 387–403. doi:10.1080/02699200050051092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 73(2), 137–161. doi:10.1080/03637750600581206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2016). Accountability in social interaction. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability in social interaction (pp. 1–44). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, B. (2009). Repair sequences in dysarthric conversational speech: A study in interactional phonetics. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23(12), 887–900. doi:10.3109/02699200903062303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 261–288). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345. doi:10.1086/229903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). London, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2013). Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 41–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair for conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Conversation analysis and communication disorders. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 21–55). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schienberg, S., & Holland, A. (1980). Conversational turn taking in Wernicke’s aphasia. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 106–110). Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Skelt, L. (2010). ‘Are you looking at me?’: The influence of gaze on frequent conversation partners’ management of interaction with adults with acquired hearing impairment. Seminars in Hearing, 31(2), 116–216. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1252103
   Google Scholar
• Tetnowski, J. A., & Damico, J. S. (2001). A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26, 1–26. doi:10.1016/S0094-730X(01)00094-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (1995). Aphasia: Conversation analysis of a non-fluent aphasic person. In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), Case studies in clinical linguistics (pp. 271–292). London, England: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and a resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4/5), 327–343. doi:10.1080/026870399402127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2008). Conversation analysis and communication disorders. In M. J. Ball, M. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 92–106). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (Ed.). (2013a). Conversation analytic investigations of dysarthria and hearing impairment. Special Issue of Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2013b). Conversation analytic investigations of dysarthria and hearing impairment: The impact of motor and sensory impairments in social interaction. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(1), 1–26. doi:10.1558/jircd.v4i1.1
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2013c). Conversation analysis and communication disorders. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 962–967). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2014). Intervening with conversation analysis in speech and language therapy: Improving aphasic conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 219–238. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (Ed.). (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Special Issue of Aphasiology, 29, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2003). Adapting to conversation: On the use of linguistic resources by speakers with fluent aphasia in the construction of turns at talk. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 59–89). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2010). Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 57–84. doi:10.1080/08351810903471506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Bloch, S., & Clarke, M. (2011). On the use of graphic resources in interaction by people with communication disorders. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 152–168). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Gower, M., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2007). Adapting to conversation as a language-impaired speaker: Changes in aphasic turn construction over time. Communication and Medicine, 4(1), 79–97. doi:10.1515/CAM.2007.009
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182. doi:10.1177/019027250606900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton, A. J. (1999). An investigation of delayed echoing in a child with autism. First Language, 19(57), 359–381. doi:10.1177/014272379901905704
   Google Scholar
• Yearley, S., & Brewer, J. D. (1989). Stigma and conversational competence: A conversation analytic study of the mentally handicapped. Human Studies, 12, 97–117. doi:10.1007/BF00142841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar