Waiting to Inhale: On Sniffing in Conversation

References

• Aare, K., Włodarczak, M., & Heldner, M. (2015). Inhalation amplitude and turn-taking in spontaneous Estonian conversations. In M. Svensson Lundmark, G. Ambrazaitis, & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Fonetik 2015, Lund, June 8 –10, 2015 (pp. 1–5). Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Arzi, A., Shedlesky, L., Secundo, L., & Sobel, N. (2014). Mirror sniffing: Humans mimic olfactory sampling behavior. Chemical Senses, 39(4), 277–281. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjt113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldauf-Quilliatre, H. (2016). “pf” indicating a change in orientation in French interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 89–107. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A., & Metzger, T. R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23(4), 562–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broth, M. (2011). The theatre performance as interaction between actors and their audience. Nottingham French Studies, 50(2), 113–133. doi:10.3366/nfs.2011-2.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, R. (2016). Don’t make me laugh: Responsive laughter in (dis)affiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 73–88. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). A sequential approach to affect: The case of ‘disappointment’. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp. 94–123). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frumin, I., Perl, O., Endevelt-Shapira, Y., & Sobel, N. (2015). A social chemosignaling function for human handshaking. ELife, 4, e05154. doi:10.7554/eLife.05154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787–815. doi:10.2307/413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Alim, H. S. (2010). “Whatever (neck roll, eye roll, teeth suck)”: The situated coproduction of social categories and identities through stancetaking and transmodal stylization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 179–194. doi:10.1111/jola.2010.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarsten, J., Harris, R., Henriksson, N., & Włodarczak, M. (2015). Temporal aspects of breathing and turn-taking in Swedish multiparty conversations. In M. Svensson Lundmark, G. Ambrazaitis, & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Fonetik 2015, Lund, Sweden, June 8–10, 2015 (pp. 47–50). Lund, Sweden: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A. (2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription, and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 251–290. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2007). Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(1), 89–116. doi:10.1080/08351810701331299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Varney, S. (2013). Beyond ((laughter)): Some notes on transcription. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 25–38). London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 88–104. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2017). Sequence recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 47–63. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2018a). How speakers continue with talk after a lapse in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 329–346. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1485234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2018b). Drinking for speaking: The multimodal organization of drinking in conversation. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 1(1). doi:10.7146/si.v1i1.105498
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). Conversation analysis. In A. M. B. De Groot & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 151–173). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. (2020). Non-lexical ‘moans’: Response cries in board game interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y., & Aline, D. (2012). Doing being interrupted by noise as a resource in second language interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 54–70. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1980). On “trouble‐premonitory” response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 153–185. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9, 47–96. doi:10.1007/BF00148125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166–196). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–33). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1977). Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter. Pragmatics Microfiche, 1, A2–D9.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2011). The terms of not knowing. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 184–206). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12–32. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2013). On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 95–134). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., & Linton, L. (2004). Before beginning: Breath taking in conversation (Unpublished manuscript). University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., & Raymond, G. (2017). On the practical re-intentionalization of body behavior: Action pivots in the progressive realization of embodied conduct. In G. Raymond, G. H. Lerner, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 299–313). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2), 185–204. doi:10.1007/BF00148126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2004). Abrupt-Joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(8), 1375–1403. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2020). Audible sniffs: Smelling-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 140–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in english conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Lerner, G. H. (2014). A body and its involvements. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction (pp. 227–246). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2020). On ‘whistle’ sound objects in English everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 164–187.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1989). Lecture two: On suicide threats getting laughed off. Human Studies, 12, 235–243.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’and other things that come between sentences. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, 71, 93.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 111–151. doi:10.1007/BF00148124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2011). Word repeats as unit ends. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 367–380. doi:10.1177/1461445611402749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M., & Auer, P. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung–Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2013). Having the last laugh: On post completion laughter particles. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 91–106). London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. doi:10.1080/08351810701691123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367–392. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streicher, H. Z., Gabow, P. A., Moss, A. H., Kono, D., & Kaehny, W. D. (1981). Syndromes of toluene sniffing in adults. Annals of Internal Medicine, 94(6), 758–762. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-94-6-758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticca, A. C. (2013). Laughter in bilingual medical interactions: Displaying resistance to doctor’s talk in a Mexican village. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 107–130). London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Torreira, F., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: The time course of response planning in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 284. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachowiak, M. (2011). All in a sniff: Olfaction as a model for active sensing. Neuron, 71, 962–973. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesson, D. W. (2013). Sniffing behavior communicates social hierarchy. Current Biology, 23(7), 575–580. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Włodarczak, M., & Heldner, M. (2017). Respiratory constraints in verbal and non-verbal communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 708. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229. doi:10.1017/S0025100311000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H. (1993). Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency revisited. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 179–194. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_4
   Google Scholar