References
- Bolden, G., & Robinson, J. D. (2011). Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01528.x
- Clayman, S. E. (2013). Agency in response: The role of prefatory address terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001
- Clift, R. (2020). Stability and visibility in embodied action: The ‘palm up’ in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.005
- Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. J. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02
- Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. J. (2001). In the heat of the sequence: Interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk. Language in Society, 30(4), 611–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501004043
- Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
- Goffman, E. (1963). Behaviour in public places. Free Press.
- Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9
- Heinemann, T. (2008). Questions of accountability: Yes-no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085590
- Hepburn, A. (2019). The preference for self-direction as a parents’ resource for socialization. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1664679
- Heritage, J. (2005). Revisiting authority in physician-patient interaction. In M. Maxwell, D. Kovarsky, & J. Duchan (Eds.), Diagnosis as Cultural Practice (pp. 83–102). Mouton De Gruyter.
- Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
- Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Erlbaum.
- Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on “latency” in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9, 153–183. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20008965
- Kent, A. (2012). Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457485
- Koshik, I. (2017). Response to Wh-question challenges. In G. Raymond, G. H. Lerner, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 81–103). John Benjamins.
- Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society, 22(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017103
- Local, J., & Walker, G. (2008). Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk, 28(6), 723–747. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.037
- Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Pearce, S., & Pickard, H. (2013). How therapeutic communities work: Specific factors related to positive outcome. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 59(7), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764012450992
- Pino, M. (2018). Invoking the complainer’s past transgressions: A practice for undermining complaints in therapeutic community meetings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1449453
- Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152–163). Cambridge University Press.
- Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
- Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2020). Shaming interrogatives: Admonishments, the social psychology of emotion, and discursive practices of behaviour modification in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12346
- Robinson, J. D., & Bolden, G. (2010). Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 501–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610371051
- Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Volume 1. Oxford.
- Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124
- Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903
- Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press.
- Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041
- Sidnell, J. (2007). “Look”-prefaced turns in first and second position: Launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607076204
- Sidnell, J. (2017). Action in interaction is conduct under a description. Language in Society, 46(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000173
- Sterponi, L. (2003). Account episodes in family discourse: The making of morality in everyday interaction. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005001840
- Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258
- Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E. (2011). How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of polish Trzeba x (“One Needs to x”). Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.591900