Handling Turn Transitions in Australian Tactile Signed Conversations

References

• Access Economics. (2007). Making sense: The economic impact of dual sensory impairment and multiple disabilities in Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, F., Ali, K., & Braithwaite, B. (2021). Intralinguistic and crosslinguistic variation in the turn-taking organization between deaf-blind signers: New evidence from Bay Islands Sign Language. Paper presented at NWAV49. Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44Eg2acgGTI&ab_channel=BenBraithwaite
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (1977). Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In L. A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American sign language (pp. 215–236). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C., & Padden, C. A. (1978). Focusing on the nonmanual component of American Sign Language. In P. A. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 27–57). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balder, A., Bosman, I., Roets, L., Schermer, T., & Stiekema, T. (2000). Over Doofblindheid. Communicatie en Omgang. HvU, Seminarium voor Orthopedagogiek. [On deafblind, communication and interaction.].
   Google Scholar
• Berge, S. S., & Raanes, E. (2013). Coordinating the chain of utterances: An analysis of communicative flow and turn taking in an interpreted group dialogue for Deaf-Blind persons. Sign Language Studies, 13(3), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2013.0007
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A., & Mondada, L. (Eds.). (2021). Touch in social interaction: Touch, language and body. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Checchetto, A., Geraci, C., Cecchetto, C., & Zucchi, S. (2018). The language instinct in extreme circumstances: The transition to tactile Italian Sign Language (LISt) by Deafblind signers. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibulka, P. (2016). On how to do things with holds: Manual movement phases as part of interactional practices in signed conversation. Sign Language Studies, 16(4), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2016.0015
   Google Scholar
• Clift, R., & Raymond, C. W. (2018). Actions in practice: On details in collections. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 90–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, J., & Sutton‐Spence, R. (2001). Turn-taking patterns in deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00162
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Petronio, K. (1998). What happens in Tactile ASL? In C. Lucas (Ed.), Pinky extension and eye gaze: Language use in deaf communities (pp. 18–37). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. (2015). Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., Jr. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., Jr. (1974). On the structure of speaker–auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society, 3(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004322
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2012). Sensing the rhythms of everyday life: Temporal integration and tactile translation in the seattle deaf-blind community. Language in Society, 41(1), 29–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451100090X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2014a). From compensation to integration: Effects of the pro-tactile movement on the sublexical structure of Tactile American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 69, 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2014b). Language Emergence in the Seattle DeafBlind Community. [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (forthcoming). The hands. In M. Bucholtz & K. Hall (Eds.), Parsing the body: Language and the social life of embodiment. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ELAN (Version 6.2) [Computer software]. (2021). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima, S. (2011). Mourousha toshite ikite: Yubitenji niyoru komyunikeeshon no fukkatsu to saisei [Living as Deafblind: Revival and regeneration of communication by finger-braille]. Akashi Shoten.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R., Fitzgerald, R., & Mushin, I. (2009). The underlying orderliness in turn-taking. Examples from Australian talk. Australian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 65–89. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.201002705
   Google Scholar
• Girard-Groeber, S. (2015). The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard-Groeber, S. (2020). Swiss German and Swiss German Sign Language resources in repair initiations: An examination of two types of classroom. In R. Wilkinson, J. Rae, & G. Rasmussen (Eds.), Atypical interaction: The impact of communicative impairments within everyday talk (pp. 435–464). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, D. (1994). A world without words: The social construction of children born deaf and blind. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2006). Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in Aphasia. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 97–125). Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Groeber, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2014). Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, C., Fleetwood, E., & Ernest, M. (1995). An analysis of ASL variation within DeafBlind-DeafBlind interaction: Question forms, backchanneling, and turn-taking. In L. Byers, J. Chaiken, & M. Mueller (Eds.), Gallaudet University Communication Forum 1995 (pp. 103–140). Gallaudet University School of Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., Casillas, M., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (2016). Turn-taking in human communicative interaction. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88919-825-2
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, S., Bartlett, M., Manns, H., & Willoughby, L. (2019). The Challenges of multimodality and multi-sensoriality: Methodological issues in analyzing tactile signed interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2016). Auslan Corpus Annotation Guidelines; November 2016 revisions. Auslan Signbank. Available from https://www.academia.edu/29690332/Auslan_Corpus_Annotation_Guidelines_November_2016_revision
   Google Scholar
• Kikuchi, K. (2011). Nishakan no shuwa kaiwa deno junban koutai ni okeru shisen idou no bunseki [An analysis of gaze shifts in turn-taking in sign language conversations]. The Japanese Journal of Language in Society, 14(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.19024/jajls.14.1_154
   Google Scholar
• Kusters, A. (2017). “Our hands must be connected”: Visible gestures, tactile gestures and objects in interactions featuring a deafblind customer in Mumbai. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human ‘interaction engine. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (pp. 39–69). Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Manns, H., Willoughby, L., Iwasaki, S., & Bartlett, M. (2022). Intersubjectivity and (non-)shared modes of interaction in Australian tactile signing. Lingua, 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103295
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. B. (1995). Turn-taking and eye gaze in sign conversations between deaf Filipinos, and C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities (pp. 272–306). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCleary, L., & Leite, T. A. (2013). Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(1), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v4i1.123
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: Analyzing sign language talk. In ten Have, Paul, & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129–150). International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, J. (2001). Tactile sign language: Turn-taking and questions in signed conversations of deaf-blind people. Signum.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, J. (2013). Tactile signing with one-handed perception. Sign Language Studies, 13(2), 238–263. doi:10.1353/sls.2013.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, J. (2000). Tactile Swedish Sign Language: Turn-taking in signed conversations of people who are deaf and blind. In M. Metzger (Ed.), Bilingualism and identity in Deaf communication (pp. 187–203). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, J., Raanes, E., & Ferrara, L. (2015). Co-forming real space blends in tactile signed language dialogues. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(2), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speaker. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, K., & Dively, V. (2006). Yes, no, visibility, and variation in ASL and tactile ASL. Sign Language Studies, 7(1), 57–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2006.0032
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, R. (2012). 23 Manual communication systems: Evolution and variation. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook (pp. 513–551). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Quinto-Pozos, D. (2002). Deixis in the visual-gestural and tactile-gestural modalities. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 442–467). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raanes, E. (2011). Tegnrom og taktilt tegnspråk. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 29(1), 54–86. https://ojs.novus.no/index.php/NLT/article/view/184
   Google Scholar
• Raanes, E., & Berge, S. S. (2017). Sign language interpreters’ use of haptic signs in interpreted meetings with deafblind persons. Journal of Pragmatics, 107, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, C. M., Delhorne, L. A., Durlach, N. I., & Fischer, S. D. (1990). A study of the tactual and visual reception of fingerspelling. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 33(4), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3304.786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, C. M., Delhorne, L. A., Durlach, N. I., & Fischer, S. D. (1995). A study of the tactual reception of sign language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38(2), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3802.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis volume 1. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction (pp. 70–96). Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘un huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 198, Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (2004). Eléments pour une analyse de la langue des signes tactile pratiquée par les personnes sourdes-aveugles [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. St Denis Département de Sciences du Langage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (2008). Tactile sign language corpora: Capture and annotation issues. In LERC 2008 Proceedings for the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora (pp.170–173).
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10587–10592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2013). Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herreweghe, M. V. (2002). Turn-taking mechanisms and active participation in meetings with Deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Turn-taking, fingerspelling, and contact in signed languages. Sociolinguistics in deaf communities series 8 (pp. 73–103). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. B., & Petitto, L. (1983). Discourse structure in American sign language conversations (or, how to know a conversation when you see one). Discourse Processes, 6(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538309544565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2019). Atypical interaction: Conversation analysis and communicative impairments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby, L., Iwasaki, S., Bartlett, M., Manns, H. (2018). Tactile sign languages. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, & J. Blommaert (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 239–258).John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, L., Manns, H., Iwasaki, S., & Bartlett, M. (2014). Misunderstanding and repair in Tactile Auslan. Sign Language Studies, 14(4), 419–443. doi:10.1353/sls.2014.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, L., Manns, H., Iwasaki, S., & Bartlett, M. (2019). Are you trying to be funny? Communicating humour in deafblind conversations. Discourse Studies, 21(5), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619846704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby, L., Manns, H., Iwasaki, S., & Bartlett, M. (2020). From seeing to feeling: How do deafblind people adapt visual sign languages? In K. Allan (Ed.), Dynamic language changes: Looking within and across languages (pp. 235–252). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar