Look At/Check X: An Attention-And-Approval-Seeking Device

References

• Akhtar, N. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). Joint attention and vocabulary development: A critical look. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00014.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In M. Chris & D. P. J (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806617
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2011). The cultural organization of attention. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 29–55). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Burdelski, M. (2015). Reported speech as cultural gloss and directive: Socializing norms of speaking and acting in Japanese caregiver–child triadic interaction. Text & Talk, 35(5), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdelski, M. & Morita, E. (2017). Young children’s initial assessments in japanese. In A. Bateman & A. Church (Eds.), Children’s knowledge-in-interaction (pp. 231–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_13
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C. W. & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Mobilising recipiency: Child participation and ‘rights to speak’ in multi-party family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.012
   Google Scholar
• Craven, A. & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, C. (2009). Young children’s engagement with digital texts and literacies in the home: Pressing matters for the teaching of English in the early years of schooling. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deSouza, D. K. (2021). Everyday updates: How parents ask about their young children’s lived experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(4), 1172–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520982369
   Google Scholar
• Filipi, A. (2009). Toddler and parent interaction: The organisation of gaze, pointing and vocalisation. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.192
   Google Scholar
• Gan, Y. (2021). ‘Awww, she is feeding you’: Young children’s (dis)engagement in video calls with their migrant parents. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 5(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.18089
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., Girton, G., Linvingston, E., & Sacks, H. (1982). Studies of Kids’ Culture and Kids’ Talk [ Unpublished research project]. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk - an Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(4–5), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2013). Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care and mundane creativity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–190). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. & Kyratzis, A. (2007). Children socializing children: Practices for negotiating the social order among peers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”;. Paper in Linguistics, 17(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201
   Google Scholar
• Keel, S. (2015). Young children’s embodied pursuits of a response to their initial assessments. Journal of Pragmatics, 75, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel, S. (2016). Socialization: Parent-child interaction in everyday life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keel, S. (2020). Membership categorisation and the notion of “omni-relevance” in everyday family interactions. In R. J. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, & W. Housley (Eds.), On sacks: Methodology, materials, and inspirations (pp. 156–171). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. & Zimmerman, D. H. (2006). “Observability” in the interactions of very young children. Communication Monographs, 73(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750600559673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. & Zimmerman, D. H. (2007). Joint attention as action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 592–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, R. W. (1975). Conceptions and models of childhood. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 180–193). Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. Heritage & J. M. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (volumes I and II). Blackwell. (G. Jefferson Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Searles, D. K. (2018). ‘Look it daddy’: Shows in family Facetime calls. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(1), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.32576
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2014). Who knows best?”: Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. In J. Nuckolls & L. Michael (Eds.), Evidentiality in interaction (pp. 127–154). John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Siitonen, P., Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2021). Language and the moving body: Directive actions with the Finnish kato “look” in nature-related activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661784. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661784
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. & Koski, S. (2018). Intersubjectivity and the domains of social interaction: Proposal of a cross-sectional approach. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22(1), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0003
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674
   Google Scholar
• Tam, C. L. (2021). Children’s demands for parental action. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 5(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.18054
   Google Scholar
• Tarplee, C. (1993). Working on talk: The collaborative shaping of linguistic skills within child-adult interaction. University of York. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/9808/
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2015). Grammar in everyday talk. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, A. J. (2005). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar