Cries of Pleasure and Pain: Vocalizations Communicating How Touch Feels in Romantic Relationships

References

• Anikin, A. (2020). The link between auditory salience and emotion intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 34(6), 1246–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1736992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdelski, M., & Cekaite, A. (2020). Control touch in caregiver–child interaction: Embodied organization in triadic mediation of peer conflict in Swedish and Japanese. In C. Asta & M. Lorenza (Eds.), Touch in social interaction (pp. 103–123). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R. S. Y. (2022). Improvisations in the embodied interactions of a non-speaking autistic child and his mother: Practices for creating intersubjective understanding. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(1), 155–191. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coy, M., Kelly, L., Vera-Gray, F., Garner, M., & Kanyeredzi, A. (2016). From ‘no means no’ to ‘an enthusiastic yes’: Changing the discourse on sexual consent through sex and relationships education. In V. Sundaram & H. Sauntson (Eds.), Global perspectives and key debates in sex and relationships education: Addressing issues of gender, sexuality, plurality and power (pp. 84–99). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500229_6
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Debrot, A., Stellar, J. E., MacDonald, G., Keltner, D., & Impett, E. A. (2021). Is touch in romantic relationships universally beneficial for psychological well-being? The Role of attachment avoidance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(10), 1495–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220977709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2020). Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edvardsson, J. D., Sandman, P.-O., & Rasmussen, B. H. (2003). Meanings of giving touch in the care of older patients: Becoming a valuable person and professional. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(4), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00754.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
   Google Scholar
• Field, T. (2014). Touch, second edition. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Bobbs-Merrill Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Behaviour in public places: Notes on the social order of gatherings. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.2307/413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goico, S., Gan, Y., Katila, J., & Goodwin, M. H. (2021). Capturing multisensoriality: Introduction to a special issue on sensoriality in video-based fieldwork. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i3.128144
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 73–102). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grahn, I.-L., Lindholm, C., & Huhtamäki, M. (2023). Accounting for changes in series of vocalisations – Professional vision in a gym-training session. Journal of Pragmatics, 212(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Gratier, M., & Apter-Danon, G. (2009). The improvised musicality of belonging: Repetition and variation in mother-infant vocal interaction. In M. Stephen & T. Colwyn (Eds.), Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship (pp. 301–327). Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gronert, N. M., & Raclaw, J. (2019). Contesting the terms of consent: How university students (dis)align with institutional policy on sexual consent. Gender and Language, 13(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.34939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulledge, A. K., Gulledge, M. H., & Stahmannn, R. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180390201936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halley, J. (2016). The move to affirmative consent. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(1), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/686904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2012). Crying and crying responses. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 195–211). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertenstein, M. J. (2002). Touch: Its communicative functions in infancy. Human Development, 45(2), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000048154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. (2020). Nonlexical “Moans”: Response cries in board game interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L. (2023). Prosody is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language & Communication, 88, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E., Keevallik, L., & Löfgren, A. (2021). Suspending syntax: Bodily strain and progressivity in talk. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.663307
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, C., Plantin, L., & Elmerstig, E. (2020). Complexities of sexual consent: Young people’s reasoning in a Swedish context. Psychology & Sexuality, 11(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1769163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husso, M. (2003). Parisuhdeväkivalta: Lyötyjen aika ja tila. Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Jean, A. D. L., & Stack, D. M. (2009). Functions of maternal touch and infants’ affect during face-to-face interactions: New directions for the still-face. Infant Behavior & Development, 32(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L. (2015). Negotiating pain: The joint construction of a child’s bodily sensation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, U., Routarinne, S., & Tainio, L. (2023). “Don’t touch”: Negotiating the boundaries of acceptable touching in classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 41, 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, J. (2018). Touch between mother and child as affective practice: Reproducing affective inequalities in haptic negotiations of bodily borders and the interpersonal space. In T. Juvonen & M. Kolehmainen (Eds.), Affective inequalities in intimate relationships (pp. 201–217). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, J., & Cekaite, A. (2023). Trajectories of love: Affective reciprocity during kissing in the everyday life of romantic couples. Journal of Pragmatics, 214, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2020). When a dance hold becomes illegitimate. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in social interaction: Touch, language, and body (pp. 124–149). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2023). Strain grunts and the organization of participation. In L. Mondada & A. Peräkylä (Eds.), Body, participation, and the self: New perspectives on Goffman in language and interaction (pp. 139–167). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., Weatherall, A., & Wiggins, S. (2023). Sounding others’ sensations in interaction. Discourse Processes, 60(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2165027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R. (2020). Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. A., Nixon, L., McClurg, C., Scherpbier, A., King, N., & Dornan, T. (2018). Experience of touch in health care: A Meta-ethnography across the health care professions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317707726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, M., & Kinnunen, T. (2019). Touch and affect: analysing the archive of touch biographies. Body and Society, 25(1), 29–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroshima, S. (2020). Therapist and patient accountability through tactility and sensation in medical massage sessions. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i1.120251
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human “interaction engine.” In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (pp. 39–69). Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lidman, S. (2021). Familial control, collectivity and gendered shame: Past and present vulnerabilities. In M. Husso, Karkulehto, S., Saresma, T., Laitila, A., Eilola, J., & Siltala, H. (Eds.), Violence, gender and affect: Interpersonal, institutional and ideological practices (pp. 28–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maclaren, K. (2014). Touching matters: Embodiments of intimacy. Emotion, Space and Society, 13, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., & Stevanovic, M. (2023). Sexual consent as an interactional achievement: Overcoming ambiguities and social vulnerabilities in the initiations of sexual activities. Discourse Studies, 25(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221119101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, L. M., Lindé, J., Olausson, H., Heilig, M., & Morrison, I. (2018). Putting a good face on touch: Facial expression reflects the affective valence of caress-like touch across modalities. Biological Psychology, 137, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, A. (2019). Pain and the collision of expertise in primary care physical exams. Discourse Studies, 21(5), 522–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619846707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs (R. C. McCleary, Trans.) Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomemology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.). (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2021). Orchestrating multi-sensoriality in tasting sessions: Sensing bodies, normativity, and language. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., Monteiro, D. T., & Tekin, B. (2020). The tactility and visibility of kissing: Intercorporeal configurations of kissing bodies in family photography sessions. In Touch in Social Interaction (pp. 54–80). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montagu, A. (1971). Touching: The human significance of the skin. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2016). Syntactical constructions and tactile orientations: Procedural utterances and procedures in massage therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 98, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomikou, I. (2023). Joining actions through effort sounds: Mothers and infants in routine activities. Language & Communication, 91, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popova, M. (2019). Sexual Consent. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Główka, K., Nomikou, I., & Rossmanith, N. (2022). Time-to-smile, time-to-speak, time-to-resolve: Timescales for shaping engagement in language. Language Sciences, 93, 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, E. (2017). Description of membership and enacting membership: Seeing-a-lift, being a team. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roald, T., Levin, K., & Køppe, S. (2018). Affective incarnations: Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s challenge to bodily theories of emotion. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 38(4), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000101
   Google Scholar
• Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Calder, A. J., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2251–2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003721642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, A. (2002). Visual perception in the newborn infant: Issues and debates. Intellectica, 1(34), 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Smith Stover, C. (2005). Domestic violence research: What have we learned and where do we go from here? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504267755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2013). Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.). In Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–347). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (2012). Communicative musicality: The human impulse to create and share music. In D. Hargreaves, D. Miell, & R. MacDonald (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 259–284). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963001006552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A. (2023). “Oh my god that would hurt”: Pain cries in feminist self-defence classes. Language & Communication, 90, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A., Keevallik, L., La, J., Dowell, T., & Stubbe, M. (2021). The multimodality and temporality of pain displays. Language & Communication, 80, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2013). The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Keevallik, L. (2021). Parental lip-smacks during infant mealtimes: Multimodal features and social functions. Interactional Linguistics, 1(2), 241–272. https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21006.wig
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Keevallik, L. (2023). Transformations of disgust in interaction: The intertwinement of face, sound and the body. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i2.134841
   Google Scholar