REFERENCES
- Alio JL, Abdelghany AA, Fernandez-Buenaga R. Enhancements after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 17;26:50–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000111.
- Sales CS, Manche EE. Managing residual refractive error after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jun 23;41:1289–1299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.001.
- Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec 20;19:13–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f1c5ad.
- Cui Y, Meng Q, Guo H, et al. Biometry and corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery candidates from Southern China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Aug 26;40:1661–1669. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.039.
- Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refr Surg. 1992;18:125–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80917-0.
- Ademola-Popoola DS, Nzeh DA, Saka SE, et al. Comparison of ocular biometry measurements by applanation and immersion A-scan techniques. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2015 May 31;27:110–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2015.12.002.
- Hui S, Yi L. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov 06;62:931–934. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.143930.
- Moon SW, Lim SH, Lee HY. Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 02;28:444–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.444.
- Landers J, Goggin M. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug 26;37:566–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02091.x.
- Wang JK, Chang SW. Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013 May 03;6:150–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.3980/j.2222-3959.2013.02.08.
- Eleftheriadis H. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul 26;87:960–963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.8.960.
- Tehrani M, Krummenauer F, Kumar R, et al. Comparison of biometric measurements using partial coherence interferometry and applanation ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Apr 11;29:747–752. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01739-x.
- Goebels S, Pattmoller M, Eppig T, et al. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec 26;41:2387–2393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.028.
- Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Oct 25;238:765–773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170000188.
- Tappeiner C, Rohrer K, Frueh BE, et al. Clinical comparison of biometry using the non-contact optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS 900) and contact ultrasound biometer (Tomey AL-3000) in cataract eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 May 08;94:666–667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.167700.
- Bjelos Roncevic M, Busic M, Cima I, et al. Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep 21;249:69–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1509-4.
- Nakhli FR. Comparison of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound measurements of the axial length of the eye. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 05;28:287–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.04.003.
- Chia TMT, Nguyen MT, Jung HC. Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 22;12:1757–1762. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S170301.
- McAlinden C, Wang Q, Pesudovs K, et al. Axial length measurement failure rates with the IOLMaster and lenstar LS 900 in eyes with cataract. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10:e0128929. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128929.
- Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, et al. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug 21;94:106–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.161729.
- Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, et al. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr 22;93:949–953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.156554.
- Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep 13;153:55–61 e52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.012.
- Zhao J, Chen Z, Zhou Z, et al. Evaluation of the repeatability of the L enstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes. Clin Exp Optometry. 2013;96:92–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00793.x.
- Liu Y, Wang Z, Mu G. Effects of measurement errors on refractive outcomes for pseudophakic eye based on eye model. Optik. 2010;121:1347–1354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2009.01.022.
- Schulle KL, Berntsen DA. Repeatability of on- and off-axis eye length measurements using the lenstar. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Dec 05;90:16–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182780bfd.
- Grover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, et al. Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec 17;51:2644–2647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4774.
- Uozato H, Shimizu K, Minei R, et al. Effect of accommodation on axial length measurement in optical coherence biometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4080.
- Mallen EA, Kashyap P, Hampson KM. Transient axial length change during the accommodation response in young adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar 01;47:1251–1254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1086.