REFERENCES
- Xiao W, Chen X, Yan W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of epiretinal membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e014644. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014644.
- Michels RG. Surgical management of epiretinal membranes. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1979;99:54–62.
- Fraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, et al. Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):34–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01443-4.
- Scheerlinck LM, van der Valk R, Van Leeuwen R. Predictive factors for postoperative visual acuity in idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(3):203–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12537.
- Miliatos I, Lindgren G. Epiretinal membrane surgery evaluated by subjective outcome. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(1):52–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13001.
- Fox SD M Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center Internet & Technology. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Published 2013. Updated January 15, 2013. Accessed July 30, 2020.
- Amante DJ, Hogan TP, Pagoto SL, et al. Access to care and use of the Internet to search for health information: results from the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e106. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4126.
- Zhang J, Marmor R, Huh J. Towards supporting patient decision-making in online diabetes communities. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1893–1902.
- Feler J, Tan A, Sammann A, et al. Decision making among patients with unruptured aneurysms: a qualitative analysis of online patient forum discussions. World Neurosurg. 2019;131:e371–e378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.161.
- Baker DM, Marshall JH, Lee MJ, et al. A systematic review of internet decision-making resources for patients considering surgery for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(8):1293–1300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000001198.
- Kloosterboer A, Yannuzzi NA, Patel NA, et al. Assessment of the quality, content, and readability of freely available online information for patients regarding diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(11):1240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3116.
- Readable. https://readable.io/. Accessed February 1, 2020.
- Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244–1245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039.
- Doak CC, Doak LG, Friedell GH, et al. Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48(3):151–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.48.3.151.
- Weiss B. Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2003.
- Lau D, Ogbogu U, Taylor B, et al. Stem cell clinics online: the direct-to-consumer portrayal of stem cell medicine. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(6):591–594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.001.