290
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Aiding Adherence to Glaucoma Medications: A Systematic Review

, BSORCID Icon, , MD, PhDORCID Icon & , MD, MHS
Pages 313-323 | Received 21 Jun 2021, Accepted 27 Jul 2021, Published online: 17 Aug 2021

REFERENCES

  • Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:887–888.
  • Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844–851.
  • Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP, Bunce C, et al. Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9975):1295–1304. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62111-5.
  • Kass MA, Meltzer DW, Gordon M, Cooper D, Goldberg J. Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(5):515–523. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(86)90939-6.
  • Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Gelb L, et al. Using pharmacy claims data to study adherence to glaucoma medications: methodology and findings of the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study (GAPS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(11):5052–5057. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0290.
  • Gurwitz JH, Glynn RJ, Monane M, et al. Treatment for glaucoma: adherence by the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(5):711–716. doi:10.2105/AJPH.83.5.711.
  • Schwartz GF, Quigley HA. Adherence and persistence with glaucoma therapy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53(Suppl1):S57–68. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.002.
  • Sayner R, Carpenter DM, Blalock SJ, et al. Accuracy of patient-reported adherence to glaucoma medications on a visual analog scale compared with electronic monitors. Clin Ther. 2015;37(9):1975–1985. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.008.
  • Newman-Casey PA, Robin AL, Blachley T, et al. The most common barriers to glaucoma medication adherence: a cross-sectional survey. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1308–1316. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.026.
  • Newman-Casey PA, Niziol LM, Gillespie BW, Janz NK, Lichter PR, Musch DC. The association between medication adherence and visual field progression in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(4):477–483. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.022.
  • Rossi GC, Pasinetti GM, Scudeller L, Radaelli R, Bianchi PE. Do adherence rates and glaucomatous visual field progression correlate? Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21(4):410–414. doi:10.5301/EJO.2010.6112.
  • Beckers HJ, Webers CA, Busch MJ, Brink HM, Colen TP, Schouten JS. Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(7):610–618. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02571.x.
  • Blondeau P, Carbonneau M, Esper P, Turcotte PC. A 2-hour information session and patient recall has minimal impact on glaucoma-treatment persistence in a mature practice. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(6):379–382. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182127a9b.
  • Boland MV, Chang DS, Frazier T, Plyler R, Jefferys JL, Friedman DS. Automated telecommunication-based reminders and adherence with once-daily glaucoma medication dosing: the automated dosing reminder study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(7):845–850. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.857.
  • Cate H, Bhattacharya D, Clark A, Fordham R, Notley C, Broadway DC. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to estimate the effects and costs of a patient centred educational intervention in glaucoma management. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:57. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-12-57.
  • Cate H, Bhattacharya D, Clark A, Fordham R, Holland R, Broadway DC. Improving adherence to glaucoma medication: a randomised controlled trial of a patient-centred intervention (The Norwich Adherence Glaucoma Study). BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:32. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-14-32.
  • Chang JS Jr, Lee DA, Petursson G, et al. The effect of a glaucoma medication reminder cap on patient compliance and intraocular pressure. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. 1991;7(2):117–124. doi:10.1089/jop.1991.7.117.
  • Chen X, Chen Y, Sun X. Notable role of glaucoma club on patients’ knowledge of glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(6):590–594. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02101.x.
  • Cook PF, Bremer RW, Ayala AJ, Kahook MY. Feasibility of motivational interviewing delivered by a glaucoma educator to improve medication adherence. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:1091–1101. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S12765.
  • Djafari F, Lesk MR, Giguère C, Siam G, Freeman EE. Impact of a brief educational intervention on glaucoma persistence: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(6):380–386. doi:10.3109/09286586.2015.1083036.
  • Dreer LE, Girkin CA, Campbell L, Wood A, Gao L, Owsley C. Glaucoma medication adherence among African Americans: program development. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(8):883–897. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000009.
  • Dreer LE, Owsley C, Campbell L, Gao L, Wood A, Girkin CA. Feasibility, patient acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a culturally informed, health promotion program to improve glaucoma medication adherence among African americans: “ g laucoma management o ptimism for A frican Americans L iving with glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(1):50–58. doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.1002045.
  • Fiscella R, Caplan E, Kamble P, Bunniran S, Uribe C, Chandwani H. The effect of an educational intervention on adherence to intraocular pressure-lowering medications in a large cohort of older adults with glaucoma. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24:1284–1294.
  • Flowers B, Wand M, Piltz-Seymour J, et al. Patients’ and physicians’ perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: an open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Clin Ther. 2006;28(11):1803–1811. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.11.001.
  • Glanz K, Beck AD, Bundy L, et al. Impact of a health communication intervention to improve glaucoma treatment adherence. Results of the interactive study to increase glaucoma adherence to treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(10):1252–1258. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1607.
  • Gray TA, Fenerty C, Harper R, et al. Individualised patient care as an adjunct to standard care for promoting adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy: an exploratory randomised controlled trial. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(3):407–417. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.269.
  • Gupta VS, Sethi H, Naik M. Strategies to improve glaucoma compliance based on cross-sectional response-based data in a tertiary healthcare center: the glauco-jung study. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2015;9(2):38–46. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1182.
  • Hermann MM, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher CP, Diestelhorst M. Measurement of adherence to brimonidine therapy for glaucoma using electronic monitoring. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(8):502–508. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f3eb4a.
  • Killeen OJ, MacKenzie C, Heisler M, Resnicow K, Lee PP, Newman-Casey PA. User-centered design of the eyeguide: a tailored glaucoma behavior change program. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(10):815–821. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000431.
  • Newman-Casey PA, Niziol LM, Mackenzie CK, et al. Personalized behavior change program for glaucoma patients with poor adherence: a pilot interventional cohort study with a pre-post design. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:128. doi:10.1186/s40814-018-0320-6.
  • Hollenhorst CN, Elliott V, Heisler M, Schneider K, Resnicow K, Newman-Casey PA. Patient Experience during the support, educate, empower glaucoma coaching program to improve medication adherence: a pilot study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020;3(4):238–252. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.016.
  • Newman-Casey PA, Niziol LM, Lee PP, Musch DC, Resnicow K, Heisler M. The impact of the support, educate, empower personalized glaucoma coaching pilot study on glaucoma medication adherence. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020;3(4):228–237. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.013.
  • Lai Y, Wu Y, Chai C, et al. The effect of patient education and telemedicine reminders on adherence to eye drops for glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020;3(5):369–376. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.05.005.
  • Laibovitz R, Boyle J, Snyder E, Strohmaier K, Adamsons I. Dorzolamide versus pilocarpine as adjunctive therapies to timolol: a comparison of patient preference and impact on daily life. Clin Ther. 1996;18(5):821–832. doi:10.1016/S0149-2918(96)80042-7.
  • Laster SF, Martin JL, Fleming JB. The effect of a medication alarm device on patient compliance with topical pilocarpine. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67:654–658.
  • Leshno A, Gaton D, Singer R, et al. A novel EyePhone© App for improving adherence to glaucoma therapy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:1253–1262. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05091-6.
  • Lim MC, Watnik MR, Imson KR, Porter SM, Granier AM. Adherence to glaucoma medication: the effect of interventions and association with personality type. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(6):439–446. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cd0ae.
  • Lunnela J, Kääriäinen M, Kyngäs H. Web-based intervention for improving adherence of people with glaucoma. J Nurs Healthcare Chron Ill. 2011;3(2):119–129. doi:10.1111/j.1752-9824.2011.01097.x.
  • Mammo DA, Strampe M, Naravane A, Mallory PW, Boysen J, Wright MM. Inpatient adherence to topical glaucoma medications before and after an educational intervention. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020;3(5):339–342. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.007.
  • McVeigh KA, Vakros G. The eye drop chart: a pilot study for improving administration of and compliance with topical treatments in glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:813–819.
  • Muir KW, Ventura A, Stinnett SS, Enfiedjian A, Allingham RR, Lee PP. The influence of health literacy level on an educational intervention to improve glaucoma medication adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(2):160–164. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.09.009.
  • Muir KW, Rosdahl JA, Hein AM, et al. Improved glaucoma medication adherence in a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.04.006.
  • Rosdahl JA, Hein AM, Bosworth HB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of an education-based intervention to improve medication adherence: design considerations in the medication adherence in glaucoma to improve care study. Clin Trials. 2021;18(3):343-350. doi: 10.1177/1740774520988291.
  • Nakakura S, Tabuchi H, Baba Y, et al. Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:369–375. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S29912.
  • Norell SE. Improving medication compliance: a randomised clinical trial. Br Med J. 1979;2(6197):1031–1033. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6197.1031.
  • Granström PA. Glaucoma patients not compliant with their drug therapy: clinical and behavioural aspects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66(7):464–470. doi:10.1136/bjo.66.7.464.
  • Okeke CO, Quigley HA, Jampel HD, et al. Interventions improve poor adherence with once daily glaucoma medications in electronically monitored patients. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2286–2293. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.026.
  • Rendell J. Effect of health education on patients’ beliefs about glaucoma and compliance. Insight. 2000;25:112–118.
  • Richardson C, Brunton L, Olleveant N, et al. A study to assess the feasibility of undertaking a randomized controlled trial of adherence with eye drops in glaucoma patients. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:1025–1039. doi:10.2147/PPA.S47785.
  • Sakai H, Shinjyo S, Nakamura Y, Nakamura Y, Ishikawa S, Sawaguchi S. Comparison of latanoprost monotherapy and combined therapy of 0.5% timolol and 1% dorzolamide in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) in Japanese patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(6):483–489. doi:10.1089/jop.2005.21.483.
  • Schenker H, Maloney S, Liss C, Gormley G, Hartenbaum D. Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ther. 1999;21(1):138–147. doi:10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88274-0.
  • Sclar DA, Skaer TL, Chin A, Okamoto MP, Nakahiro RK, Gill MA. Effectiveness of the C cap in promoting prescription refill compliance among patients with glaucoma. Clin Ther. 1991;13:396–400.
  • Sheppard J, Warner J, Kelley K. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a nurse-led glaucoma monitoring clinic. Ophthalmic. Nurs. 2003;7(2):15–21.
  • Sleath B, Blalock SJ, Carpenter DM, et al. Ophthalmologist-patient communication, self-efficacy, and glaucoma medication adherence. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(4):748–754. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.001.
  • Sleath B, Carpenter DM, Blalock SJ, et al. Applying the resources and supports in self-management framework to examine ophthalmologist-patient communication and glaucoma medication adherence. Health Educ Res. 2015;30(5):693–705. doi:10.1093/her/cyv034.
  • Sleath BL, Blalock SJ, Muir KW, et al. Determinants of self-reported barriers to glaucoma medicine administration and adherence: a multisite study. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48(7):856–862. doi:10.1177/1060028014529413.
  • Stack RR, McKellar MJ. Black eye drop bottle tips improve compliance. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(1):39–41. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2004.00705.x.
  • Sverrisson T, Gross R, Pearson J, Rusk C, Adamsons I. The dorzolamide/timolol combination versus timolol plus pilocarpine: patient preference and impact on daily life. United States Patient Preference Study Group. International Patient Preference Study Group. J Glaucoma. 1999;8(5):315–324. doi:10.1097/00061198-199910000-00008.
  • Vin A, Schneider S, Muir KW, Rosdahl JA. Health coaching for glaucoma care: a pilot study using mixed methods. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1931–1943.
  • Waisbourd M, Dhami H, Zhou C, et al. The wills eye glaucoma app: interest of patients and their caregivers in a smartphone-based and tablet-based glaucoma application. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(9):e787–791. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000504.
  • Kowing D, Messer D, Slagle S, Wasik A. Programs to optimize adherence in glaucoma. Optometry. 2010;81(7):339–350. doi:10.1016/j.optm.2009.09.021.
  • McDonald JE, Dickinson JK, Novel A. Approach to helping people with glaucoma use their drops routinely. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(5):331–334. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001366.
  • Lacey J, Cate H, Broadway DC. Barriers to adherence with glaucoma medications: a qualitative research study. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(4):924–932. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.103.
  • Friedman DS, Hahn SR, Gelb L, et al. Doctor-patient communication, health-related beliefs, and adherence in glaucoma results from the Glaucoma adherence and persistency study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1320–1327, 1327.e1321-1323. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.023.
  • Sclar DA, Skaer TL, Chin A, Okamoto MP, Nakahiro RK, Gill MA. Effectiveness of the C Cap(TM) in promoting prescription refill compliance among patients with glaucoma. Clin Ther. 1991;13:396–400.
  • Leonard K, Masatu MC. Outpatient process quality evaluation and the Hawthorne effect. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(9):2330–2340. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.003.
  • Mangione-Smith R, Elliott MN, McDonald L, McGlynn EA. An observational study of antibiotic prescribing behavior and the Hawthorne effect. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(6):1603–1623. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.10482.
  • Varadaraj V, Kahook MY, Ramulu PY, Pitha IF. Patient acceptance of sustained glaucoma treatment strategies. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(4):328–335. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000913.
  • Brandt JD, DuBiner HB, Benza R, Sall KN, Walker GA, Semba CP. Long-term safety and efficacy of a sustained-release bimatoprost ocular ring. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(10):1565–1566. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.022.
  • Lewis RA, Christie WC, Day DG, et al. Bimatoprost sustained-release implants for glaucoma therapy: 6-month results from a phase I/II clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:137–147. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.11.020.
  • Natarajan JV, Chattopadhyay S, Ang M, et al. Sustained release of an anti-glaucoma drug: demonstration of efficacy of a liposomal formulation in the rabbit eye. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24513. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024513.
  • Ciolino JB, Hoare TR, Iwata NG, et al. A drug-eluting contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3346–3352. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2826.
  • Patil S, Reshetnikov S, Haldar MK, Seal S, Mallik S. Surface-derivatized nanoceria with human carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors and fluorophores: a potential drug delivery device. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(24):8437–8442. doi:10.1021/jp067666l.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.