Combined Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery – A Review of the Literature and Future Directions

REFERENCES

• Birnbaum FA, Neeson C, Solá-Del Valle D. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: an evidence-based review. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021;36(8):772–786. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1903513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saheb H, Ahmed IIK. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthamol. 2012;23(2):96–104.doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(11):1779–1786. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01036-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open angle glaucoma and cataract: the HORIZON study. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(1):29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand N, Klug E, Nirappel A, Solá-Del V. David. A review of cyclodestructive procedures for the treatment of glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol. 2020;35(5–6):261–275. doi:10.1080/08820538.2020.1810711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahook MY, Lathrop KL, Noecker RJ. One-site versus two-site endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:527–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MM, Rageh A, Turalba AV, et al. Differential efficacy of combined phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation in open-angle glaucoma versus angle-closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019;28:473–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SA, Mitchell W, Hall N, et al. Trends and usage patterns of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2021;4(6):558–568. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttram J, Oguntoye M, Chen K, Kim W. Outcome of combined photocoagulation with trabecular microbypass minimaly invasive glaucoma surgeries. in the treatment of advanced open angle glaucoma. Abstract. American Glaucoma Society Annual Meeting. San Fracisco, CA. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Oguntoye M, Chen K, Mudaliar S, Kim W. Combining MIGS for treatment of open angle glaucoma: a long term post-operative retrospective study. Abstract. American Glaucoma Society Annual Meeting. Washington D.C. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Uram M. Ophthalmic laser microendoscope ciliary process ablation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992;992:1823–1828. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31718-X.
   Google Scholar
• Pantcheva MG, Kahook MY, Schuman JS, Noecker RJ. Comparison of acute structural and histopathological changes in human autopsy eyes after endoscopic and cyclophotocoagulation and trans scleral cyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(2):248–252. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.103580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Berke SJ, Dustin L, Noecker R. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(8):1313–1321. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolome F, Rodrigues IA, Goyal S, et al. Phacoemulsification plus endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus phacoemulsification alone in primary open angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(2):168–174. doi:10.5301/ejo.5001034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ECP Collaborative Study Group. Complications of ECP: a large, longer term, multicenter study. Ocular Surg News. 2006;2006:15.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Katz JL, Wells JM, Duh YJ, Giamporcaro JE. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):459–467. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR, Lubeck DM, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled pivotal trial of an ab interno implanted trabecular microbypass in primary open angle glaucoma and cataract: two year results. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(6):811–821. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes RAP, Gravina DM, Lake JC, Guedes VMP, Chaoubah A. Intermediate results of iStent or iStent inject implantation combined with cataract surgery in a real-world setting: a longitudinal retrospective study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(1):87–100. doi:10.1007/s40123-019-0166-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas L, Chaudhary A, Berdahl JP, et al. Goniotomy using the Kahood Dual Blade in severe and refractory glaucoma: 6 month outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):849–855. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieck EG, Epstein RS, Kennedy JB, et al. Outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy with and without phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 2018;1(1):75–81. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2018.06.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berdahl JP, Gallardo MJ, ElMallah MK, et al. Six-month outcomes of goniotomy performed with the Kahook Dual Blade as a stand alone glaucoma procedure. Adv Ther. 2018;35(11):2093–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WJ, Kim JM, Lee WH, Kim KN, Kim CS. Effect of combined goniotomy and phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47(6):757–765. doi:10.1111/ceo.13506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson TJ, Swan R, Sudhagoni R, Berdahl JP. Microbypass stent implanation with cataract extraction and endocyclophotocoagulation versus microbypass stent with cataract extraction for glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(3):377–382. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic M, Campos-Moller X, Saheb H, et al. Efficacy and adverse event profile of the iStent and iStent trabecular MIcro-bypass for open angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018;12:67–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantalon AD, Barata ADDO, Georgopoulos M, et al. Outcome of phacoemulsification combined with two iStent inject trabecular microbypass stents with or without endocyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;3:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo JC, Agudelo N, Rubio B, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and 360degree endocyclophotocoagulation with and without a Kahook Dual Blade in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:11–17. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S282440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug E, Chachanidze M, Nirappel A, et al. Outcomes of phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation performed with dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy or trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion. Eye. 2021;36(2):424–432. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01475-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heersink M, Dovich JA. Ab interno canaloplasty combined with trabecular bypass stenting in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1533–1542. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S215667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson TJ, Berdahl JP, Schweitzer JA, Sudhagoni R. Evaluation of a trabecular microbypass stent in pseudophakic patients with open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:896–900. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW. Long-term effects of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in normotensive and ocular hypertensive eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):735–742. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew DJ, McKay BR, Basilious A, Belkin A, Trope GE, Buys YM. Adherence to world glaucoma association guidelines for surgical trials in the era of microinvasive glaucoma surgeries. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2(2):78–85. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2019.01.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar