Testing the Risk Perception Attitude Framework in the Context of Texting While Driving

References

• Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Atchley, P., Atwood, S. & Boulton, A. (2011). The choice to text and drive: Behavior may shape attitude. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 134–142. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. H. (Ed.). (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. In Health education monographs (Vol. 2, pp. 324–508). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1980). Predicting and understanding consumer behavior: Attitude–behavior correspondence. In I. Ajzen & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (pp. 148–172). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Governors Highway Safety Association (2014). Distracted driving laws. Retrieved from http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/cellphone_laws.html
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Carnot, C. G., Beach, R. & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 315–318. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallaq, J. H. (1976). The pledge as an instrument of behavioral change. The Journal of Social Psychology, 98, 147–148. doi:10.1080/00224545.1976.9923382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, C. R., Sallis, J. F. & Hovell, M. F. (1990). Some health dimensions of self-efficacy: Analysis of theoretical specificity. Social Science & Medicine, 31, 1051–1056. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90118-c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E. & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 267–320). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J. (2001). Interaction effects in logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). (2012). One text or call would wreck it all. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., Atchley, P. & Little, T. D. (2009). The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41, 438–444. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemme, H. E. & White, K. M. (2010). Texting while driving: Psychosocial influences on young people's texting intentions and behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1257–1265. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Ferra, P., Liu, Y. & Beatty, M. J. (2012). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of text messaging to substance-induced impairment on driving performance. Communication Research Reports, 29, 227–238. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.696079
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: The central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real, K. (2008). Information seeking and workplace safety: A field application of the risk perception attitude framework. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 339–359. doi:10.1080/00909880802101763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N. (2000). Closing the knowledge–behavior gap in health promotion: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Health Communication, 12, 219–237. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1203_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N. (2001). Perceived risk and self-efficacy as motivators: Understanding individuals' long-term use of health information. Journal of Communication, 51, 633–653. doi:10.1093/joc/51.4.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., Bose, K., Brown, J., Mkandawire, G. & Folda, L. (2009). Extending the purview of the risk perception attitude framework: Findings from HIV/AIDS prevention research in Malawi. Health Communication, 24, 210–218. doi:10.1080/10410230902804109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., Brown, J., Mkandawire, G., Folda, L., Bose, K. & Creel, A. H. (2009). Audience segmentation as a social-marketing tool in health promotion: Use of the risk perception attitude framework in HIV prevention in Malawi. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2224–2229. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.155234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N. & Juon, H. S. (2010). Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 287–310. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N. & Moran, A. C. (2005, May). Testing the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to promote maternal health: Findings from Burkina Faso. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N. & Real, K. (2003). Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research, 29, 370–399. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00844.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. W., Beckjord, E. B., Rutten, L. J. F. & Hesse, B. W. (2008). Nutrition-related cancer prevention cognitions and behavioral intentions: Testing the risk perception attitude framework. Health Education & Behavior, 35, 866–879. doi:10.1177/1090198108326164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M., Rimal, R. N., Morrison, D. & Kim, H. (2006). The role of anxiety in seeking and retaining risk information: Testing the risk perception attitude framework in two studies. Human Communication Research, 32, 130–156. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. doi:10.1080/03637759409376328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, N. (2009). Investigating the effects of cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on cancer prevention adherence and intentions. Health Communication, 24, 95–105. doi:10.1080/10410230802676474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. & Cai, X. (2009). The role of risk, efficacy, and anxiety in smokers' cancer information seeking. Health Communication, 24, 259–269. doi:10.1080/10410230902805932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar