Maintaining Relationship Alternatives Electronically: Positive Relationship Maintenance in Back Burner Relationships

References

• Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication, Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.
   Google Scholar
• Borzea, D., & Dillow, M. R. (2017). Dispositional characteristics of individuals involved in back burner relationships. Communication Research Reports, 34, 316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity, and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., & Drouin, M. (2014). Using modern technology to keep in touch with back burners: An investment model analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 96–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Drouin, M., Aune, K. S., & Boller, R. R. (2015). Simmering on the back burner: Communication with and disclosure of relationship alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 63, 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., Miller, D. A., & Dibble, J. L. (2015). Facebook or memory: Which is the real threat to your relationship? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 561–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmers, T. M., & Canary, D. J. (1996). The effect of uncertainty reducing strategies on young couples’ relational repair and intimacy. Communication Quarterly, 44(2), 166–182.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J. O. (2002). The new science of intimate relationships. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertson, J., Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1998). Relational continuity constructional units and the maintenance of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 774–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Love, desire, and the suppression of thoughts of romantic alternatives. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., & Chávez, A. M. (2005). Relational maintenance in cross-sex friendships characterized by different types of romantic intent: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 339–358.
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2010). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38, 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & Miller, S. M. (2009). The implicit cognition of relationship maintenance: Inattention to attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 174–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murstein, B. I., & Adler, E. R. (1995). Gender differences in power and self-disclosure in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 2, 199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Social media update 2016. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017). A third of Americans live in a household with three or more smartphones. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/25/a-third-of-americans-live-in-a-household-with-three-or-more-smartphones/
   Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Campbell, L. (2001). The structure and function of ideal standards in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 86–106). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic maintenance: Scale development, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. C., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yela, C. (2000). Predictors of and factors related to loving and sexual satisfaction for men and women. European Review of Applied Psychology, 50, 235–243.
   Google Scholar