Explaining Privacy Control on Instagram and Twitter: The Roles of Narcissism and Self-Esteem

References

• Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure? Assessment, 18, 67–87. doi:10.1177/1073191110382845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, H., Kwolek, E. A., & Bowman, N. D. (2015). Two faces of narcissism on SNS: The distinct effects of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism on SNS privacy control. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 375–381. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society, 3, 1–13. doi:10.1177/2056305117691544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). doi:10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394
   Google Scholar
• Brummelman, E., Thomaes, A., & Sedikides, C. (2016). Separating narcissism from self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 8–13. doi:10.1177/0963721415619737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E. A., & Sedikides, C. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 358–368. doi:10.1177/0146167202286007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 482–486. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 341–345. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23, 295–302. doi:10.1177/0956797611429709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, A., Dickard, M., Magee, R., & Agosto, D. E. (2014). What do teens ask their online social networks?: Social search practices among high school students. Proceedings of the 17th CSCW Conference (pp. 28–37). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gaucher, D., Wood, J. V., Stinson, D. A., Forest, A. L., Holmes, J. G., & Logel, C. (2012). Perceived regard explains self-esteem differences in expressivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1144–1156. doi:10.1177/0146167212445790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Lwin, M. O., Yee, A. Z., & Lee, E. W. (2017). Understanding factors associated with Singaporean adolescents’ intention to adopt privacy protection behavior using an extended theory of planned behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20, 572–579. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types. Proceedings of the Eighth ICWSM Conference (pp. 595–598). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, Y., & Coyle, E. (2014). What are you worrying about on Facebook and Twitter? An empirical investigation of young social network site users’ privacy perceptions and behaviors. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14, 51–59. doi:10.1080/15252019.2014.930678
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2004). Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 472–478. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.472
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKinney, B. C., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). Narcissism or openness?: College students’ use of Facebook and Twitter. Communication Research Reports, 29, 108–118. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.666919
   Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 357–364. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panek, E. T., Nardis, Y., & Konrath, S. (2013). Mirror or megaphone?: How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2004–2012. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115–122. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2009). The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3. Retrieved from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4223/3265
   Google Scholar
• Walrave, M., Vanwesenbeeck, I., & Heirman, W. (2012). Connecting and protecting? Comparing predictors of self-disclosure and privacy settings use between adolescents and adults. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6. Retrieved from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4259/3297
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25, 371–390. doi:10.2307/3250922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar