1,161
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Commonly done but not socially accepted? Phubbing and social norms in dyadic and small group settings

References

  • Aagaard, J. (2019). Digital akrasia: A qualitative study of phubbing. AI & Society, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00876-0
  • Campbell, S. W. (2007). Perceptions of mobile phone use in public settings: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Communication, 1, 738–757.
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi:10.1177/01461672002610009
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Hales, A. H., Dvir, M., Wesselmann, E. D., Kruger, D. J., & Finkenauer, C. (2018). Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 460–473. doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1439877
  • Harrison, M. A., Bealing, C. E., & Salley, J. M. (2015). 2 TXT or not 2 TXT: College students’ reports of when text messaging is social breach. The Social Science Journal, 52(2), 188–194. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2015.02.005
  • McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
  • Merton, R. K., & Rossi, A. K. (1968). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 279–334). New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2017). A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Communication Studies, 68(2), 190–207. doi:10.1080/10510974.2017.1299024
  • Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
  • Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393–409. doi:10.1111/comt.12080
  • Rimal, R. N., Lapinski, M. K., Turner, M. M., & Smith, K. C. (2011). The attribute-centered approach for understanding health behaviors: Initial ideas and future research directions. Studies in Communication Sciences, 11, 15–34.
  • Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184–203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00288.x
  • Saxena, D. P. (1971). The reference group concept. Social Science, 46(3), 155–164.
  • Schneider, F. M., & Hitzfeld, S. (2019). I ought to put down that phone but i phub nevertheless: Examining the predictors of phubbing behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 089443931988236. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894439319882365
  • Vorderer, P., Hefner, D., Reinecke, L., & Klimmt, C. (Eds.). (2018). Permanently online, permanently connected. Living and communicating in a POPC world. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. M. (2016). Permanently online – Permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694–703. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.085
  • Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368. doi:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.