Development and validation of the commitment to social activism scale using the Thurstone scaling procedure

References

• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corning, A. F., & Myers, D. J. (2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D., Brewer, M. B., & Lac, A. (2015). Principles and methods of social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/14423-000
   Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). The social movements reader: Cases and concepts. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450050104
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086306
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L., & Suchman, E. A. (1947). Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis. American Sociological Review, 12(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y., Turner, M. M., Heo, R. J., & Barry, R. (2021). A new approach to audience segmentation for vaccination messaging: Applying the anger activism model. Journal of Social Marketing, 11(4), 424–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-10-2020-0206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, M., & Kasser, T. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological well‐being. Political Psychology, 30(5), 755–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00724.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5–55.
   Google Scholar
• McKeever, B. W., McKeever, R., Choi, M., & Huang, S. (2023). From advocacy to activism: A multi-dimensional scale of communicative, collective, and combative behaviors.Journalism &. Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(3), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231161035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the internet. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfundmair, M., Paulus, M., & Wagner, E. (2020). Activism and radicalism in adolescence: An empirical test on age-related differences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(8), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1850725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorisat, T., Boster, F. J., & Salmon, C. T. (2019). Predicting activism for a social cause. Communication Studies, 70(1), 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1504808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 61(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of Anger: The state trait anger scale. In J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 161–174). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2022). Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927). The method of paired comparisons for social values. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21(4), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0065439
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M., Richards, A. S., Bessarabova, E., & Magid, Y. (2020). The effects of anger appeals on systematic processing and intentions: The moderating role of efficacy. Communication Reports, 33(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zunes, S., Asher, S. B., & Kurtz, L. (Eds.). (1999). Nonviolent social movements: A geographical perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar