Benefits realized and lessons learned from modeling the production capacity of the Jansen Potash Project

References

• Ahmed, R., Shah, M., and Umar, M., 2016, “Concepts of simulation model size and complexity.” Internat Journal Simulation Model, 15(2). pp. 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, S., 2000, Ensuring a successful simulation modeling project. https://www.qualitydigest.com/nov00/html/simulation.html.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J., and Gibson, R., 1996, “Getting started in simulation modeling,” IIE Solutions, November 1996. Atlanta, GA: Institute of Industrial Engineers. repository.binus.ac.id/content/I0152/I015257715.doc
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, S. C., and Boggis, P., 2018, “Stochastic optimization of the Jansen potash production and logistics chain”, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. Accepted for Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, S. C., Boggis, P., Monk, B. G., Pereira, M., Quan, K., and Fleming, S., 2018, “Discrete-event simulation modeling unlocks value for the Jansen potash project.” Interfaces, 48(1). pp. 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwif, L., 1999, “Discrete event simulation model reduction in its conceptualization: a causal approach”, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechatronics Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil: University of São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Chwif, L., Pereira Barretto, M. R., and Paul, R. J., 2000, On simulation model complexity, In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, 10–13 Dec, 2000, (J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, and P. A. Fishwick, Eds.), Orlando, FL: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 449–455.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, G. S., 2001, Discrete-event simulation: modeling, programming, and analysis, (P. Glynn and S. M. Robinson, Eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 218–294, 524.
   Google Scholar
• Jägstam, M., and Klingstam, P., 2002, General methodology 1: a handbook for integrating discrete event simulation as an aid in conceptual design of manufacturing systems, In Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Winter Simulation: Exploring New Frontiers, Dec 8–11, 2002, (E. Yucesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, and J. M. Charnes, Eds.), San Diego, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 1940–1944.
   Google Scholar
• Maghnouji, R., De Vreede, G. J., Verbraeck, A., and Sol, H. G., 2001, Collaborative simulation modeling: experiences and lessons learned, In Proceeding of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan 3–6, 2001, (R. H. Sprague, Ed.), Maui, HW, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• McHaney, R., White, D., and Heilman, G. E., 2002, “Simulation project success and failure: survey findings.” Simulation & Gaming, 33(1). pp. 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Musselman, K. J., 1993, Guidelines for simulation project success, In Proceedings of the 1993 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec 12–15, 1993, (G. W. Evans, M. Mollaghasemi, E. C. Russel, and W. E. Biles, Eds.), Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Musselman, K. J., 1998, Guidelines for success, In Part V, Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, (J. Banks, Ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience and Engineering and Management Press, A Division of the Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp. 721–744.
   Google Scholar
• Ulgen, O. M., Black, J. J., Johnsonbaugh, B., and Klungle, R., 2000, Simulation methodology – A practitioner’s perspective, Michigan Simulation User Group, Technical Committee on Simulation Methodology. Dearborn, UT: Autosimulations.
   Google Scholar
• Ulgen, O. M., Gunal, A., and Shore, J., 1996, Pitfalls of simulation modeling and how to avoid them by using a robust simulation methodology. In Proceedings of the AutoSimulations Symposium ’96, Bountiful, UT, USA, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. J., 1996, Making simulation a corporate norm, In Proceedings of the 1996 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, July 21–25, 1996, (V. W. Ingalls, J. Cynamon, and A. V. Saylor, Eds.), Portland, OR: Society for Computer Simulation, pp. 627–632.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. J., 1997, Discrete-event process simulation for continuous simulation model builder, In Proceedings of the 1997 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, July 13–17, 1997, (M. S. Obaidat and J. Illgen, Eds.), Arlington, VA: Society for Computer Simulation, pp. 363–367.
   Google Scholar
• Withers, D. H., 2000, Software engineering best practices applied to the modeling process, In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, 10–13 Dec, 2000, (J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, and P. A. Fishwick, Eds.), Orlando, FL: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 432–439.
   Google Scholar