Washability Analysis of Coal Using RhoVol: A Novel 3D Image-based Method

References

• Behera, D., B. Nandi, and S. Bhattacharya. 2019. Chemical properties and combustion behavior of constituent relative density fraction of a thermal coal. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 41:654–64. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1520348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, D., B. Nandi, and S. Bhattacharya. 2020. Studies on combustion characteristics of density by density analyzed coal. The Journal of Energy Resources Technology 142 (1):012301. doi:10.1115/1.4044973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blott, S. J., and K. Pye. 2008. Particle shape: A review and new methods of characterization and classification. Sedimentology 55:31–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botlhoko, S., Q. P. Campbell, M. le Roux, and F. Nakhaei. 2021. Application of Rhovol information for coal washability analysis. Coal Processing Conference 2021, Secunda, South Africa
   Google Scholar
• Fofana, M., and T. Steyn. 2019. Monitoring the performance of DMS circuits using RhoVol technology. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 119 (2):133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, K., A. Voigt, and N. Bodika. 2003. Using silhouette consistency constraints to build 3D models. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (PRASA 2003), 33–38, Langebaan, South Africa, November.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, K., F. Nicolls, G. Dejager, and A. Voigt. 2006. Shape-from-silhouette with two mirrors and an uncalibrated camera. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2006), 165–78. Graz, Austria: Springer, May 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Irannajad, M., F. Nakhaei, and S. Mohammadnejad. 2018. Correlation between column flotation froth image features in respect to operational variables. Journal of Mineral Resources Engineering 3 (1):59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson, S. M., D. M. Hunter, and K. P. Galvin. 2015. A water-based method for measuring density-based partition curves of separators used in coal and mineral processing. Minerals Engineering 79:196–211. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2015.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargalmaa, S., T. Gerelmaa, E. Baterdene, G. Tsatsral, B. Avid, B. Purevsuren, J. Dugarjav. 2015. Washability of coal from seams IV and VIII of the Tavantolgoi deposit. Natural Resources Research 24:189–95. doi:10.1007/s11053-014-9245-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawatra, S. K. 2020. Advanced coal preparation and beyond: CO₂ capture and utilization. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelkar, S., S. Stella, C. Boushey, and M. Okos. 2011. Developing novel 3d measurement techniques and prediction method for food density determination. Procedia Food Science 1:483–91. doi:10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.074.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and G. Dodbiba. 2021. A novel method for simultaneous evaluation of particle geometry by using image processing analysis. Powder Technology 393:60–73. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, A. A., and İ. Bentli. 2017. Determination of washability characteristics of Arguvan- Malatya lignite by different washability index methods. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 39 (14):1572–80. doi:10.1080/15567036.2017.1347730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korolev, I., and V. I. Udovitskiy. 2016. Analytical representation of washability curves with application in the simulation of gravity concentration methods. In XVIII International Coal Preparation Congress, eds. V. Litvinenko, 192–96. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwick, J. C., and P. L. Henderson. 1986. Particle shape and inference of size from Sieving. Sedimentology 11 (3–4):197–235. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1968.tb00853.x.
   Google Scholar
• Majumder, A. K., and J. P. Barnwal. 2004. Development of a new coal washability index. Minerals Engineering 17:93–96. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2003.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangera, R., G. Morrison, and A. P. Voigt. 2016. Particle volume correction using shape features. Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa and Robotics and Mechatronics International Conference (PRASA-RobMech), 1–6. Stellenbosch, South Africa, 30 November–2 December.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, F., P. Verboven, H. K. Mebatsion, G. Kerkhofs, M. Wevers, and B. Nicolai. 2007. Three-dimensional pore space quantification of apple tissue using X-ray computed microtomography. Planta 226:559–70. doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0504-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, R. A., J. S. Laskowski, and A. D. Walters. 2003. Coal preparation. In The encyclopedia of physical science and technology, ed. R. A. Meyers, 79–106. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., C. L. Lin, and A. B. Cortes. 1990. A review of X-ray computed tomography and its applications in mineral processing. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review 7 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/08827509008952663.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. K., and S. N. Gurulaxmi. 2013. Float-sink apparatus and its use in the mineral industry. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review 34 (2):130–38. doi:10.1080/08827508.2011.635734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. K. 2009. A new method for evaluation of gravity separation processes. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review 30 (3):191–210. doi:10.1080/08827500802405756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakhaei, F., M. Irannajad, and S. Mohammadnejad. 2018. Evaluation of column flotation froth behavior by image analysis: Effects of operational factors in desulfurization of iron ore concentrate. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 40 (19):2286–306. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1486485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakhaei, F., M. Irannajad, and S. Mohammadnejad. 2019a. A comprehensive review of froth surface monitoring as an aid for grade and recovery prediction of flotation process. Part A: Structural Features, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. doi:10.1080/15567036.2019.1663313.
   Google Scholar
• Nakhaei, F., M. Irannajad, and S. Mohammadnejad. 2019b. Column flotation performance prediction: PCA, ANN and image analysis-based approaches. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing 55 (5):1298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sushobhan, P., and M. Satyabrata. 2020. A method to perform float-and-sink test for separation of coal samples of various densities and determination of ‘Probable error’ and ‘Imperfection. IOP SciNotes 1:024403. doi:10.1088/2633-1357/abaf36.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vlierberghe, S., G. J. Graulus, S. Keshari Samal, I. Van Nieuwenhove, and P. Dubruel. 2014. Porous hydrogel biomedical foam scaffolds for tissue repair. In Biomedical foams for tissue engineering applications, ed. P. A. Netti, 335–90. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing (76).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Y. Z. Tian, Y. Q. Qiu, J. X. Cao, and T. C. Xiao. 2011. Study on the washability of the Kaitai coal, Guizhou province China. Fuel Processing Technology 92:692–98. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. R., N. Yoon, and E. M. Holuszko. 2021. Assessment of coal sortability and washability using dual energy X-ray transmission system. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 1–13. doi:10.1080/19392699.2021.1914024.
   Google Scholar