An Investigation of U.S. Undergraduate Business School Rankings Using Data Envelopment Analysis With Value-Added Performance Indicators

REFERENCES

• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficiency units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39, 1261–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35, 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert, A., Levary, R. R., & Shaner, M. C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 656–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gloeckler, G. (2013, March 20). Notre Dame's Mendoza takes no. 1 ranking, again. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http: //www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-20/notre-dames-mendoza-takes-no-dot-1-ranking-again
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. (2013). How bad is it? The student loan default crisis in perspective. Coalition of State University Aid Administrators. Retrieved from http://www.cosuaa.org/conference/2013_Resources/Presentations/How%20Bad%20Is%20It-Loan%20Default-COSUAA%202013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hirao, Y. (2012). Efficiency of the top 50 business schools in the United States. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immerwahr, J., & Johnson, J. (2009). Squeeze play 2009: The public's views on college costs today. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, W., & Fu, T. (2012). Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators. Omega, 40, 541–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, D., & Wood, W. (2007). Value-added adjustment in undergraduate business school ranking. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 357–362.
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle, L. (2006, May 8). The best undergraduate B-schools. Business Week, 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle, L. (2013, March 20). FAQ: How we ranked the schools. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http: //www.businessweek.com/articles/2013–03-20/faq-how-we-ranked-the-schools#r=lr-sr
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. A., & Liu, W. (2010). Performance evaluation on private higher education using data envelopment analysis. Proceedings of the IIE Annual Conference, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Higher Education. (2013). Resident mandatory fee rates. Retrieved from http: //www.mass.edu/campuses/res_fees.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Digest of education statistics 2012, table 381. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_381.asp
   Google Scholar
• Park, K. S., Lee, K. W., Park, M. S., & Kim, D. (2009). Joint use of DEA and constrained correlation analysis for efficiency valuations involving categorical variables. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 1775–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, C. (2012). Spreadsheet modeling & decision analysis (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sav, G. T. (2012). Productivity, efficiency, and managerial performance regress and gains in United States universities: A data envelopment analysis. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 2(3), 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sav, G. T. (2013). Four-stage DEA efficiency evaluations: Financial reforms in public university funding. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5, 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical approach to frontier analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1–2), 7–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. R., & Comunale, C. L. (2010). An efficiency analysis of U.S. business schools. Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, 1. Retrieved from http: //www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09256.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sreekumar, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2011). Performance modeling of Indian business schools: A DEA-neural network approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E. (1993). A comparison of regression analysis and data envelopment analysis as alternative methods for performance assessments. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 1129–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofallis, C. (2001). Combining two approaches to efficiency assessment. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 1225–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar