REFERENCES
- Ary, E. J., & Brune, C. W. (2011). A comparison of student learning outcomes in traditional and online personal finance courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7, 465–474.
- Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2012, May 22). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/interactive-learning-online-public-universities-evidence-randomized-trials
- Carnegie Foundation. (2014). Summary tables: Undergraduate instructional program classification. Retrieved from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/summary/ugrad_prog.php.
- CUNY Hybrid Initiative. (2014). Flipping the classroom. Retrieved from http://hybrid.commons.gc.cuny.edu/teaching/additional-resources/flipping-the-classroom/.
- Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40, 312–331.
- Ettner, S. (n.d.). Methods for addressing selection bias in observational studies. Los Angeles, CA: Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA.
- Figlio, D. N., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it Internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 16089. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Haughton, D., & Haughton, J. (2011). Living standards analytics: Development through the lens of household survey data. New York, NY: Springer.
- Jaggia, S., & Kelly, A. (2012). Business statistics: Communicating with numbers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
- Joyce, T. J., Crockett, S., Jaeger, D. A., Altindag, O., & O’Connell, S.D. (2014). Does classroom time matter? A randomized field experiment of hybrid and traditional lecture formats in economics. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 20006. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Lack, K A. (2013, March 21). Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/current-status-research-online-learning-postsecondary-education
- Lam, M, (2009). Effectiveness of web-based courses on technical learning. Journal of Education for Business, 6, 323–331.
- Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Digest of Education Statistics 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institution of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/.
- Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
- Sebastianelli, R., & Tamimi, N. (2011). Business statistics and management science online: Teaching strategies and assessment of student learning. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 317–325.
- StataCorp. (2011). STATA statistics/data analysis (version 12.0, special edition). College Station, TX: Author.
- Terry, N. (2007). Assessing instruction modes for master of business administration (MBA) courses. Journal of Education for Business, 4, 220–225.
- U.S. News. (2014). College compass. Retrieved from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/suffolk-university-2218
- Wilson, D., & Allen, D. (2014). Success rates of online versus traditional college students, Research in Higher Education, 14, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/11761.pdf