Textbooks for Responsible Data Analysis in Excel

REFERENCES

• Baker, K., & Powell, S. (2006). Comparison of characteristics and practices amongst spreadsheet users with different levels of experience. Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2006 Conference, 205–220. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0168
   Google Scholar
• Beskeen, D. (2013). Microsoft Office 2013: Illustrated introductory, first course. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bewig, P. (2005). How do you know your spreadsheet is right? arXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5878
   Google Scholar
• Bott, E., & Siechert, C. (2013). Microsoft Office inside out: 2013 edition. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucki, L. A., Walkenbach, J., Alexander, M., Kusleika, D., & Wempen, F. (2013). Office 2013 Bible: The comprehensive tutorial resource. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C., & Scaffidi, C. (2010). Struggling to Excel: A field study of challenges faced by spreadsheet users. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 187–194. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5635221. doi:10.1109/VLHCC.2010.33
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C., Sommers, Z., & Scaffidi, C. (2012). A study of help requested online by spreadsheet users. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 24(4), 41–53. Retrieved from http://www.igi-global.com/article/content/70427
   Google Scholar
• Conner, N., & MacDonald, M. (2013). Office 2013: The missing manual. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, P. (2014, April 18). FAQ: Reinhart, Rogoff, and the Excel error that changed history. Business Week. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-18/faq-reinhart-rogoff-and-the-excel-error-that-changed-history
   Google Scholar
• European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group. (2014). Spreadsheet mistakes: News stories. Retrieved from http://www.eusprig.org/horror-stories.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin, S., Martin, C. L., Graviett, N., Marks, S., & Geoghan, D. (2013). GO! With Microsoft Office 2013. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, T., & Ozluk, O. (2010). Spreadsheets grow up: Three spreadsheet engineering methodologies for large financial planning models. Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2010 Conference. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4174
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. G., & Green, T. R. G. (1994). Creating, comprehending and explaining spreadsheets: a cognitive interpretation of what discretionary users think of the spreadsheet model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 1033–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konczal, M. (2013, April 16). Researchers finally replicated Reinhart-Rogoff, and there are serious problems. Next New Deal: The Blog of the Roosevelt Institute. Retrieved from http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems
   Google Scholar
• Kruck, S. E. (2006). Testing spreadsheet accuracy theory. Information and Software Technology, 48, 204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, S. E., Maher, J. J., & Barkhi, R. (2003). A framework for cognitive skill aquisition and spreadsheet training. In M. A. Mahmood (Ed.), Advanced topics in end user computing (Vol. 2, pp. 212–233). El Paso, TX: University of Texas at El Paso.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., Baker, K., Powell, S., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2009). A comparison of spreadsheet users with different levels of experience. Omega, 37, 579–590. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, B., Dodge, M., Swinford, E., Couch, A., Legault, E., Schorr, B. M., & Rusen, C. (2013). Microsoft Office Professional 2013 step by step. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., & Miller, J. R. (1990). An ethnographic study of distributed problem solving in spreadsheet development. CSCW 90 Proceedings, 197–208. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/99332.99355
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., & Miller, J. R. (1991). Twinkling lights and nested loops: Distributed problem solving and spreadsheet development. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 161–184. doi:10.1016/0020-7373(91)90040-E
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, L., & O’Leary, T. (2013). Microsoft Office 2013: A case approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Panko, R. R. (1999). Applying code inspection to spreadsheet testing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panko, R. R. (2000). Spreadsheet errors: What we know. what we think we can do. Proceedings of the Spreadsheet Risk Symposium European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group (EuSpRIG), 7–17. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.3457
   Google Scholar
• Panko, R. R. (2003). Reducing overconfidence in spreadsheet development. Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2003 Conference, 49–66. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0941
   Google Scholar
• Panko, R. R., & Port, D. (2012). End user computing: The dark matter (and dark energy) of corporate IT. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–14. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6149451
   Google Scholar
• Panko, R. R., & Sprague, R. H. J. (1999). Hitting the wall: Errors in developing and code-inspecting a “simple” spreadsheet model. Decision Support Systems, 22, 337–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. G., & Baker, K. R. (2013). The art of modeling with spreadsheets: Management science, spreadsheet engineering, and modeling craft (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S. G., Baker, K. R., & Lawson, B. (2008). A critical review of the literature on spreadsheet errors. Decision Support Systems, 46, 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. G., & Willemain, T. R. (2006). How novices formulate models. Part I: qualitative insights and implications for teaching. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 983–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffensperger, J. F. (2001). New guidelines for spreadsheets. Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2001 Conference, 61–76. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3186
   Google Scholar
• Rajalingham, K., Chadwick, D., & Knight, B. (2001). An evaluation of a structured spreadsheet development methodology. Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2001 Conference, 39–59. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.1516
   Google Scholar
• Rajalingham, K., Chadwick, D., Knight, B., & Edwards, D. (2000). Quality control in spreadsheets: A software engineering-based approach to spreadsheet development. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=926736
   Google Scholar
• Read, N., & Batson, J. (1999). Spreadsheet modelling best practice. Retrieved from http://www.eusprig.org/smbp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. Working paper no. 15639. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15639
   Google Scholar
• Ronen, B., Palley, M. A., & Lucas, H. C. (1989). Spreadsheet analysis and design. Communications of the ACM, 31, 84–93. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=63244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaffidi, C., Shaw, M., & Myers, B. (2005). Estimating the numbers of end users and end user programmers. Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human, 207–214. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2005.34
   Google Scholar
• Tort, F. (2010). Teaching spreadsheets: Curriculum design principles. Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2010 Conference, 99–110. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2787
   Google Scholar
• Vandeput, E. (2009). Milestones for teaching the spreadsheet program. In Proceedings of EuSpRIG 2009 Conference, 133–143. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1189
   Google Scholar
• Vermaat, M. E. (2013). Discovering computers and Microsoft Office 2013: A fundamental combined approach. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2013). Office 2013 for dummies. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, G. (1998). The psychology of computer programming. New York, NY: Dorset House.
   Google Scholar
• Weverka, P. (2013). Office 2013 all-in-one for dummies. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Willemain, T. R., & Powell, S. G. (2006). How novices formulate models. Part II: A quantitative description of behaviour. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1271–1283. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar