1,932
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Student Reactions to Classroom Management Technology: Learning Styles and Attitudes Toward Moodle

&

REFERENCES

  • Ackerman, D., & Gross, B. (2007). I can start that JME manuscript next week, can't I? The task characteristics behind why faculty procrastinate. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 97–110.
  • Beatty, B., & Ulasewicz, C. (2006). Online teaching and learning in transition: Faculty perspectives on moving from blackboard to the Moodle Learning Management System. TechTrends, 50, 36–45.
  • Beruchashvili, M., Moiso, R., & Heisley, D. (2014). What are you dieting for? The role of lay theories in dieters’ goal setting. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 13, 50–59.
  • Burnette, J. L, O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701.
  • Carvalho, A., Nelson, A., & Silva, J. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Blackboard and Moodle in a Portuguese university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 824–841.
  • Chen, H. R., & Tseng, H. F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of Web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Education and Program Planning, 35, 398–406.
  • Chung, C., & Ackerman, D. (2010, April). Transitions in classroom technology: Needs fulfilled by and reasons for procrastination in the implementation of classroom management technology. Paper presented at the 2010 Marketing Educators' Association, Seattle, WA.
  • Clarke, I. III, Flaherty, T. B., & Mottner, S. (1999). Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 2, 69–77.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 18, 319–340.
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshwa, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
  • Felder, M. F., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 103–112.
  • Fleming, G. (n.d.). Learning styles: Know and use your personal learning style. Retrieved from http://homeworktips.about.com/od/homeworkhelp/a/learningstyle.htm
  • Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers and Education, 59, 569–579.
  • Lai, M. L. (2008). Technology readiness, Internet self-efficacy and computing experience of professional accounting students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 25, 18–29.
  • Lewis, B. A., MacEntee, V. M., DeLaCruz, S., Englander, C., Jeffrey, T., Takach, E., & Woodall, J. (2005). Learning management systems comparison. Proceedings of the 2005 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference, 17–29.
  • Lincoln, D. (2001). Marketing educator Internet adoption in 1998 versus 2000: Significant progress and remaining obstacles. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 103–116.
  • Martinez, A. (2001). Mass customization: designing for successful learning. International Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ijet/v2n2/martinez/index.html
  • Martínez-Torres, M. R., Toral Marín, S. L., Barrero García, F, Gallardo Vázquez, S., Arias, M., & Torres, T. (2008). A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27, 495–505.
  • Moodle. (2015). Moodle statistics. Retrieved from https://moodle.net/stats/
  • Oertig, M. (2011). Debriefing in Moodle: Written feedback on trust and knowledge sharing in a social dilemma game. Simulation and Gaming, 41, 374–389.
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
  • Payette, D. L., & Gupta, R. (2009). Transitioning from Blackboard to Moodle course management software: Faculty and student opinions. American Journal of Business Education, 2(9), 67–73.
  • Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2009). Emerging web technologies in higher education: A case of incorporating blogs, podcasts and social bookmarks in a Web programming course based on students’ learning styles and technology preferences. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 98–109.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7, 112–137.
  • Shih, S. (2011). Perfectionism, implicit theories of intelligence, and Taiwanese eight-grade students’ academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 131–142.
  • Taylor, W. A. (2004). Computer-mediated knowledge sharing and individual user differences: An exploratory study. European Journal of Information Systems, 13, 52–64.
  • Vigentini, L. (2009). Using learning technology in university courses: Do styles matter? Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3, 17–32.
  • Young, M. R., Klemz, B. R., & Murphy, J. W. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 130–142.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.