Evaluating the usage of cloud-based collaboration services through teamwork

References

• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshuwaier, F. A., Alshwaier, A. A., & Areshey, A. M. (2012, August). Applications of cloud computing in education. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Computing and Networking Technology (ICCNT), Gueongju, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Alshwaier, A., Youssef, A., & Emam, A. (2012). A new trend in e-learning in ksa using educational clouds. Advanced Computing: An International Journal, 3, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16, 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Pence, H. E. (2011). Managing laboratory data using cloud computing as an organizational tool. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 761–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A., & Park, S. C. (2013). Why end-users move to the cloud: A migration-theoretic analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 357–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2009). What type of collaboration helps? Psychological ownership, perceived learning and outcome quality of collaboration using Google Docs. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, & Y. Yair (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2009: Learning in the technological era (pp. 48–55). Raanana, Israel: The Open University of Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, S. (2011). Whole class laboratories with Google Docs. Physics Teacher, 49, 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bora, U. J., & Ahmed, M. (2013). E-learning using cloud computing. International Journal of Science and Modern Engineering, 1(2), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative writing with web 2.0 technologies: Education students' perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 73–103.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. K. W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Using online collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge. Online Information Review, 35, 581–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. K. W., Kennedy, D., & Mak, Y. K. (2009, December). MediaWiki and Google Docs as online collaboration tools for group project co-construction. Proceedings of the 6th Paper presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Management, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, R. A., & Szumal, J. L. (1994). The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness. Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 415–437.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, D. (2012). Enhancing instruction through constructivism, cooperative learning, and cloud computing. TechTrends, 56(4), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dignan, L. (2011, April 22). Cloud computing market: $241 billion in 2020. ZDNet. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/article/cloud-computing-market-241-billion-in-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Easley, R. F., Devaraj, S., & Crant, J. M. (2003). Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 247–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, T. (2010). Effective use of cloud computing in educational institutions. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 938–942.
   Google Scholar
• Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz. S. R. (1998/1999). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester Consulting. (2012). Collaboration services: Deployment options for the enterprise. White Paper Commissioned by Cisco Systems. Cambridge, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Galliers, R. (1992). Information systems research: Issues, methods & practical guidelines. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaugher, J. (2014). Information systems: A Manager's guide to harnessing technology. Washington, DC: Flat World Knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallupe, R. B., DeSanctis, G., & Dickson, G. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12, 277–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C. E., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1992). Patterns of communication among marketing engineering and manufacturing: A comparison between two new product development teams. Management Science, 38, 360–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. (1987). Managing the R&D marketing interface. Research Management, 30, 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 67–102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjileontiadou, S. J., Dias, S. B., Diniz, J. A., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2015). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A holistic perspective. In L. A. Tomei (Ed.), Fuzzy logic-based modeling in collaborative and blended learning, advances in educational technologies and instructional design (pp. 51–88). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hargis, J., & Wilcox, S. (2008). Ubiquitous, free, and efficient online collaboration tools for teaching and learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. Jr. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12, 435–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou, M., & Wang, J. (2013). Observations of achievement and motivation in using cloud computing driven CAD: Comparison of college students with high school and vocational high school backgrounds. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 364–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, T., & Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeoch, J. A., & Irion, A. L. (1952). The psychology of human learning. New York, NY: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, P. L., & Liker, J. K. (1992). Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment. Information Systems Research, 3, 195–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. C., & Ryoo, S. Y. (2013). An empirical investigation of end-users switching toward cloud computing: A two factor theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 160–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1990). The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research. European Journal of Operational Research, 46, 143–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems: An assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 75–106.
   Google Scholar
• Quittner, J. (2008, December 5). How SaaS helps cut small business costs. Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2008-12-04/how-saas-helps-cut-small-business-costs
   Google Scholar
• Rienzo, T., & Han, B. (2009). Microsoft or Google Web 2.0 tools for course management. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 123–127.
   Google Scholar
• Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, D. L. (2008, November). Concurrently collaborative spreadsheets in the chemical engineering classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Sinex, S., & Chambers, T. L. (2013). Developing online collaboration skills in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 1244–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaeth, A. D., & Black, R. S. (2012). Google docs as a form of collaborative learning, Chemical Education, 89, 1078–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using google docs on students' writing abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. Y. (2011). Cloud computing: A potential paradigm for practising the scholarship of teaching and learning. The Electronic Library, 29, 214–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16, 201–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1993). Turning work into play: Implications for microcomputer software training. Journal of Management, 19, 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., & Lin, S. (2015). User continuance intention to use cloud storage service. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Understanding SaaS adoption from the perspective of organizational users: A tripod readiness model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 254–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity google docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24, 359–375.
   Google Scholar