What do students think about group work in business education? An investigation into the benefits, challenges, and student-suggested solutions

References

• Anson, R., & Goodman, J. A. (2014). A peer assessment system to improve student team experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 89, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Batra, M. M., Walvoord, B. E., & Krishman, K. S. (1997). Effective pedagogy for student-team projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(2), 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, J., Carlstrom, E. & Sandberg, H. (2012). Models of teamwork: Ideal or not? A critical study of theoretical team models. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18, 328–340.
   Google Scholar
• Betta, M. (2016). Self and others in team-based learning: acquiring teamwork skills for Business. Journal of Education for Business, 91, 69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The employee's viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58, 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, J., White, B. J., & Mennecke, B. E. (2003). Teams and tasks: A temporal framework for the effects of interpersonal interventions on team performance. Small Group Research, 34, 353–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B. L. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of students in groups with a centralized peer evaluation system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 652–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, K. (2007). Tuckman revisited: Proposing a new model of group development for practitioners. The Journal of Experiential Education, 29, 413–417.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. W. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M. (2006). The efficacy of collaborative learning groups in an undergraduate statistics course. College Teaching, 54, 244–248.
   Google Scholar
• Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006). How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 175–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gremler, D. D. (2004). The critical incident technique in service research. Journal of Service Research, 7, 65–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, K. D., & Lee, S. H. (2014). A CIT investigation of disruptive student behaviors: The students’ perspective. Marketing Education Review, 24, 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, K. D., & Lee, S. H. (2015). A CIT investigation of disruptive faculty behaviors: The students’ perspective. Marketing Education Review, 25, 129–139.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, R. (2001). The principle of assumed consent: The ethics of gatekeeping. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaenzig, R., Hyatt, E., & Anderson, S. (2007). Gender differences in college of business educational experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 83, 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiden, B., & Perry, B. (2011). Dealing with free-riders in assessed group work: Results from a study at a UK university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. B. & O'Connor, A. (2013). Understanding students’ attitudes about group work: What does this suggest for instructors of business? Journal of Education for Business, 88, 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, K., & Graham-Buxton, M. (1993). The use of collaborative learning groups in the large class: Is it possible? Teaching Sociology, 21, 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, S., Chia, R., & Burt, G. (2014). Relevance or ‘relevate’? How university business schools can add value through reflexively learning from strategic partnerships with business. Management Learning, 45, 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards, T., & Moger, S. (2000). Creative leadership processes in project team development: An alternative to Tuckman's stage model. British Journal of Management, 11, 273–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2, 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Wagar, T. H., & Carroll, W. R. (2012). Examining student preferences of group work evaluation approaches: Evidence from business management undergraduate students. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 358–362.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2012). Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2003). An initial exploration of the internal dynamics of leadership teams. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55, 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2005). The handbook of group research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development across time: Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34, 223–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., & Hochberger, J. M. (1996). Validation studies of the group development questionnaire. Small Group Research, 27, 143–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Beatty, S. E., & Mothersbaugh, D. (2010). A CIT investigation of other customers' influence in services. Journal of Services Marketing, 24, 389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar