Blended versus face-to-face: Evidence from a graduate corporate finance class

References

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended learning in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, B. (2012). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, lessons at home. The Education Digest, 77(8), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions. Journal of Management Education, 38, 784–817.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Godfrey, M. R., Johnson, M., Pollack, B. L., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2013). Uses of multivariate analytical techniques in online and blended business education: An assessment of current practice and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management Education, 37, 229–260.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, R. S., Buckner, D., Swartz, J., & Rao, S. (2005). Issues in classroom management in an interactive distance education course. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 363–372.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6219/view
   Google Scholar
• Calafiore, P., & Damianov, D. S. (2011). The effect of time spent online on student achievement in online economics and finance courses. Journal of Economic Education, 42, 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coogle, C., & Floyd, K. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous learning environments of rural graduate early childhood special educators using Wimba and Ecampus. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11, 173–187. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Coogle_0615.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinella, J. A. (2007). Professor and student performance in online versus traditional introductory finance courses. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 8, 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33, 381–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The “virtual classroom”: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36, 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcome in online and face-to-face learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, E. B., & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer-mediated communication systems: Status and evolution. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Chen, C. (2011). The influence of integrating pre-lecture online videos in classrooms: A case study. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 244–249). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, C., & Sheather, S. (2010). Variable selection in linear regression. The Stata Journal, 10, 650–669. Retrieved from http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pérez, V. M., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505824.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O'Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9, 473–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, A. Y. (2002). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19, 199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. G. (1976). The influence of teleconferencing medium and status on participants' perception of the aestheticism, evolution, privacy, potency, and activity of the medium. Human Communication Research, 2, 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• Seery, M. K., & Donnelly, R. (2012). The implementation of pre-lecture resources to reduce in-class cognitive load: A case study for higher education chemistry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 667–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams. E. (1978). Teleconferencing: Social and psychological factors. Journal of Communication, 28, 125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar